ipl-logo

Is Euthanasia Morally Wrong

1266 Words6 Pages

Is actively assisting in euthanasia morally wrong? There is a huge moral debate revolving around the concept of euthanasia, which is the painless killing of a patient suffering a terminal illness or injury, and the morality in each aspect of this medical phenomenon. For the purpose of this paper I will be focusing on the morality of doctors actively assisting in the euthanasia of their patients. This would mean the doctor either prescribes an overdose of a certain kind of medication or administers a lethal amount of a drug to the patient that will painlessly kill them. On the basis that the patient is in excruciating unstoppable pain in which they will never recover from for majority of their time and they themselves ask for this procedure …show more content…

Positive aspects of morally allowing the active assistance allows the patient to relieve their pain early enough that they are not suffering unnecessarily, the patient is able to go when they feel they have had sufficient closure, and it can help aid their family in transitioning to a life without them by providing a set day to receive closure. Negative affect by allowing for assisted euthanasia could be that the patient misses out on the pleasures of life that may happen if they were to still be alive, the patient may make the call too earlier because of an increase of pain at the time, and the family may suffer a greater loss due to the fact the patient chose to die and not allowing for it to naturally occur. Some of …show more content…

They can point to the fact that if the patient was not in pain then they would want to stay alive as long as possible even though they are terminally ill therefore we ought to morally reject doctors participating in euthanasia since the patient's judgment is clouded by the pain they are in. We can not ignore the fact that pain can cause patients to be more desperate to end their situation and if their pain were to subside they may not want to end their life so early. Though we can acknowledge that “fully reliable pain control is a myth” (Battin 1987, 63) meaning for most patients there is no way to thier relieve pain enough where their judgment is no longer clouded. As discussed previously it is the doctor's least disputed moral obligation is to provide pain relief and if there is no reliable pain control method and restrictions are put on what they can offer their patients then how do we expect them to uphold this obligation to every patient they come across in their career. Based off of the fact no universal and reliable pain control method exists, and that doctors have a moral obligation to provide pain relief to patients, then we ought to morally accept doctors actively participating in euthanasia as a way to provide a guaranteed pain relief to their

Show More
Related
156 Words | 1 Pages

Conclusion I have argued that even though a physician killing an untreatable patient and a physician letting a patient die upon their request are both morally justifiable, the distinction between the two regarding the morality of physician assisted suicide is important because they are both justified differently. I have presented two counter arguments based on consequentialism, and argued that both of them untrue. A physician killing an untreatable patient upon their request and letting an untreatable patient die upon their request are both justifiable aspects of physician assisted suicide, and therefore it is not an important distinction to make regarding the moral permissibility of physician assisted suicide. However, it is an important

Read More
1246 Words | 5 Pages

Commentary On A Medical Dilemma Physician-assisted suicide is a large moral controversy in the medical field. Jukka Varelius explains the key points about the dilemma on whether medical patients should have the right to ask doctors to terminate their lives, in order to end their suffering. In “Voluntary Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and the Right to do Wrong”, the author addresses how assisting suicide is morally wrong in our society, but yet patients insist that they have the moral right to end their lives if they are in agony and facing significant torment due to their ill status. Jukka, in his point of view, outlines the multiple problems that go along with the main conflict, such as should a doctor be forced to end a suffering patient’s life even if the physician does not wish to do so and should the patient have the ability to ask for euthanasia even if there is still a possibility that the patient’s status can improve. Mr. Varelius does a successful job portraying the key points in this conflict, but does not strongly support any side in the

Read More
1861 Words | 8 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide, or euthanasia, is defined as “the act or practice of causing or permitting the death of hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy.” The controversy over euthanasia pits courts, medical professionals, and the ill against questions of reason, laws, and

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Physician-assisted Suicide and Ethical Principles The responsibility a physician has to his patients and society is established by medical ethics and is at a greater degree than the law (Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017). The ethical principles, beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and promotion of fairness and social justice, are the basis for a physician’s duties to his patients. He is a member of a profession with ethical obligations; he is not just a service provider, but a moral advocate. Both medical ethics and the law support the patient’s right to refuse therapy.

Read More
629 Words | 3 Pages

Japan Rising explains how the economic status of citizens was in World War II. Due to a post-war constitution, the military during the time period encountered an epidemic that was detrimental to the military. During this time frame, other people would view Japan as a tradition-bound country because of their customs or beliefs they had. But as Kenneth Pyle pointed out, looks can be deceiving when you see it for yourself in person. Kenneth Pyle has done the unobtainable.

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted Suicide Persuasive Essay Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia is defined as “suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient's intent” (“physician–assisted suicide”). Most of the patients who request physician assisted suicide have life threatening illnesses and want to end their suffering. There has been a debate, mainly for the past two decades, about whether or not it’s ethical for physicians to legally be able to cause someone to die even if the patient is requesting it. Even though according to Northwestern University “Physician-Assisted Suicide is not a new phenomenon. Suffering has always been a part

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Most people might consider this as a murder; however, there are indeed some physicians think this is humanistic and based on the statistic results, about 18 percent of the physicians would use prescribing medication or other forms to hasten patients’ life (Meier et al., 1998). In my point of view, it should be allowed the physician-assisted suicide because of the right of patients, the duty of physicians and the rationality of patients with the benefits it brings. I will discuss these three reasons in detail in the following content.

Read More
1289 Words | 6 Pages

The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide is equal parts emotional and debatable. People fight over whether it is ethically acceptable for a dying person who has chosen to avoid the unimaginable suffering at the end of their precious life. Additionally, it is also the physician’s duty to ease the patient 's suffering, which may justify providing aid-in-dying depending on the case. This becomes a huge issue not on ethically but politically for the doctors because studies have shown that the doctors are often divided on if they feel that physician assisted suicide should be legalized. If it does in fact become legalized it will force hundreds of thousands of doctors to help kill someone when they take the hippocratic oath to help someone

Read More
1550 Words | 7 Pages

Physician-assisted suicide is a very controversial topic in today’s society. Physician-assisted suicide is defined as an action performed by the physician at the request of the patient to end the patient’s life with certain medical procedures. The legalization of physician-assisted suicide should not be passed in the United States because it is not morally acceptable in the society, leads to misunderstanding of a physician’s duty and increases mental suffering of both patient’s family and doctor. Physician-assisted suicide should not be legalized since the action itself is not justified morally. It is never morally acceptable for the society to give up on its people’s lives.

Read More
647 Words | 3 Pages

The legalization of physician assisted suicide is a very polarizing topic with many advocates for each opposing position. Despite the position that physician assisted suicide should be illegal there are still many valid arguments for its legalization. One of the more popular arguments in favor physician assisted suicide is that it ends the suffering of patients who are experiencing intolerable pain. Most jurisdictions in which, have legalized physician assisted suicide to terminally ill patients, have done so on the belief that it presents a more “merciful death”. As physician assisted suicide does bring a more painless alternative most patients do not request the practice for the purposes of pain.

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

The use of euthanasia allows patients to end their lives fully aware of life, as opposed to under the influence of heavy medication. From the first hand experience of a cancer patient, “Surely this decision should be made individually by each of us, and we ought to be free to make it in accordance with our own values” (Gubar 10). No one can make a decision for a patient except themselves. The level of pain can only be felt by the patient, and therefore the decision whether to die slowly and always in pain or to die when they are ready can ultimately only be made by

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

By allowing doctors to be part of euthanasia signifies a rejection of the importance and value of human life. Supporters of euthanasia claim that it is already determined permissible to take human life under certain circumstances such as self-defense - but they miss the point that when someone kills in self-defense they are saving the life of an innocent person - either their own or someone else's. When euthanasia is performed there is no one being saved – there is only life that is being taken. Many who believe in euthanasia say that it is a means to avoid pain and suffering, but we have to remind

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

It is of no opposition that doctors are life savers. Physicians do all that they can to ensure that the patient they are caring for is being treated to prolong their life and well being. With that being said, what if the doctor takes the necessary steps in doing the complete opposite? At first, this idea seems hardly permissible. Yet some might say in a situation where the patient's death is inevitable, why draw out their pain and suffering?

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

A controversial practice that invokes a debate over how beneficial its intentions are is the use of euthanasia. The argument switches between whether or not putting terminally ill patients to death with the assistance of a physician is justifiable and right. Legalizing the practice of euthanasia is a significant topic among many people in society, including doctors and nurses in the medical field, as it forces people to decide where to draw the line between relieving pain and simply killing. While some people see euthanasia as a way to helping a patient by eliminating their pain, it is completely rejected by others who see it as a method of killing.

Read More

More about Is Euthanasia Morally Wrong

Related Topics

Open Document