Into The Wild: A Narrative Analysis
In 1965, a small time family with big time dreams are caught up in the biggest drug smuggling operation in United States history. The family includes Jeff and Annie Hobbitt, as well as their two children, Bobbi and Georgia Hobbitt. The Hobbitt’s smuggled drugs from Mexico on numerous occasions before Georgia was pulled over by Texas State Troopers in 1968 in which she began to believe that their big time operation was under fire; thus, her father, the chemist, began manufacturing crack cocaine. Jeff contributed to five other states for crack cocaine, his son and daughter collected the money, while transporting the merchandise back and forth from the surrounding states. Annie, the mother and wife, created a large barrier around their lab by purchasing razor wire fencing and planted numerous trees around the area for camouflage.
Rhetorical Analysis of Jon Krakauer’s “Into the Wild ” Jon Krakauer ’s purpose in writing Into the Wild is to recount Chris McCandless’ journey, physical and metaphysical, from college in Georgia to his death in Alaska, through the use of factual, and anecdotal evidence. Krakauer uses factual evidence to establish that he is a trustworthy narrator capable of giving the reader a realistic scope on the events in the story. Jon uses anecdotal evidence to see into Chris’ psyche from the various perspectives found in the book’s excerpts, including how Jon understands the events.
Christopher Johnson McCandless, also known as Alexander Supertramp was found dead in 1992 in the stampede trail by a group of Alaskan hunters. While visiting Denali National Park and Preserve on a yearly excursion. They radio for help and the FBI arrives and removes the body. Chris traveled extensively in the west of the United States. He traveled as his own view of what life was.
In Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer and The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, it is shown how negatively life-altering crossing physical and mental borders can be. In Into the Wild, Chris McCandless decides after he graduates college to abandon his previous life. He completely distances himself from modern society as he fulfills his dream of hitchhiking to Alaska. The Things They Carried tells the stories of American soldiers that are serving in the Vietnam War and shows the heavy toll that war takes on them. Both novels display the impacts of border crossing; including a blurred line of what is acceptable, an abuse of freedom, and isolation.
Once again, we are tasked with writing another QVSR paper. “Find an epigraph that explains Krakauer’s purpose in writing this book”. In the guidelines, however, we received a very interesting thought to dwell on, “What is Krakauer’s purpose in this book?” Initially I was prepared to write this paper, and not even think for a second about why he might have wanted to script this nonfiction book. As you can already tell from my title, I think there is a simply explanation for that.
The Stampede Trail is a beautiful expanse of land surrounded by lush forests and the creatures native to them. Following this path, one comes across a gurgling river and beyond that an expanse of land where a bus is located. This bus has been here for ages and serves as a resting place for hunters or hikers. In this serene picture, though, a young man tragically met his demise whilst on a journey of self-discovery. This man was Christopher McCandless, an enigmatic 24-year-old who gave up all he ever knew for a life of wandering.
A journalist by the name of Jon Krakauer wrote the book “Into The Wild”. He used this piece of literature to persuade to the audience that McCandless is inspiring and courageous role model. Going out into the world showed how others can connect to Mccandless and it would withhold judgment. An inspiring person is someone who shows others the urge or ability to do or feel something that may be creative,risk taking and or challenging. Krakauer is proving how McCandlesses adventurous actions proves he had a lot of courage meaning he was not deterred by danger or pain.
Chris McCandless from the book “Into the Wild” by Jon Krakauer is a character who is extremely well liked by all. His smarts give him the ability to hold conversations with a variety of different people. Chris does not use his knowledge in a negative way that causes people to think that he is arrogant, it just comes out of him naturally, leaving many people impressed by the young boy. Through his character, I learned how much intelligence can truly add to one's personality. Chris is subconsciously phenomenal at speaking with new people due to his wide range of knowledge.
Krakauer’s purpose throughout the story is to get to his readers, and tell the story about a young man that had it all but shows us that money wasn’t everything. Chris McCandless went to one of the best schools he and his family were living a good life but that wasn’t what Chris wanted anymore. I think what the author really wanted us to focus on is that money can’t buy your happiness. Chris didn’t want to be there anymore he didn’t want to be living that lifestyle. Therefore he gave up everything he had and donated most of his savings money to charity and went off into the wild.
Anyone can have a story in their life and can turn it into a book. Jon Krakauer wrote Into the Wild on what happened to Christopher McCandless and turned his story into a novel. Jon Krakauer´s structure his novel to let the reader have their own opinions on Christopher McCandless by stating the book is on his bias viewpoint, putting it in non-chronological order, and wrote about his own background life story, which is all important to strengthen Krakauer 's motive of writing his book. Into the Wild, focuses on the young individual named Christopher McCandless who hitchhiked to Alaska. Along the way, in his journey, he met new people and traveled in many places.
Oftentimes in literature, using magic is portrayed in a way that results in conflict. In the play, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, Shakespeare uses magic to create dissension between the characters. For instance, magic was used in a love spell, which later strained the relationship between Lysander and Hermia, created tension within Helena’s and Hermia’s friendship, and catalyzed Titania’s love for Bottom. Initially, Lysander and Hermia both love each other, but Lysander is put under a magical spell which causes him to fall in love with Helena. Because of this, Hermia and Lysander begin to feud and tarnish their relationship.
Tyrone went with his father for part of 1931, after his parents divorced. His father died from a heart attack in December 1931 while getting ready to film The Miracle Man. Tyrone Power Jr. was his nickname from then on. Even though he suffered this tragedy, he decided to continue his efforts to become an actor. He looked everywhere he could for acting offers, but they only offered praise for his father, but no work for his son.
Into the Wild portrays freedom in a sense that Christopher McCandless wants to venture out into the world, even though he had it all. Chris changes his way of life as he gives all of his personal items away as well as; $25,000 from his bank account, his car, and eventually his life. Reasons being that he leaves and does this, is due to the fact that he wants to be on his own and does not want people to depend on him as well as him having the feeling of having to require the obligations of the people around him. Chris had his next two years of college already paid for him by his family. Chris then goes on to tell his parents “I think I’m going to disappear for a while.”
Jon Krakauer’s Into the Wild investigates the life and adventures of Chris McCandless. The author provides information about Chris’ life to illuminate his journey. Krakauer also uses rhetorical appeals to defend Chris’ rationale for his journey. Through Krakauer’s use of pathos, ethos, and logos, he persuades the audience that Chris is not foolish; however, Krakauer’s intimacy with Chris and his adventures inhibits his objectivity.
What really drove Chris McCandless into the wild? I believe the top three of the countless reasons that drove McCandless into the wild was the emotional damage from his parents, rebellion of the youth & risk taking tendencies, and his hubris and detestation against authority and/or someone telling him what to do. Some may believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild because of his literary heroes Leo Tolstoy, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau , and Jack London but the real reason he left everything was because of those reasons. In this essay I will elaborate on why I believe those are the reasons that drove McCandless into the wild.
More about Into The Wild: A Narrative Analysis
Annie Hobbitt Research Paper
222 Words | 1 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Into The Wild
920 Words | 4 PagesInto The Wild Chris Mccandless Sparknotes
1302 Words | 6 PagesComparing Into The Wild 'And The Things They Carried By Tim O' Brien
931 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Into The Wild By Jon Krakauer
592 Words | 3 PagesChris Mccandless Journey In Into The Wild By Jon Krakauer
1067 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis Of Into The Wild By Jon Krakauer
291 Words | 2 PagesInto The Wild Chris Mccandless Essay
667 Words | 3 PagesPurpose Of Into The Wild By Jon Krakauer
1442 Words | 6 PagesStructure Of Into The Wild
748 Words | 3 PagesA Midsummer Night's Dream Research Paper
717 Words | 3 PagesTyrone Power Jr.: The Miracle Man
139 Words | 1 PagesFreedom In Into The Wild
1044 Words | 5 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Into The Wild, By Jon Krakauer
629 Words | 3 PagesChris Mccandless Into The Wild Essay
664 Words | 3 Pages