ipl-logo

Diplomatic Immunity: The Abuse Of Diplomatic Immunity

2017 Words9 Pages
Register to read the introduction…

Immunity is also important as it protects diplomats from harassment by law enforcement from unfriendly governments. Although diplomatic immunity exempts foreign diplomats from the jurisdiction of the host nation, diplomats can still be held accountable for their crimes if the foreign country waives immunity or the individuals are charge d in their country. The concept of diplomatic immunity is often controversial because diplomats are not subject to liability even where they contravene laws. This controversy arises because diplomats with diplomatic immunity sometimes contravene laws intentionally. The abuse of the privilege of diplomatic immunity is a common practice among diplomats and some of the offenses these individuals commit include, espionage, drug trafficking, abuse of employees, tax evasion, driving under the influence, parking violations and financial abuse. Article 27 of the Vienna convention provides that diplomatic bags should not be opened. This implies that if individuals with diplomatic immunity decide to smuggle drugs into the host country they can do so without any legal repercussions because the bags cannot be opened. The loopholes in the concept of diplomatic immunity allow diplomats to abuse the privilege associated with diplomatic …show more content…

This understanding relates to the recognition of the status quo of each state. However, at times a state can assume the position where it challenges the existing order, for example recognizing a new state. Recognition in this case can be used to recognize the existing order. State recognition in international law includes two aspects. Recognition can affect the international legality of the purpose of recognition where the state is considered legal or illegal due to its treatment by other states. Recognition can also be regulated by international law as the states are restricted in their choices regarding recognition. There are two theories that are relevant in state recognition. The first theory provides that states do not exist legally until they are recognized by the international community. This theory follows that the creation of a new state is reliant on the acceptance of other states and the state will have rights after it is recognized. The other theory provides that states attain international recognition when they come into existence. This theory follows that the formation of a state is independent of the consent of other states. Another important aspect in the recognition of a state is the existence of an effective government. Apart from the criterion of the existence of a legal personality of a state an effective government is

Show More
Related
537 Words | 3 Pages

1. Outlines principles of law in relation to variances of an indictment in general, in relation to the “manners and means” of committing a crime. • VARIANCE TO INDICTMENT occurs when facts proved at trial are different from those alleged or specified in the indictment. • MANNERS AND MEANS is the way the crime is done and the method of committing the crime. For example, Zizzi’s wife was beaten/ hit which is the manner and the means/method is either the golf club or the ornament from the bathroom.

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

This form of government

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

Your Honor, my client is pleading guilty to the charges of breaking the Espionage Act. Although Mr. Debs is extremely sorry for the disturbance he has caused but he was only exercising his first amendment right, peacefully. My client is aware, and has a clear understanding in what the Espionage Act is put in place for; the real problem is how could a law such as this exist? The espionage Act is in place to stop treason, and anti -americanism thoughts, but there is not enough war propaganda that exist to prohibit people from realizing war is not completely glorious. Any person that is anti- war does not make them anti-American.

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

The concepts of government and what is needed for a legitimate government date back to the philosophers Locke, Rousseau,

Read More
518 Words | 3 Pages

The first logic that verifies that the concepts were effective in changing the form of government is because

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

Miller v. Alabama One decision can change an adult’s whole life. Should one decision also impact a child’s in the same way? In Miller v. Alabama, the Supreme Court had to determine if laws geared towards adults were constitutional if applied to minors. With a 5-4 split decision, each Supreme Court Justice had to deeply evaluate and compare their morals with the country’s.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

The government would have an imposed authority by an individual or a group that is a made up political system

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

Smuggling drugs has always been an issue because of the demand for them. Illegal espionage was often used to stalk people and to know where they were all the time. Thievery is very simple it is just stealing. Insurance

Read More
889 Words | 4 Pages

To govern oneself as one wished is an attribute of independence. A sovereign state may not be disturbed by another state unless it has given the right to intervene. When a state attaches legal consequences to conduct in another state, it exercises control over that conduct, and when such control affects essential interests in the foreign state, it may constitute an interference with the sovereign rights of that foreign

Read More
914 Words | 4 Pages

An example Krasner gives is that the “statesmen nearly always perceive themselves as constrained by principles, norms, and rules that prescribe and proscribe varieties of behavior”. In short, regimes, not individual states, are fundamental to international relations, which seek to enhance their own national

Read More
1610 Words | 7 Pages

Since,"anarchy is what states make of it,” all states do not need to stress over their relative power and can focus on achieving long term peace.(Wendt, 79-80). While realist classical perspectives point to solely human nature and the anarchical system as the reason for conflict, Wendt provides an example showing that the self identities of states can lead to peace or conflict. He points to defining situations in context history that help determine a state 's interest. He states, “This seems to be happening today in the United States and the former Soviet Union. Without the cold war’s mutual attributions of threat and hostility to define their identities, these states seem unsure of what their ‘interests’

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

In order to compare and contrast varying types of government within two or more countries, one must have a clear definition of Government and know the purposes it serves. Therefore, I did some research and I have established that Government is a group that exercises dominant power over a nation, state, society or other body of people. Governments are commonly responsible for constructing and implementing laws, handling money, and defending the general population from external threats, and may have other obligations or privileges. All over the world, there are many different types of government within countries. Each kind has its advantages as well as disadvantages regarding the general well-being of its peoples and economy.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

It believes that all individuals are born with an increasing desire to own power hardwired inside them. In these circumstances dominant states should do direct high power over their rivals. In the other hand, structural realism does not define the quest for power, instead it is focused on the structure of the international

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

There are reasons for this, first is that, internal implementation of international law is always conditioned by a rule of the state’s municipal law. Clearly stating that international law’ internal interpretation is always governed by the municipal constitution. Second is that in national courts, even a monist country, their courts may fail sometimes to execute treaties which are binding under international law. United State law is an example of non-self-executing treaty. While dualist country’s courts, unincorporated treaties are given limited effect on the internal process.

Read More
2404 Words | 10 Pages

The question is whether a matter is essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of a state or not has to be decided by the Security Council which is controlled by the five permanent members of the United Nations. The availability of the veto power in the hands of the permanent members of the Security Council is a major obstacle in solving international problems. There is no certainty for international law. The international law has failed to maintain order and peace in the world for many

Read More

More about Diplomatic Immunity: The Abuse Of Diplomatic Immunity

Related Topics

Open Document