Injustices In Susan Glaspell's 'Jury Of Her Peers'

909 Words4 Pages

Examples of real-life injustices in the United States, include racism, abuse, poverty, and starvation. The current justice system to certain demographics. This can be seen in recent news stories with African Americans being on trail. Some innocent people go to prison for their lifetime, and it is out of their own control. Therefore, the United States justice system has been acting unfair due to the fact that some innocent people are proven guilty.
In the case of the “Jury of her Peers” by Susan Glaspell, ”Both sides portrayed Margaret Hossack in ways that heavily relied on stereotypical views on women and marriage” (Byran 1035). Margaret could have been convicted either way, which brings the point that they did not convict her before her death. From stating the quote above, women are not being suspects when it comes from a husband’s death, which needs to fixed. Most of the current real-life injustices makes the justice system look unacceptable. Murderers are effortlessly released if the evidence is not substantial enough to help close the case. There are quite a few innocent people behind bars because they accused falsely. …show more content…

In one of her stories, a woman named Minnie Wright is accused of killing her husband. The story was written by the neighbors point of view which at that point they went to check on how she was doing. She seems decent, but was not but, the neighborhood men do not question her as a suspect. Her husband may have been abusing her, which leads the neighbors to thinking of reasons why she wanted her husband dead. This story shows how people can be sexist in quite a few ways. For example, the only duties of a women in that time was to be a housewife and nothing more. Meaning women meant nothing in the early