Yes, I know if Hamlet had survived, he would have been a good king because A king is a male head of state who typically ascends to power and maintains it for life until death ,in the story of Hamlet, he was loved by everyone who had the chance to know him, he was young, and he was a thinker, which would have helped him be a great king. Hamlet was also educated, and education is key. Hamlet was also compassionate and not selfish because he never forced himself to become king. If Hamlet had survived his fate, he would be a greater king than Claudius or any king that has ever had the power to be a king in Hamlet. Hamlet was loved by everyone because he was loyal, young, and caring. If Hamlet had survived his fate, he would be a greater king than …show more content…
Ophelia and the other characters in the book did not receive such treatment, but Hamlet did because practically everyone cared about him. That is what made Hamlet considered to be a soldier at his barrel. That decision was made by the new king named Fortinbras in Act 5 scene 2. Fortinbras says, "Let four captains bear Hamlet like a soldier," which Hamlet was given the fact he followed through on his plan of killing Cludia's to get revenge for his father. Hamlet never fought to become king because he never had the thought that he should be king, making him not selfish, whereas Claudius did the devil's work to become …show more content…
That would make sense, something that King Claudius was unable to accomplish because he was uneducated. Given the fact in Act 5 Scene 2, Hamlet switched the letter that King Claudius had written to the king of England to kill Hamlet on his way to England. Then Hamlet switched the letter and wrote that the king of England should kill the people who brought it. This fast thinking and education helped Hamlet save his life. Educated individuals tend to stay away from wars and conflicts in favor of seeking out more collaborative solutions to issues that include