ipl-logo

Analysis Of Edmund Burke's Reflections Of The Revolution In France

1515 Words7 Pages

In 1790, Irishman Edmund Burke published Reflections of the Revolution in France as a letter of stark critique against the French Revolution. A conservative, Burke’s philosophy of human nature highlighted society as prior to individuals and emphasized tradition. Within his conservative model, no one was born into a “state of nature,” for the mental experiment of a social contract was merely absurd. Instead, he viewed society as inherently organic and unlike a machine. Moreover, his major argument against the French Revolution was its foundation on abstract ideals, that although possibly desirable, could have problematic consequences of tyranny and disorder. Consequently, his work focuses on the values of tradition and gradual governmental change as an alternative to revolution. Now, while Burke makes a compelling case for tradition, I find his idea of …show more content…

He explicates that “the despotism of custom is everywhere the standing hindrance to human advancement, being in unceasing antagonism to that disposition to aim at something better than customary, which is called … the spirit of liberty, or that of progress, or improvement” (Mill 69). Here, Mill presents a contrary opinion to Burke by problematizing the overbearingness of what is customary, and positing that humans are progressive beings. Now, while Burke is not necessarily arguing against all forms of change, his framework criticizes the revolutionary manner of change in its abruptness and haste. However, in accordance with Mill, such revolutionary change is a part of the momentum of the spirit of liberty in its alteration of an oppressive system. Additionally, by destabilizing tradition, humanity appeals to its own originality and individuality by progressing to better forms of living. Thus, conformity to tradition is dangerous to the individuals within society because it stifles the growth by making us unaccustomed to conceiving

Show More
Related
1146 Words | 5 Pages

The militaristic inclination of France during the late 18th and early 19th century was the culmination of the idealism of the newly adopted French political system, and the abrupt character of French people's motivation to implement these ideals. As discontent with the despotic system of government in France increased in magnitude and scale, the will to fight in order to achieve equality became gained momentum. Factors such as the rapid spread of enlightenment ideals, the socio-economic inequity of the three estate system, and leaders’ utilization of French citizens’ new sense of justice to incite warfare, all come together to create an militaristic, imperial French nation. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, enacted July of 1789, provided the foundation

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Burke, along with the american colonies, deeply resented these actions and thus went about dismantling them. Burke thought that instead of Britain forcing taxes on the colonies the colonies ought to be able to tax themselves. Burke said in british parliament in the speech on american taxation “if she has taxable matter in her, to tax herself” (Speech On American Taxation). Burke thought this because he had seen how the coercion that these taxes sought to bring about only resulted in contempt in the eyes of the colonists.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

French Revolution was a major revolt of French citizens turning against the traditional values of the monarchy. People realized the unfairness of the state of France and demanded change causing a major disagreement between the people of France and their leaders, the clergy and the nobility. The people of France found this unfairness in multiple way those being politically, socially, and economically. They saw the power imbalance, unequal taxing, and terrible quality of life and wanted change.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

The conservative Burke who thought that human beings were not perfectible contrasted significantly with the progressive Condorcet who thought the opposite. Burke was raised in a family with a strong religious background where he and his mother were close in relationship. This led to his compassion towards the Irish Catholics who had limited human rights at that time. He advocated

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Wollstonecraft and Paine, and Burke had conflicting opinions on which was the better system of governing. Burke believes that divine rule was better because it is the only form of governing he's been under. On the other hand Paine believes the monarchy is irrational and that a republic is a new salvation, which is the idea that Wollstonecraft takes and builds upon. Burke’s argument is that monarchy is needed because man is evil and cannot

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

Edmund Burke discloses his reluctance to change in his Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents, by arguing the old form of government was better than the new one. Specifically, he argued that from the Glorious Revolution in 1688 through the reign of George II of Hanover, the leaders of the Whig party controlled the country under the reign of the king in what he called “the most fortunate periods of our history” (Burke 529). At the same time, the parlement of Paris objects to the current policies of the French government in the Remonstrance against the Edict Suppressing Obligatory Labor. By comparing the similarities and differences of thoughts between the two pieces, conservative intentions unfold in both the parlement’s and Burke’s writing. Both the parlement of Paris and Edmund Burke believe the salvation of the country lies in certain groups of people maintaining power.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

Paul Revere was not a unique hero before the Battle of Lexington In 1775, but if you read the poem you would think he was. Paul Revere's poem starts with a Man/Woman telling the famous story of Paul Revere and his friends were in Boston making a plan to warn the people of the villages that the British were coming to take and capture the people taking their freedom with them. All of this would all happen on the 18th and 19th of April Late evening and early morning. After Paul and his friend make a plan at the belfry-arch Of the North-Church-tower. If the British came by land put a lit lantern on top of the belfry tower,If the British came by sea Paul's friend would put 2 lit lanterns on the top of the church.

Read More
694 Words | 3 Pages

He writes with a formal tone in order to seem more analytical to the reader, and begins his essay with a thesis that states what it means “to be conservative”. Burke’s writing is slightly less formal, and is written in the form of a letter to the reader, making him seem more relatable. The informal tone of his essay helps create the perception that he is like the “common man”, therefore his political beliefs would be better suited for the public. Though they are from two very different time periods, both authors have very similar political beliefs and effectively express the fundamentals of conservative thinking.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

This contributes to a regulatory state and controlling authoritative figures. The end result of this is a stagnated society, which is intolerant of the free expression of one’s individuality and ultimately limits the advancement of society. Blind acceptance of traditions and strict social conformity can lead to the

Read More
1498 Words | 6 Pages

For instance, Burke denotes that taxes should be essentially proportional, while benefits should not be distributed equally, but rather should favor those who pay more: "He that has but five shillings in the partnership, has as good a right to it, as he that has five hundred pounds has to his larger proportion. But he has not a right to an equal dividend in the product of the joint stock. "(46) Moreover, Burke believes that politics cannot change anything about human nature because nothing would reasonably go against the “natural state or things”. Burke quite skeptical of grand schemes because politics themselves are just a reflection of our human nature.

Read More
1427 Words | 6 Pages

During the Eighteenth Century, France had an absolute monarchy with Louis XVI as king and Marie Antoinette as queen. In that time period, French society was based upon a system of Estates where the clergy made up the First Estate; the nobility comprised the Second Estate, and everyone else including professionals, peasants, and the bourgeoisie made up the Third Estate. The Third Estate was immensely unhappy with the old regime, the Estates General, and Louis XVI’s leadership. France was also in the midst of a fiscal crisis due to the American Revolution, Louis XVI’s lavish lifestyle, the Seven Years War, and the tax exemption of the First and Second Estate. Following the surge of new ideas and impactful philosophers from the Enlightenment,

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

Change takes places everywhere, everyday. If we as humans experience change on a daily basis, it should be no surprise that even “The Land of the Free” must eventually evolve. A Fierce Discontent by Yale alumni Indiana University historian and Michael McGerr documents this change that spread throughout America, which is known as the Progressive Movement. Michael McGerr believed that “the people and struggles of that age of “fierce discontent” a century ago still command our attention” (McGerr, xiii), which sheds a little light as to why he chose to write about the Progressive Era. It was social and political reform and activism that made up the Progressive Era and

Read More
1484 Words | 6 Pages

Progressivism was a reform movement that began during the end of the 19th century and continued through the first couple decades of the 20th century. During this time, many writers, politicians, and social welfare advocates came forward as leaders of the Progressive movement and sought to solve societal problems that were caused by capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. While these Progressives often differed in what they saw as America’s main problem and how it could be fixed, they shared the common belief that in order for the reforms to work, the government needed to take the lead, be actively involved in the reforms, and be more democratic. All citizens, similarly, were to take responsibility for their society as well. What follows is

Read More
725 Words | 3 Pages

Compare and contrast of The French Revolution and The American Revolution The American revolution and the French Revolution are two major incidents happened in the 1700s, which had intense social impacts on both French and American societies. In general, the American Revolution was more successful than the French revolution. The similarity between them is that the citizens in both countries, both faced the block of common economical development of the government. However, there is a difference that makes the American revolution succeeded while the French revolution doesn’t.

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes, two titans of the Enlightenment, work within similar intellectual frameworks in their seminal writings. Hobbes, in Leviathan, postulates a “state of nature” before society developed, using it as a tool to analyze the emergence of governing institutions. Rousseau borrows this conceit in Discourse on Inequality, tracing the development of man from a primitive state to modern society. Hobbes contends that man is equal in conflict during the state of nature and then remains equal under government due to the ruler’s monopoly on authority. Rousseau, meanwhile, believes that man is equal in harmony in the state of nature and then unequal in developed society.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Edmund Burke's Reflections Of The Revolution In France

Related Topics

Open Document