The article I read is about "informal primatology." The author focuses on three points with evidence to prove that there is actually not a wide seperation between sociocultural anthropology and primatology.The author's first point is to state primatology has actually gain from the humanist tradition of reflexivity. Second, the author points to indicate how the largely anthropogenic circumstances in which primate populations lives has stem in two growths for anthropological primatolog. The author's last point is to state how primates conversation can learn from recent studies on the anthropology of