Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is space exploration worth cost
Is space exploration worth cost
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is space exploration worth cost
Is space exploration worth cost
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The 35th president of the United States, John F Kennedy, gave his “Race to Space” speech at Rice University In Houston, Texas under great pressure to “catch up” to the Soviets and their space program. He delivered this speech to challenge America to take a leading position in the Space Race and to encourage them in their studies to make it possible. To start, President Kennedy’s “Race to Space” speech calls upon the country to preempt the exploration of space using pathos, irony, and metaphor. Kennedy uses pathos throughout his speech but most notably when he states, “than those of the Soviet Union”. At the time this speech was given, the United States and the Soviet Union had extreme tension coming out of the cold war and entering the space
Americans had high expectations of the space programs which intended to provide the United States a great sense of achievement. The significance of the space program lies in which symbolized American glory in science and technology. To pay tribute to the men and women who lost their lives. He explains that they will keep trying to send astronauts into space. Ethos - To quote Sr.
Reagan brings up the death of explorer Sir Francis Drake on the same day as the astronauts, and compares how if Drake died exploring a great frontier, so will the seven passengers on board Challenger. Stating how history will honor those who died on the mission appeals to the American audience. Despite the depression of failure, Reagan reminds America how failure does not diminish the space program, but how America will continue to follow the pioneers who led a nation. By remembering the “courage it took for the crew of the shuttle” and using the failure to inspire a continued effort to explore space, Reagan turns the tragedy into motivation and respect for explorers who confront
In order to accomplish his purpose, the writer of this speech used diction and tone to show sorrow for the families of the men and women whose lives were lost on the Columbia and organized the speech by talking about how the lives lost will not affect moving forward in space advances. The writer expresses his grief for the family by using “great sadness” and naming the seven astronauts who died on this mission. While setting a tone of grief for these astronauts families, George W. Bush also organizes the speech by talking about how the men and women knew the risks of their travel. He first explains his feelings of loss and mourning for the men and women who lost their lives, but also says that this tragedy will not be a setback for space travel.
Later in his speech, Reagan addresses future plans of the space program, and expresses that although the events that had occurred were tragic, it would not be a setback in vain. “We'll continue our quest in space. There will be more shuttle flights and more shuttle crews and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, more teachers in space. Nothing ends here; our hopes and our journeys continue” (Reagan). In saying this, Reagan is informing his audience that the space program would continue to operate and push the boundaries of technology.
When people take risks, they put their lives in danger for the greater good of other people. In the text, “Address to the Nation on the Explosion of the Space Shuttle Challenger,” by President Reagan, the Challenger Seven astronauts take the risk of going into space. As President Reagan explains the tragic incident to the nation, he states, “astronauts.aware of the danger”(2). The astronauts went up to space knowing that it was dangerous that they could die and that people had died before. Even though the astronauts did die, the consequence of this risk also has a positive outcome.
In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the
The oration was momentary; it only lasted for a little more than four minutes and added up to just 650 words in total. Nevertheless, it was concise and efficient in serving its purpose. Through the brief speech, Reagan not only alleviated the despair suffered by the different groups of audience, but also retained the nation’s spirit in space exploration: “We mourn their loss as a nation together…I’ve always had great faith in and respect for our space program, and what happened today does nothing to diminish it.” As the top leader of the country, Mr. Reagan demonstrated his support for more research and discovery, and were trying to convince the rest of the American population to do the same.
This is significant because it shows how exploration has developed the world’s medicine over the decades. Readers should not only agree with Kennedy because medical research can improve lives, but also because exploration could advance the world’s technology. Another reason to support Kennedy’s claim is that technological upgrades could lead the nation to a more advanced future. As additional text from Kennedy’s speech states, “And second, medical space research may revolutionize the technology and the techniques of modern medicine. New devices are being created, for example, to monitor our astronauts, to measure their heart activity, their breathing, their brain waves.
On January 28, 1986, President Ronald Reagan responded to the dreadful crash of the space shuttle, Challenger, with words of sorrow about the loss of seven men and women. The situation at hand called for a sincere message from the leader of the country by giving his respect and thank those who died on that unfortunate day. Ronald Reagan made the dreadful event into a speech that motivated the American citizens to keep being brave and exploring whether it is in regard to the NASA space program or just the ambition of achieving the freedom that America stands for. Knowing that the direct audience would be the citizens of the United States and the indirect audience would be other countries like Russia who were competing for the exploration of space, Reagan knew he had to pressure the citizens to not give up and not become scared because this one incident. The speech emphasizes this point through Reagan’s directly mention of “the schoolchildren of America.”
The idea of space and the exploration of it is still a fairly new topic to most people. Even today, there are still conspiracies on whether or not the moon landing is even real. But before any of these conspiracies could even start, America’s exploration of space needed to be pioneered by John F. Kennedy. In his speech on September 12, 1961, delivered at Rice University, Kennedy appeals to both Americans’ emotion and trust in order to convey his message that space exploration is worthy for Americans to invest their time. Kennedy tried to build trust and credibility with the audience by acknowledging that space exploration will not be easy.
This coerces the audience to want to support the space efforts if it means that America will have even more high quality satellites, and if it means beating the Soviet Union at something. This data also shows objectivity, which provides the audience with the truth, and provides the space program with a credible background which underscores the importance of it. Later in the speech John uses more data to prove his point: “To be sure, all this costs us all a good deal of money. This year's space budget is three times what it was in January 1961, and it is greater than the space budget of the previous 8 years combined. That budget now stands at $5,400 million a year-a staggering sum, though somewhat less than we
This use of pathos reinforces the idea that space exploration represents a grand adventure and an opportunity for discovery, tapping into the audience's sense of wonder and curiosity. Finally, JFK appeals to their concern for the future of humanity, stating, "For the eyes of the world now look into space, to the moon and to the planets beyond, and we have vowed that we shall not see it governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of freedom and peace." (Kennedy, 1962).
From the Jim Crow era to the civil rights movement, progress toward racial equality in the US was hard-won but ultimately achieved. Jim Crow laws enforced racial segregation in public facilities, requiring separate and unequal facilities for Americans and whites. The Jim Crow system believed that whites were superior to black, leading to the denial of education and economic opportunities to African American. Blacks had to use courtesy titles when referring to whites, while whites were not expected to use these titles when addressing African American. The Jim Crow era and the civil rights movement in the US were significant periods characterized by racial segregation and discrimination, the eventual dismantling of legal segregation, and progress
Should we spend taxpayer money to invest in the space program? The space program is a program to pioneer the future in space exploration. The program has consumed about 18.4 billion dollars on trying to explore the barren and empty place they call space. This money that 's used on this space exploration comes from our taxpayers.