Incarceration On Family

1677 Words7 Pages

In the qualitative analysis of Murray (2012), parents are both an affirmative agent of socialization and of social control. While a parent is incarcerated they are either unable to maintain their influence at all towards to their children, or can only act in a restricted capacity. By means of parent are the role models to all children. If a parent is incarcerated it could change the perception of the chid to their parents.
Bestowing to The Pew Charitable Trusts (2010), parents who go to prison or jail are unable to provide financially for their children while they are incarcerated, and due to the loss of income and institutionalized stigma that come with being incarcerated, they often have difficulty finding sustainable employment once they …show more content…

If offenders have had a negative influence on the family, removal of these individuals and their problematic behaviors may ultimately result in improvement of the family’s situation. For instance, Arditti, Smock, and Parkman, (2005), in domestic violence situations, the removal of an offender can serve to beneficially affect the family in that abusive behavior will cease; however the family may be negatively impacted financially and socially. Therefore, the consequences of imprisonment on the family are complex in that they cannot merely be characterized as positive or negative. Additionally, it has been found that many fathers view the transition back into the family as an opportunity to “start over” and become a responsible parent. Although Arditti, Acock, and Day, (2005) stated that, limited existing research about incarcerated fathers revealed that fathers behind bars expressed an appropriate understanding of the meaning and nature of good parenting continued to see themselves as “good fathers” and “close to their child” even from within prison …show more content…

After leaving the physical incarceration, UK Essays publication disclosed that ex-offenders entered another prison cells due to social stigma they experienced making them feel difficult to live for the second time.
Furthermore, Davis (2014) found the same results and underscored that on the outside, the stigma attached to the ex-convicts is one of the causes of their unemployment. In this situation, many incarcerated fathers after their incarceration suffers from deprivation to cope-up to their second change in socializing to the people around them. On the other hand, the National Institute of Justice (2013) emphasized that employment after imprisonment provides ex-convicts motivation to live. Such disclosure negates the fact that employment is commonly one of the challenges former ex-convicts embark on because almost every employer will look after the applicant’s background bearing his/her previous experience and recommendation and no further than their criminal