Harpo C. Chord (п) was offered to play the piano during dinner at Tres Trendi, an upscale restaurant in the theater district. (∆). Even though п did not have this in mind for his career opportunity, due to financial situation being depleted, accepted the K. ∆ was a restaurant in the theater district, and many participants were influential in the arts, п saw this as an opportunity and accepted the offer on January 15th, and entered a K with ∆. The K had promised that he would play piano during dinner from 8pm-midnight every night for the month. П’s performance would begin on February 1st, and would be paid “the going rate” for his piano playing. Neither party knew what the market rate was for a dinner pianist. ∆ would make inquiries and tell П as soon as they found out (∆). Unfortunately, the П was not contacted for a week and, therefore, contacted the manager to find out the rate of compensation. The manager told him that the …show more content…
П had troubles during the month of February due to the expectancy of playing at ∆. П was not able to mitigate his loss by finding suitable employment. П missed out on numerous contacts and creating a chance to promote his music, which caused further damage to П’s benefits. П, in recourse, could satisfy the courts by showing the market value of a dinner piano player at an upscale restaurant. П would also be able to sue for what he would’ve earned if the breach of K did not happen. П would need to be able to prove evidence of the “going rate” to a pianist of his skill for a similar work in the similar type of restaurant. This evidence would come from Tres Trendi (∆) who took the obligation to find the “going rate.” Again, П could also prove to the court that he also missed out on potential contacts he would’ve met if he started the K on February 1st. П would be able to prove that ∆ dishonored the K and П are due back pay by the