To begin with Bernard Schwartz’s commentary on the constitution of the United States: The Powers of the Government discuss how there has said to be a misapplication in the implementation of Martial law. The exertion of martial law in some cases has been recognized as governmental injustice which is brought upon citizens and noncitizens in the United States. That is to say corruption of this deposition has placed questions on whether or not its means serves a rightful purpose. There were misuses of the doctrine of martial law by state governors.2
As an illustration “1892 Coeur Idaho where four rebellious mine workers blew up a mill and one person died, the governor declared martial law and over six hundred people was arrested.” (Constitutional
…show more content…
But within the context of Jacqueline Klosek’s The War on Privacy she describes, the USA Patriot Act, as it condemns an individual of those rights to be justified and knowledgeable of the forthcoming search. With that being said authorities conduct unreasonable searches. It is an indefensible act that rejects citizens of their rights of privacy. Accordingly, authorities have the right to harass a person at any time under their own discretion. And as a result individuals may be subject to an arrest. The patriot act provided authorities with the ability to delay the notice of a search …show more content…
The legal exemption trait was condemned as disposing persons to be recompensed for illegal captivity. Protection element was criticize for withholding individuals the chance of indemnity for illegitimate apprehension and false imprisonment. To put in other words the privilege characteristic was proscribed as docking civilians of restitution for outlawed arrest and confinement. Thus, the impunity attribute factor stripped citizens of justice for their grievance involving unlawful arrest and detainment. The immunity feature was denounced as depriving the citizens of all redress for illegal arrest and