ipl-logo

Insanity Defense Essay

634 Words3 Pages

The aim of this essay is to critically analyze the current status of the use of insanity as a defense within a court of law. In order to do so this essay will do the following ****. This essay will attempt to draw a conclusion as to whether or not the current legislation in place is sufficient to ensure that society is protected. In the recent decades within Ireland it had been called that the laws governing the defense of insanity were to be reformed. The factors that have led to the slowness are low rates of crime, absence of public interest and political motivation about the crime until the 1960’s. Reformation somewhat came in 2006 with the introduction of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act. Although it is felt that it did not do enough to address the issues at hand. And in cases of insanity the common law is still heavily relied on as it mainly focussed on the procedural aspects of insanity. The most substantive change was the introduction of the …show more content…

“A man must be presumed sane and a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes until the contrary is proved… to establish a defence of insanity it must be clearly proved that at the time of committing the act, the accused was labouring under a defect of reason from a disease of the mind as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, and if he did know it, that he did not know what he was doing was wrong”

A set of rules arose from the judgement of this case, and they are still relevant today. They are as follows.
“(1) A partial delusion will be no defence if the defendant still knew that his actions were against the law.
(2) Every person is presumed to be sane and therefore accountable for his actions, until the contrary is

Show More
Related
63 Words | 1 Pages

The Supreme Court tested again the procedure and criterion of competency for execution of a mental illness defendant in 2007 in Panetti v. Quarterman (Panetti I). The Supreme Court ruled in Panetti that to be executed an inmate must not only be aware of the reason for his execution, the inmate must have a rational comprehension of the State’s reasoning for his

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

This phase caused three different psychiatrists to come in and testify on Brom’s mental state. The testimonies would be held up against the M'Naghten Rule. The 140 year old standard which holds that a criminal defendant can’t be held responsible for a crime if he did not know the nature of his act or that it was morally wrong. There was a huge argument in this case over whether or not David Brom was mentally insane. Seven out of the eight health professionals who evaluated David found him to be mentally competent.

Read More
1344 Words | 6 Pages

There is also an inclination to believe that if he had not suffered from this state, then the offence would not have been committed, specially not in the barbaric way it was done. Thus, it cannot be concluded that the accused willfully preformed the act, nor that the mens rea and the actus reus coincided while he was not in a psychotic state. (Roach, 113) Related to this finding is another element that supports the verdict of the Honorable Judge, which is the Principle of Fundamental Justice that states that no one should be “punished for morally involuntary actions.” (Roach, 82) A person who successfully raises the mental disorder defence is considered to be morally innocent of the act because they were not acting freely, in this case, free from psychotic ideations.

Read More
1864 Words | 8 Pages

Ayla’s conduct was ultimately influenced by her mental instability and is subject to the law of section 2 of the Criminal Code of Canada [hereinafter, Code], the fitness to stand trial, and 16(1), which is the defence of mental disorder. Though these two laws may appear to be similar with one another as they handle offenders with mental disorders, they have distinct features and case laws which sets them apart, providing crucial elements for fairness of trial regarding those who are Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD). At the end of the trial, Ayla’s disposition will be determined if she is found to be NCRMD by the Crown. Before one can plead for NCRMD, one must undergo the test for fitness to stand trial.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

Dr. Mark Nolan, Senior Lecturer at ANU College of Law, says that the NGRI plea “enables defendants to avoid criminal liability and standard criminal punishment” (Nolan 8). The main disagreement with America is the focus whether if the “guilty defendant” pursues to misuse the “Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity” as an alternative to imprisonment or if the criminally accused was at the time of committing the crime “clinically insane” and in need psychotherapy. Therefore, during this discussion of opposing viewpoints concerning the insanity defense being misused or ethical are going to be

Read More
1528 Words | 7 Pages

In the field of criminal law there is a certain type of criminal defense that comes to the court and has a low success rate. These cases concern the mental capacity of the defendant and if they have enough mental capacity, or are sane enough, to be aware of their crime and consequences of crime. The insanity defense is extremely rare because of how difficult it is for the defense to prove to the court and jury that the defendant did not have the mental capacity to understand what they did wrong and the consequences from it. The case of Myers III v. State of Indiana is one example of criminal responsibility and mental capacity. This case has information that can be connected to the textbook with the insanity defense tests, mental competence

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

The first time I heard about the insanity plea was in the Andrea Yates case back in 2001. Yates was class valedictorian when she was in high school with a good background.

Read More
1669 Words | 7 Pages

What exactly is the insanity defense? In a criminal trial situation the insanity defense is used to explain that the defendant was not responsible for his or her actions at the time the crime was committed due to a mental health illness or a mental handicap. Now you have to think of the reasoning, is this form of defense used as an actual defense for one who irresponsibly committed a crime or as a last resort hoping for an acquittal before a defendant is about to be handed a guilty verdict? Most people being asked would say it is being used for sane people trying to get out of a crime they committed, but I believe the insanity defense is misunderstood by society and should strictly be used for its creation of mentally ill individuals.

Read More
1960 Words | 8 Pages

Justice Tindall, whom was present at the M’Naughten trial when the insanity plea became a legal defense, breaks these rules into 3 statements. “Every person is presumed sane unless the contrary can be proven otherwise” (Allnut, et al. 293), which in this case it cannot. “A person suffering a ‘partial delusion’ should be dealt with as if the circumstances of the delusion was real” (Allnut, et al. 293). If Minnie was suffering from some sort of delusions, she would have used that as an excuse once Mr. Hale found her or would’ve had some crazy story on what happened. She got straight to the point.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

“A mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior. Insanity is distinguished from low intelligence or mental deficiency due to age or injury. If a complaint is made to law enforcement, to the District Attorney or to medical personnel that a person is evidencing psychotic behavior, he/she may be confined to a medical facility long enough (typically 72 hours) to be examined by psychiatrists who submit written reports to the local superior/county/district court. ” This is the definition of insanity, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I, Andrew Harris, am here today to convict Mr. Johnson of murdering Mr. Pete. Mr. Johnson killed Mr. Pete on October twentieth, eighteen twenty.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

There are three tests that are used in criminal justice to decide if a defendant was suffering insanity at the time of a murder. Each test includes of many essentials to govern what an offender may have been going through or if he or she is suffering from mental illness. On the other hand, some offenders may have been suffering from an injury while another might be playing the role in an effort to be set free by a motive of pretending to be insane. It has been documented that some wrongdoers who commit crimes are blind-sided because of the lack of knowledge due to insanity. That does not mean that this person is not going to receive some type of repercussion for his or her actions, but there are a series of tests that must take place before a determination

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, by Ken Kesey, considers the qualities in which society determines sanity. The label of insanity is given when someone is different from the perceived norm. Conversely, a person is perceived as sane when their behavior is consistent with the beliefs of the majority. Although the characters of this novel are patients of a mental institution, they all show qualities of sanity. The book is narrated by Chief Brodmen, an observant chronic psychiatric patient, who many believe to be deaf and dumb.

Read More
49 Words | 1 Pages

How fair is the “insanity” defense? Davis (2016) argued that the used of the “insanity” defense may be seen by others as unfair to other criminals because of the leniency towards one group of criminals and not others. This can be seen as discrimination towards individuals with mental illness.

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

“It was discovered that one psychiatrist, Park Dietz, had given testimony that turned out to be untrue. He had claimed that Yates got her idea to drown the children from an episode of Law and Order. It turned out that he had confused the plots of multiple episodes” (Andrea Yates, 2021). It was during this trial that Andrea Yates was found not guilty by the reason of insanity and was sent to a maximum-security state mental facility. The M'Naghten Rule, which states “all defendants are presumed to be sane unless they can prove that–at the time of committing the criminal act–the defendant’s state of mind caused them to (1) not know what they were doing when they committed said act, or (2) that they knew what they were doing, but did not know that it was wrong”

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

The Death penalty relates heavily with mentally ill offenders and furthers the idea of its injustice and immorality through the M’Naghten Rule. The National Mental Health Association concludes that as many as 370 offenders with severe mental illness are awaiting execution —up to 1 of every 10 prisoners on death row. The justice system does not adequately address cases involving criminal defendants with mental illness. (Silverstein 28).Capote understands the connection between capital punishment and mental illness. Constantly within the novel, the mental illnesses of Perry and Dick are made present and the immorality of capital punishment as well.

Read More

More about Insanity Defense Essay

Related Topics

Open Document