ipl-logo

Importance Of Judicial Diversity

1008 Words5 Pages

Quoting the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Panel on Judicial Diversity“…there is no quick fix to moving towards a more diverse judiciary. We will achieve significant transformation only if diversity is addressed systematically – not only within the appointments process, but throughout a legal and judicial career. Delivering a more diverse judiciary is not just about recruiting talent wherever it may be found, important though that is, but about retaining talent and enabling capable individuals to reach the top”. Why do we need judicial diversity in the first place? The main reason would be that judicial diversity is an essential requirement of democracy. A judiciary should represent the diversity of society as well as the diversity of the legal …show more content…

There is a near absence of women judges as well as Black, Asian, and minority ethnic judges in the senior judiciary - this subverts the statement of diversity being a requirement of democracy as it denies a fair and equal trial to all eligible members of society. To be a little more exact, currently, only eight out of the thirty eight judges in the Court of Appeal are women. Only 5.1% of judges are of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnicity (BAME). Many developments are currently being tried in practice to increase judicial diversity. The Judicial Diversity Taskforce comprising of the Ministry of Justice, senior members of the Judiciary, the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), the Bar Council, the Law Society and The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, has been set up to try and produce a more diverse judiciary. The Diversity and Community Relations Judges (DCRJs) create and maintain links with local communities and schools to increase knowledge of the justice system, as well as to encourage young people to consider a judicial career. With all developments and efforts made towards judicial diversity, one might wonder why its progression is at a very slow rate. This is because of a notion that under-represented groups are less worthy candidates and that judicial diversity would subvert the quality of …show more content…

The Panel recommended that there should be open and transparent selection processes at all levels; the requirement for candidates for judicial office to be able to demonstrate experience of diversity in either their private or professional lives; and many more. The Committee recommended that the Lord Chancellor and Lord Chief Justice ought to encourage diversity amongst the judiciary; opportunities for flexible working and career breaks within the judiciary ought to be made more widely available to encourage women and others with caring responsibilities; and so

Show More
Related
710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

The appointment of judges has become clearly political. It is not uncommon to hear of candidates making statements with regards to contested political issues as well as the use of partisan language. According to (Bannon, 10) “For neutral arbiters, this heightened political temperature risks exacerbating pressures to decide cases based on political loyalty or expediency, rather than on their understanding of the law.” The selection of judges through popular election therefore suffers serious flaws since the electorate tend to base their decisions on charm instead of serious determinants. The results can be that the person elected as a judge turns out to be one who falls short of the glory of this office in terms of experience, legal training and education.

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

People suffer in the judicial branch due to a lack of knowledge and power that is being withheld. Many people are not aware of the issues that is happening within the branch which typically causes chaos and destruction. Each judge should possess exceptional qualifications of a judge and be free of political

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The quality of judges would without a doubt increase if they were appointed. However, I do not agree with the idea of judges being appointed. When looking at the partisan aspect you notice several possible issues with one issue being, is that individual the right person to do the job. Partisan election of judges allows for an individual that may not be as qualified for the job to be elected into the position. Nevertheless the partisan election of judges gives the voters what they want based on party affiliation along with qualifications.

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

The argument/famous Supreme Court case Madison vs. Marbury asked us the question should the Judicial Branch be able to declare laws unconstitutional. I think the Judicial Branch should be able to declare a law unconstitutional. I believe this because the judicial branch is very small, they have no other checks on any other branch, and they don’t receive any money. The Judicial Branch is so small.

Read More
1776 Words | 8 Pages

You do not want Xlandia to be run on biases. If the people do select who are their judges, then they may be picking who will be kind to them, instead of being fair. You do not want a biased vote when it comes to the Constitution’s laws. We recommend that the Supreme Court should be independent and have the power of judicial review.

Read More
462 Words | 2 Pages

When people think of a good judge they typically think of somebody who is fair, not bias and has some sort of experience. However, in today’s society, particularly in the United States, our judicial selection methods are not made to select judges on their ability to reason well and rule impartially (Carter and Burke, 6). On top of that, judges have no actual training before they become part of the judiciary. The only training they receive is in school when they are studying the law. Sometimes when they pursue an apprenticeship with a judge they also get a little bit more experience or insight into a judge’s job.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

A fair and unbiased court system is necessary for the legal system. The role of the court is to correct any injustice, not to compound it. When prejudice and corruption leak into the courts, what recourse do we have for eradicating them from society? Our judges must be stalwarts of integrity because the power to move our country forward or hold our country back often lies in their hands. Judge Persky had the power to bring justice to a victim, to help her and her family move forward.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

What happens when a particular moral claim is made in a morally defective culture? Ayn Rand explores this question through her novel Atlas Shrugged. Rand is a moralist, albeit of a very different kind than someone like Jonathan Edwards. She sets out a specific, rational morality that is based around human ability and explores the repercussions of moral claims in a society that has rejected rational right and wrong. The heroic characters of her work, particularly Francisco d’Anconia and John Galt, defend her moral code, one that is not muddied by the false virtue of unselfishness -- that of loving others more than oneself, or any self-consuming moral claims of collectivism.

Read More
1311 Words | 6 Pages

“The true measure of our commitment to justice, the character of our society, our commitment to the rule of law, fairness, and equality cannot be measured by how we treat the rich, powerful, the privileged, and the respected among us. The true measure of our character is how we treat the poor, the disfavoured, the accused, the incarcerated, and the condemned” (Stevenson 18). The novel, Just Mercy by Bryan Stevenson, is a true story about the redeeming potential of mercy. It follows a gifted attorney, Bryan Stevenson from Alabama, who founded the Equal Justice Initiative, a legal practice dedicated to defending the poor, the wrongly condemned and those trapped in the criminal justice system. “He has won relief for dozens of condemned prisoners,

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

However, in balancing those flaws with their benefits, America’s judge selection process is satisfactory. Having a mixed system helps to aid in checks and balances between the government and the voting power of the

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

The Color of Justice There are countless injustices in America’s judicial system because of racism, whether it be subconscious or completely conscious. The racism deeply embedded within the American Judicial System needs to be radically reconstructed. Racism has to be recognized and then legally obliterated in order for African American men and women to ever receive a fair treatment by our justice system. The same subconscious racism that results in unfair and prejudicial treatment by judges and juries starts young, at home and in schools.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Judges should be open-minded and fair, and should appear and represent themselves to be fair and open-minded. They should be good listeners but should be able, when required, to ask questions that get to the heart of the issue before the court. They should be respectful in the courtroom but strong whenever it is necessary to overpower a rambling lawyer, a disrespectful litigant or an ill-mannered

Read More
420 Words | 2 Pages

Also, some critics of specialized courts are in favor of traditional adjudication and prefer to go “back to basics” even though evidence shows that specialized courts are effective in their goals in the criminal justice system. Upon an evaluation of the benefits that specialized courts has on a community by way of promoting positive change in individuals to better themselves and the community as a whole, it is recommended that the court administrator move forward with efforts to create specialized courts and support ongoing funding to sustain these types of problem solving

Read More
1577 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction Theoretical assumptions about diversity and contact theory inform the view that a more ethnically diverse criminal justice system will reveal a broader range of voices that can shape and influence policy and attitudinal changes for the better. The focal point of this essay is on the law enforcement branch of the criminal justice system. It makes the argument that diversity in the police force can help reduce levels of racial and ethnic bias as well as disproportionality to the extent that diversity is able to change or influence the occupational and institutional structures that create these disproportionalities. To make this claim, this essay will first show that there are indeed disproportionate outcomes in policing and attempt

Read More

More about Importance Of Judicial Diversity

Related Topics

Open Document