Irrational Government Surveillance In 1984 By George Orwell

681 Words3 Pages

Cooper Cammack Mr.Johnston Great Books. The practice of following people and taking pictures of them without their permission raises serious issues with personal safety and privacy. My invasive behavior is a reflection of the larger problem of irrational government surveillance, in which government agencies keep tabs on citizens without their knowledge or proper justification. Both actions violate the fundamental right to privacy, destroying faith and building an atmosphere of distrust. Evaluate the similarities between individual privacy invasions and government overreach to emphasize how crucial it is to protect freedoms in both public and private areas. Like mentioned above, following people around and taking pictures of them without their …show more content…

In both instances, the government monitored citizens' communications and actions without their knowledge or approval by using cutting-edge technology. Snowden's revelations exposed the extent to which intelligence agencies like the National Security Agency (NSA) were intercepting and gathering enormous amounts of data from phone calls, emails, and internet browsing habits, much like in the book, where telescreens and covert microphones are everywhere. Widespread worries about the loss of private rights and possible government agency power abuse were sparked by the discovery. Comparably, the people of Oceania in "1984" never stopped worrying about the Thought Police because they never knew when they would be observed or listened to. Similarly, people in today's world are becoming more conscious of the possibility that their online behavior is being watched, which causes them to self-censor and limit free speech. These incidents highlight the risks associated with unrestricted government surveillance, as well as the significance of preserving basic rights in this age of technological innovation. In conclusion, George Orwell's "1984" and current real-world examples highlight the similarities between government surveillance of individuals