ipl-logo

Indian Land Of Tears Analysis

188 Words1 Pages

The US Congress, in 1830, voted on the issue of what rights Indians had to land and independence in North America, continuing a discussion older than the American colonies. In America, a land of immigrants, the question of whose rights were primary, and on what basis, was centuries old. According to their traditions the Indian communities of the Cherokee people had lived in their homeland in southeastern North
America for centuries.1 Little interested in Indian traditions, officials of the State of
Georgia were waging a campaign to expel the Cherokee from within the borders the state had negotiated with the federal government in 1802. With the election of Andrew
Jackson in 1828, Georgia had gained an ally in the White House who also had a program …show more content…

In debating Indian Removal, Congress was discussing the dispossession and expulsion of independent Indian communities in the eastern half of North America. The debate was not a new one, but was set in terms of the principles and experience of a country with

Show More
Related
622 Words | 3 Pages

“The settler colonial logic of elimination in its crudest form, a violent rejection of all things Indian, was transformed into a paternalistic mode of governmentality which, though still sanctioned by state violence, came to focus on assimilation rather than rejection.” –Patrick Wolfe, After the Frontier: Separation and Absorption in US Indian Policy, 13 Wolfe’s statement illustrates how the US government put more emphasis on legalized absorption of Indians into the White society rather than using forceful and violent methods to acquire the Natives’ land. After the colonization of the westward land and the end of the Frontier era, the US government’s method of assimilation of the Indians started revolving around allotment and blood quanta. With no place to further push the Natives away, the established Bureau of Indian Affairs and the government took action to eliminate the Natives culturally and spiritually instead of physically.

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

In the book, The Cherokee Removal, Perdue and Green argue that the Cherokee Nation was treated unfairly by the U.S. Government in the 1800s. The majority of Americans were not fond of the Native Americans, and the Americans felt as if the Native Americans were on their rightfully owned property. Perdue and Green display how the states were trying to remove the Natives when they write, “A state could use its legal institutions to make life for Indians so miserable that they would gladly sell their lands and flee to the West” (Perdue and Green, 73).

Read More
1501 Words | 7 Pages

The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The second case that reached the Supreme Court concerning land ownership happened on 1831 and was given the name of Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. This case’s ruling expressed that Indians did not have a United States nationality, but they were not members of foreign states either, which ultimately appointed their tribes to be “domestic dependent nations.” In other words, although there was a distant relationship between the U.S. and the Indian tribes, the United States was still responsible for imparting well-being advantages, needs, and services for the natives since they were entitled over the Indian

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

"It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people." -- Andrew Jackson’s speech about the Indian Removal Act of 1830 in 1830. The Cherokee are a Native American Tribe that live in Oklahoma and North Carolina, and have lived there for decades. In 1830, Andrew Jackson (the president during this time) was mad because the Cherokee Indians had been hurting and scalping people in Georgia. Because of this, Jackson put up the idea of a removal act, a way to get the Cherokee to either move out of Georgia or abide by state law.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

But this time according to the appeal on the Law made in 1830 which prohibited whites from living on Indian territory after March 31, 1831, without a license from that state. So when with the Supreme Court they decided that the Cherokee did not have a right to keep and have their own government in their land, the Georgia extensions of the state's law to be agents the law. From the Indian Removal Act you can see that Andrew Jackson different Values and beliefs than the CHerokees. Andrew Jackson valued American Progress and expansion, because he wanted and continuously was trying to remove the indians out of their land because he believed that they were obstacles to the american progress.

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Unlike the others, cherokee nation tried to face this problem in democratic way. Instead of going on the war path the way their older generation might have done, this generation of cherokee indians took georgia to court. The case got very big and it went to the “United States Supreme Court”. In the harsh winter of 1838 cherokee people were forced to march over a thousands of miles from their home in Georgia to what is now oklahoma. They made the journey with limited supplies and transportation.

Read More
1959 Words | 8 Pages

Being in the middle of the South, the Creek Indians were surrounded by plantation owners and frontiersmen on all sides along with the Cherokee Indians. Being surrounded on all sides, they were in constant conflict with white protestors and squatters who believed they had a right to settle and obtain Indian land. The squatters did this with no actual approval, but a belief in Georgia is sovereign, and was not. The problem is that Georgia failed to recognize that the Creeks had proclaimed themselves their own sovereign state. But Georgia believed that the United States Constitution made this null and void.

Read More
1951 Words | 8 Pages

This clearly shows that there was political bias and the state government was acting reactively instead of acting proactively and looking at the losses the Cherokees would face. This then instigated the case Cherokee Nation v. Georgia. In June 1830, a delegation of Cherokee led by John Ross and William Wirt, attorney general in the Monroe Administration, were selected to obtain a federal injunction against laws that were passed by the Georgia state legislature depriving them of their rights within the state borders (“Cherokee Nation v. Georgia”). They claimed that Georgia created laws that “go directly to annihilate the Cherokees as a political society,” and since they were a foreign government, Georgia’s laws were not legally binding to them. As a counter, Georgia was trying to make the point that the Cherokee Nation was not a foreign government because they did not have

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

Igniting the nation’s conscience, Helen Hunt Jackson’s A Century of Dishonor exploits the federal government’s shameful and duplicitous mistreatment and injustice imposed on the Native Americans. Helen constructs her novel with details that testifies the prejudice against the Indians in hopes of stimulating social change. In contrast with Andrew Jackson’s On Indian Removal, which was inclined for the proposal of Indian removal, Helen delivers a more valid argument exposing the wrongdoings inflicted upon the Native Americans by expansionist Americans. Jackson first exploits the horrid discrimination the Native Americans faced.

Read More
524 Words | 3 Pages

The courts of Georgia agreed with the Cherokees and passed a ruling that they Cherokee Indians were not required to move. President Jackson overruled this ruling and sent armed

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

Forced Move of The Cherokee Nation The forced move of the Cherokee nation was not a correct action taken by the government at that point of history. It was unfair for the Cherokees, most strongly disagree with the treaty, it violated the Cherokee’s rights, and caused many to die. it also failed to follow the constitution It was very unfair for the Cherokees to be removed from their homeland, where their ancestors have lived and made it their home.

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

President Jackson was far from done, he passed the Indian removal bill, which was arguably the cruelest law passed by the United States government. It called for exchanging Indian territories in the East for the land west of the Mississippi River. Many people, including American citizens, themselves, objected to the Indian Removal Act. A deeply Christian man by the name of Frelinghuysen, questioned the statement of the American nation having native ‘brothers’. The Indian Removal Act proved how the United States government stole the land that the Cherokees called home.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Indian Land Of Tears Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document