Isabel Edwards 'Selling Of Fake Doctors' Notes

Question 1 1.1 Parties Impacted by the Selling of Fake Doctors’ Notes: • University Students: The primary recipients of the fake doctors’ notes who may benefit from using them to excuse themselves from academic responsibilities. Good Heart Hospital: The reputation and integrity of the hospital may be compromised due to its association with fraudulent activities. Genuine Medical Professionals: The credibility of legitimate doctors and medical professionals may be undermined if fake notes are being circulated. Academic Institutions: The academic integrity of universities may be compromised if students resort to dishonest means to avoid their academic duties. Society at Large: The overall trust in medical institutions and ethical standards could

Engaging in deceitful practices that undermine the trust in medical documentation and compromise academic integrity goes against ethical principles and professional conduct. Therefore, Isabel Edwards’ actions cannot be justified as ethical, based solely on the advantage received by a specific party. 1.3 Ethical considerations in ethics emphasize the interconnectedness of individuals and their actions. They should consider not only one's interests, but also the impact on others. Evaluating ethical situations requires assessing both personal values and the impact on others. Ignoring either perspective can lead to biased judgments and unethical behavior. Ethical decisions should promote fairness, respect, and integrity in human interactions. 1.4 The 'good' component of the ethics triangle is crucial in determining an action's ethicality. It encompasses values like honesty, fairness, compassion, and respect. The 'good' component evaluates whether an action aligns with moral standards and societal norms. Positive outcomes, justice, beneficence, and welfare are more likely to be considered

Question 3: Integrity is a crucial aspect of ethical behavior, encompassing honesty, trustworthiness, and moral adherence. Isabel Edwards' deceptive practices, such as selling fake doctors' notes, contradict the principles of integrity. Integrity requires consistency between words and actions with moral values and societal norms. Edwards' unethical conduct for personal gain demonstrates a disregard for moral principles and casts doubt on her commitment to integrity. The case study's information reveals that Edwards does not exhibit characteristics indicative of integrity, as her involvement in selling fake notes undermines trust, honesty, and ethical values essential for true integrity. Therefore, she cannot be considered a person of integrity. Question 4 The actions of reception desk clerks who assist Dr. Isabel Edwards in selling fake doctors' notes at Good Heart Hospital can have significant implications for organizational ethics. The compromise of organizational integrity is evident, as it undermines the hospital's commitment to ethical practices and erodes trust among patients, staff, and