Anyone familiar with Socrates’s reputation would emphatically declare that he was wrongly accused and prosecuted. He was a philosopher of the most pious and truthful nature. He sought truth, with no regard for the material world, and without any hidden agendas. How could a man whose life’s mission was the attainment of knowledge and the pursuit of a just life, be convicted of harming his society? A conviction, punishable by death. Although his reputation may seem to be enough for his defense, it was the same reputation that caused his demise. To reach a conclusion about his innocence we have to look at his trial in light of the social views of his age. We need to look at the charges against him and what they meant in ancient Greek society. …show more content…
Throughout his speech he makes declarations that he is a gift from god and that his presence is of ultimate benefit to the people. One could ask; if he was so wise, why didn’t he just let his actions do the talking instead of telling people of the significance of his presence; and wasn’t he wise enough to realize that people would respect him more and give his opinions more value if he they realized his importance and wisdom for themselves; and didn’t he know that practicing this during his trial would hurt him, and it would end up offending the jury. But to this question wouldn’t Socrates again repeat his words when he says that he is man who speaks the truth. He doe not fear death nor does he restrain from telling the truth because it would possibly not be in his favor. Even when Crito suggests that he run away, he still shows what an upright and strict man of principle he is. He does not care about the consequences of speaking the truth. If it means that his life would be in danger, so be it. This is a reason that makes the whole account really sad. The Athenians could not see what a treasure they had in Socrates, even though he verbally claimed so. He did what was right for the reason that it was right, without fear and hesitance. Surely, that is the path to be followed by a truly noble man. Although, it would be wrong to say that such brutal nobility can cause a man much trouble in the company of people who are not willing to be as strong of character. Furthermore, there may be a hint of arrogance and disregard for others in such a character. But- when a man is right, a man is