ipl-logo

Is Reproductive Technology Harmful To Children

435 Words2 Pages

Is reproductive technology harmful to children? While advancements in any technology are usually celebrated, there are some who claim that conceiving a child by sperm or egg donor is morally unacceptable. There are always a few who oppose reproductive technology based because they believe children have the right to be raised by both biological parents, but it is unreasonable to say that this type of advancement is damaging to any child born. Donor-conceived children not being raised by both biological parents not immoral, and the growth of reproductive technologies should be encouraged. In Elizabeth Marquardt’s article “Some Reproductive Technologies Should accusation,” she argues that use of anonymous sperm and egg donations should be halted due to the fact that the children conceived do not have access to both biological parents, which causes them to be "deprived of their full identities." According to Marquardt being raised and knowing our parents is our birthright and donor conception is infringes on that child's birthright. But is allowing a child to be born to only one biological parent really as unethical as she makes it sound? The answer is no. It is outrageous to say that we should not allow reproductive donations from people who don't want to be involved in the conceived child's life. The …show more content…

She says, "In law and culture, the two-natural-parent, mother-father model is falling away, replaced with the idea that children are fine with any one or more adults being called their parents, so long as the appointed parents are nice people." Since when has parenthood been based on niceness? And how do the roles of two "natural parents" differ from the roles of adoptive parents? Marquardt argument boils down to your definition of a parent, are your parents the people who raised and cared for you, or are they the people whom you share your DNA

Show More
Related
978 Words | 4 Pages

The theory of the case revolved around the incompetence of Bertha and how Abigail would be a better caretaker. This is relevant, but the focus should have been more around the RWS and BCF vs EAG case, held by Minnesota Supreme Court in 2009. The factors of intent involved in this case mirrored those of Abigail v. Bertha, which incorporates the contract stating the intended parents in a traditional surrogacy. In both cases, the intended parent is stated, and in RWS and BCF v. EAG, the gay couple won. The only difference is that the gay couple were ruled the biological parents because one of the men donated his sperm, whereas Abigail did not have a biological relationship with the twin boys.

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

The

Read More
300 Words | 2 Pages

The

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

The

Read More
1635 Words | 7 Pages

The Non Identity Headache Ethics and morality are the backbone of our society, taking different forms, whether it be religion, science, or other personal beliefs, it lays down a golden rule of what is and what isn’t acceptable. However, morality becomes difficult to apply to controversial topics, especially those such as pre-birth human enhancement and human reproductive cloning due to the fact that it applies to other humans. One of the most important topics that arise from discussing these issues is the Non Identity Problem. In order to try and provide reasoning for both pre-birth enhancement and human reproductive cloning, I will first explain what the Non Identity Issue is and its relation to genetics, then explain how it may affect one’s

Read More
976 Words | 4 Pages

Have you ever noticed that a common theme in movies are usually conservative? A recurring trend that is seen in films are either patriarchal family, use of firearms, and sometimes the viewers are strangled into witnessing christians practicing their faith. A good example of a movie that has all three of these aspects is the new critically acclaimed movie A Quiet Place. This movie has a 95% freshness rating on Rotten Tomatoes, which is too much praise for a movie that is so oblivious to the problems the real world is facing (Rotten Tomatoes). John Krasinski (who was the director) claims he is liberal in his political standpoint, but it’s hard to tell when his movie is littered with conservative values.

Read More
1707 Words | 7 Pages

The

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

The

Read More
1192 Words | 5 Pages

As someone who believes in the good that science brings, I feel that risk designer babies bring outweigh the benefits. It will cause a divide in our society where “traditional” children will be consistently compared to genetically modified children, and it may force people to choose to Personally, I would not be comfort with participating in any assisted reproduction processes. The creation of life is sacred and should be respected and performed in the way God

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

The

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

As technology advances, more things become possible. One of these things is genetically modifying a baby, this is very wrong. Genetic modifying or genetic engineering is altering someone or something’s DNA. Scientists hope to cure diseases with this method but doing this can lead to some harmful effects. This process is very unethical.

Read More
1247 Words | 5 Pages

This procedure’s purpose is to switch out genes for more preferred ones, especially to improve the health of the child. Genetic engineering could permit selection of desired physical and pleasurable traits for non-medical reasons, which has created concern in some people. The process of switching out the genes of a fetus to install genes that are more preferred has brought up debate about whether or not parents should be able to alter their babies genes to make them more appealing to the parents interests. There are many different ways of looking at this procedure and in contrast to other scientific procedures it can be for greater good or for unnecessary enhancement that could potentially create problems in society. Designer babies aren’t morally correct or incorrect, but are in between depending on what it is being used for.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

While some people belief that by using IVF the people are destroying the natural cycle of life. They belief that a baby should be born through a natural process and that by using IVF the people are “playing God”. They also argue that IVF “dehumanize women and reduce them to empty vessels waiting to be filled with babies for the benefit of men” (Farris Naff 19). They believe that women go through the process of IVF because they want to satisfy their partner instead of themselves. Even though, IVF can be convenient for women, it is known that IVF can have some bad outcomes to some.

Read More
1614 Words | 7 Pages

Many questions arise when discussing such controversial issues (Jaenisch et al.). Some of these questions include "the central, apparently unresolvable issue of the moral status of the human embryo, which raises questions about which perspectives should govern appropriate pluralistic policy" (Jaenisch et al.). There are also questions as to how to weigh the "possible scientific breakthroughs" with the "less quantifiable values and perspectives" (Jaenisch et al.). While there are decent arguments on how the copying of a human being could be

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

Single parent adoption In today's society, one of the strongest controversy in the world today is over whether or not single parents should be allowed to adopt. Some believe it is socially acceptable for a single parent to adopt a child and that “single prospective adopters of both genders can have much to offer to an adopted child” (The Telegraph Tim Ross), others think that singles should not be able to adopt. In some eyes they see that a child needs two parents so a child can grow up having a mother and father figure to look up to, and by having two parents, one can fill in the other part when one is sick or tired or so on.

Read More

More about Is Reproductive Technology Harmful To Children

Related Topics

Open Document