ipl-logo

Internet Privacy: The Case For Internet Surveillance

703 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Should government control the internet

"The Case For Internet Surveillance
Internet is a touchy subject in today’s modern times. It has been discussed on serious places like the CNN and Fox but it has also been used as jokes for comedy’s like South Park. Weather or not any form of government should monitor our internet content is the discussion of debate. Citizens have the right to privacy and the government shouldn’t be allowed to break that right. However, government supervision can keep and make the world a safer place. There isn’t one side to this argument. There should be a balance between freedoms/privacy and surveillance about what’s happening on the internet.
Privacy is an important part to the American culture. Examples of privacy can be found in multiple amendments …show more content…

People like to feel safe. They like to know that they don’t have to worry about being shot or harmed when they walk out the door. Internet surveillance helps to an extent. Too much surveillance and supervision is bad though. It keeps people paranoid and makes them think that every move they do or question they look up will be watched. Internet surveillance is bad because it’s there forever. When the government is looking at what its citizens research it saves every click that happens. That data is there forever and can be obtained by anyone which id the wrong person has that much information, bad things can happen. If the government never monitors the internet in the first place than nothing can be saved (Buren). An example of saved information coming back to hurt the person is Ken Bone. Ken Bone was a funny looking man who was seen at a Trump speech. He went viral after that. People decided to looked at and hacked into his Reddit account and found all skirts of weird and inappropriate videos and post. Now his life is probably affect extremely and ruined because he went to a Trump campaign. If the government hadn’t saved everything the man did then obtaining his private account wouldn’t have been so easy. Apart from affecting everyone too much surveillance will affect people’s lives personally. People won’t have as meaningful of conversations over the internet or social media because they’ll be afraid of people

Show More
Related
506 Words | 3 Pages

It begins to create a want or need for increased security. How can a nation watch itself all at once, including those who may be undercover? The answer is presented by surveillance. If all individuals are being watched and listened to than the chances of preventing an attack are heightened. At what cost?

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Government surveillance is more prevalent than ever, and it is more out in the open than ever. This proves how government surveillance is often invasive and often defended by the judicial system created to protect the citizens, but instead attacks

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

It gives us a broad view of how devious our government can be towards their private situations. One of the main consequences that government faces as a result of their secrets is the distrust they receive from America today. Our government can asks us to participate in their desire to know more of us but refuses to inform us with the truth. Instead of giving up our rights to our government we should be protecting them. Therefore, it is absurd that there is even a debate on whether or not we should allow our government to monitor our personal

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

This PowerPoint is used to explain the two sides of this debatable topic, but putting more focus on one of them. Personally, I think that surveillance can be beneficial to the country, and this can be addressed in three ways: ethos, logos, and pathos. Ethos is believing in the claim because there is a person of power, or a recognized face advertising it. I used George Bush in this

Read More
1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More
169 Words | 1 Pages

In the article written by Nicholas Carr, Tracking is an Assault on Liberty, he divulges the ideas that our civil liberties on the internet are under attack which leaves an imminent danger on our individual privacies. The article covers topics pertaining to the urgent awareness of the violation to citizens privacy online, the obtainment of our personal information being recorded through our IP addresses and computers, and the idea that the retainment of our personal information can withhold an influence on our behaviors and thoughts. The article holds a more negative stance on the violation of people privacy with warning and educating people to take prerogative to preserve their privacy. This article further educates the audience

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

By using strong supporting arguments In the essay entitled, Everyone is Watching You, by Nadine Strossen. Strossen’s goal in the essay is to influence her readers that surveillance cameras do more damage than good, and that something needs to be done to eliminate them. Her controversy on this matter was very vigorous, Strossen convincingly argues that surveillance cameras are an atrocious idea and needs to be stopped. She does a satisfying job of catering to her viewers in her essay. With a topic that pertains to everybody, she takes the opportunity to use this to her convenience.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

There are many constitutional implications of government spying programs, one of those being a complete violation of privacy here in the United States. Snowden himself exposed the NSA, as he noted that calls were recorded and various other electronic data were collected on many individuals and kept for future use. There is no denying that the use of spying programs violates an American’s 4th amendment and it often leads to people refraining from posting something controversial due to the fear of being watched. Ever since the WikiLeaks documents were publicized, many people feel paranoid, and rightly so. People used to be able to talk, post and do anything they wanted to with complete freedom.

Read More
798 Words | 4 Pages

It is very important to use surveillance, but if you use it unjustly it can give more power to public order than individual rights. It causes a similar problem as the ones mentioned before, that it can prove challenging to identify if you had a good reason to use surveillance. You might not always know if you have a good enough reason to use surveillance, but you should exercise your best judgement to decide whether or not to use

Read More
1370 Words | 6 Pages

Domestic Surveillance does have its opponents though. Those against it argue how costly the program is, with it costing on average $574 per United States taxpayer every year, which far exceeds the government's estimates of it costing only $35 billion dollars. “After good estimates about 14% of the country's total intelligence budget -- or about $10 billion -- goes to the NSA” (What the NSA costs taxpayers). Not only does it prove cost ineffective, but the government does not show the public the results of Domestic Surveillance, giving only vague numbers as to how they stop terrorist and domestic threats. Those against Domestic Surveillance bring up the point that it infringes on our constitutional right of privacy, saying that the government sifting through vast amounts of metadata is breaking the amendment, making Domestic Surveillance unconstitutional.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

While there are still debates on the exact scope of government surveillance, the fact that there have been steps taken to limit its excesses shows that the United States values individual rights. As technology advances and security threats evolve, it will be important for policymakers to continue to evaluate the role of surveillance in national security and ensure that privacy protections are not sacrificed in the name of

Read More
1390 Words | 6 Pages

Surveillance is becoming increasingly integrated into human lives. Seemingly inconsequential minutiae like how long one spends in line at a grocery store or how many times a headline is clicked on a social media site are collected automatically by both public and private institutions. Whatever we do and wherever we go, there is likely some trace of it. This has led to great debates about the right to privacy, how much surveillance is too much, and under what circumstances surveillance is justifiable. Film and Television play important roles in these debates and in the way in which the public conceptualizes the utility and threat of surveillance more generally.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

We need energy for so many things. We use it to keep our food fresh, light up our house, and for many other things. We can’t live without it. Wind and Nuclear energy would bring many benefits to Illinois. These energy generators would work well in this community because there is water in Illinois and nuclear fission generators need to be near water.

Read More
1315 Words | 6 Pages

(Bilton, 2013) Surveillance of search engines permits information to be monitored so that if any hazardous search word like how to make bomb is looked it up several times by someone then it can be identified (Anon, 2014). Also, watching over the public assists police to capture crime suspects so that government organizations can protect national security (mass surveillance 위키피디아) To be specific, after terrible incident occurred in September 11, 2001, government of United States enacted the Patriot Act which stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. The act was signed by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001 in the name of declaring war with terrorism. (위키피디아) The law grants the right to Federal Bureau of Investigation to profile people who fit certain stereotypes so that potential crime and potential terror can be prevented.

Read More
853 Words | 4 Pages

However, in the 21st century surveillance is used in different and very complicated ways. So many crimes and terrorist attacks forced governments around the world to use electronic surveillance to protect their own people. This electronic surveillance is very complicated. You don’t even know it’s happening and you are the

Read More

More about Internet Privacy: The Case For Internet Surveillance

Related Topics

Open Document