Intimate Partner Violence Case Study

My chosen issue is Intimate partner violence. One of New Zealand’s increasing issues is Intimate partner violence (IPV). IPV is recognized as a leading public health threat and a major social issue. IPV is observed as one of the world’s prime human rights concerns due to its widespread. As exemplified by New Zealand legislation the Domestic Violence Act 1995 considers IPV to form a category of family violence. (Krug et al. 2002, Tolan et al. 2006). According to the Act, IPV involves an individual perpetrating violence against another person with whom that individual is or has been in a domestic relationship. Those people that are at increased risk of advancing mental and physical health problems including depression, chronic pain, gastrointestinal

Anyone can be a victim of domestic violence such as all ages, races, and education levels. Domestic violence is a crime that can do great harm to an innocent individual’s life. According to women’s refuge website they help a woman every six minutes on their crisis line. In result to that, this show thousands of New Zealanders life has been affected. Crime and injury statistics show domestic violence is a significant problem in New Zealand. It is one of the vital reasons of injury and death to women, and also gives guidance to short and long-term health problems. Furthermore a study by Janet Fanslow and Elizabeth Robinson shows, between 33 to 39% of New Zealand women experience physical or sexual violence from an intimate partner in their lifetime. (Fanslow, J & Elizabeth Robinson 2004). Both adults and children can be victims. Different types of violence studies have categorised different kinds of domestic violence. Power and control violence involves psychological abuse, often accompanied by physical and sexual

Family is seen as a social institution thus it also serves the entire community. It is functional to capital compile and capitalism favours to maintain the family working well as a social system. The Family is viewed as a system of expenditure. It is a support system for social reproduction for labour. It is as work incentive for labour; women accept domestic duties and it actions as the socialization agent for promoting capitalistic ethic. For capitalism, men are classified to work outside the house and become breadwinner for their family. Their role is to meet the society’s needs and comfort for their family as well as advance the social consumption with the money earned by day-to-day work. For women, their role is to nurture for the men and children who are the future labour funds for society. Example of this can be; women are viewed as a supporter behind the stage. All they need to do is support their husbands and children without complaint. To manage the family, both women and men have the duties but the division is disparate. In addition, capitalists make the job market vaster but specific in each single field. That is to say the division of work becomes specific and one is embedded into one position which makes the work more efficient. Just like the division in the job market, when women and men are set respectively into different positions, therefore an