ipl-logo

James Hardie Banton Asbestos Case

1061 Words5 Pages

Asbestos, according to Betterhealth.vic.gov.au, is a naturally occurring heart and flame resistant. Having contact with this chemical can lead to a variety of illnesses, including asbestosis, lung cancer and a cancer called mesothelioma. Bernie Baton, who was a lathe operator at James Hardie Co & Pty Ltd, which is an industrial building materials company, was working with this chemical from 1968 to 1974 without his awareness. Eventually, Bernie Banton was diagnosed with asbestosis in 1999. James Hardie was fully aware of the dangers asbestosis can cause, but ignored the facts and didn’t do anything about it; rather he continued to use it in his products and didn’t inform any employees of asbestosis’ risks. James Hardie’s negligence led to Bernie …show more content…

Under the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, it states “The employer must ensure the health, safety and welfare of their employees when at work by: ensuring that any places that are controlled by the employer are safe and without risks to health…., ensuring the safe and proper use, handling, storage and transport of plants and substances provided for use by employees”, and there was many more dot points listed. James Hardie breached the duty of care in which he owed to his employees, including Bernie Banton. James Hardie could have informed his workers that they were handling asbestos, and he could have provided them with personal protective equipment to prevent the employees from inhaling asbestos. Bernie Banton had the right to be protected and had the right to have been advised that he was working with asbestos. His rights were infringed, and so were all of James Hardie’s employees, when James Hardie decided to keep the risks of asbestos confidential. If these laws weren’t around at the time that Banton was working, he would not have been able to take the case to court, because James Hardie wouldn’t have had a duty to protect his employees. But, these laws were around, so this meant that Banton could take the case to court, in which he did. Not only did these laws encourage Banton to go to court, but so did the fact that now he, and many other James Hardie employees, had to live with …show more content…

Individuals who were working in the asbestos mine didn’t like that Banton was taking this to court as they could have lost their jobs if Banton’s case was successful, and the asbestos mine shut down. Whereas many individuals who were on Banton’s side and who were affected by James Hardie believed that all people who have been injured because of someone’s carelessness, should be rewarded with compensation from the negligent person. And those people also believed that making a company liable also helps to guarantee that they are more careful in their actions that could possibly hurt another person. After Banton was diagnosed in 1999 for asbestosis, he instantly knew that this disease was linked to when he was working as a lathe operator at James Hardie. Banton sued James Hardie, and received 800,000 dollars in compensation in an out-of-court settlement, which was taken place the morning before Banton’s trial. This settlement helped bring notice to the many other claims that were being taken against James Hardie. Banton didn’t stop there. He kept campaigning against James Hardie, bringing attention to asbestos-related diseases. As time went on, Banton found out more about what happened to his fellow workers, which only angered him even more, and pushed him to become an impassioned individual who was the voice

Show More
Related
384 Words | 2 Pages

Matheson Trucking, Inc. vs. Matheson Flight Extenders warehouse workers The discrimination case that I am discussing is the recent victory of five former and two current warehouse workers of Denver Colorado’s Matheson Flight Extenders, a branch of the Sacramento, California based-Matheson Trucking Company. This suit, stemming from incidents beginning in 2010, involved managers committing the atrocity of race discrimination, defamation of character, and demoralization. My thoughts are intense anger at the treatment of these workers. What training or ethics class, or intro to being a decent human being did these managers miss?

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

Even though working conditions are the responsibility of the employer, it is the job of the employee to practice and implement safe working practices. In order to determine if the company is responsible, a complete report including the employee’s actions should be considered. The incident could just be an outcome of employees not practicing safe working procedures. Whether the penalties are sufficient, that would depend on the outcome of a complete investigation of the

Read More
274 Words | 2 Pages

In fact, it wasn’t unusual for severe accidents or injuries to occur while on the job. After a long day of work, Carnegie’s employees came home to rough living areas. With the air polluted, structures grimy and beginning to fall apart, roads

Read More
546 Words | 3 Pages

Due to the changing of society, it forced the switch from ideological thinking to progressive thinking to carry out an emphasis on society as a whole and on social groups. During the progressive movement, specific events like the New York Workers Compensation Act of 1910 influenced this change. Following that, the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire raised awareness not only for gender discrimination, but also workplace conditions. Ives v. South Buffalo Railway Company addressed the situation between workers compensation and the dangers of the workplace concluding that workers should have some type of liability from the company to ensure safety which ultimately, was the whole purpose of the progressive era. Progressive thinking lead to a reform in work places, social groups, and government officials.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

He was a young, adventurous man who was unable to feel empathy toward others. He was recklessly driving on the road when he accidentally ran over two kids John and Lucy Combes who were playing on the street at the time. In the 1930s there was little regulation on speeding, so in this case he got his license suspended and a fine. This is what the court decided worthy of punishment. “large group of people who had committed similar offenses.

Read More
1883 Words | 8 Pages

It all occurred on the 3rd of December back in 1984 in Bhopal, India. Due to zero of six safety systems being functional in Union Carbides ethylene producing factory more than 27 tons of methyl isocyanate and other extremely harmful gases were released into the atmosphere of Bhopal. The Union Carbide factories own documents prove that the company had taken shortcuts on safety and maintenance in order to save money and also used unproven technology in the design of the plant. It is beyond me how this is allowed to happen with a plant that produces such dangerous chemicals and has the power to do such serious and widespread damage. In the early hours of the 3rd of December residents of Bhopal awoke to fits of coughing as there lungs began to fill with fluid, which lead to cardiac and respiratory arrest.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

However, in order to bring a conviction under the Health and Safety Work Act 1974 (HSWA 1974, hereafter) against a company, the prosecution needs to prove that they created the risk, not that the risk resulted in death. According to ss.2 and ss.3, the company has to ensure “so far as is reasonably practicable” the health and safety of its employers and employees. A court can issue unlimited fine which is set out in Crown Court Guidance. S.37 of the HSWA 1974 states an individual director can be prosecuted but cannot be sent to

Read More
553 Words | 3 Pages

The author asks "Tom, did you violate Mayella Ewell? on page ___. I didn't do such. This demonstrates how Maycomb was a racist haven. Meaning that Tom lost even though his argument had enough evidence to support it.

Read More
1460 Words | 6 Pages

In this paper I will expand on an aspect of Gerald Dworkin’s critique of Joel Feinberg’s argument against legal moralism. Through Dworkin’s counterexample of informational blackmail, I maintain that Feinberg’s notion of “free-floating evils” is wrong and oversimplifies the complexity of the relationship of the law and morality. Before I proceed, some relevant background knowledge is necessary. In his argument, “Devlin Was Right: Law and the Enforcement of Morality,” Dworkin sums up Feinberg’s argument in “The Nature and Value of Rights” as: “Given the importance of personal liberty, if we are unable to justify a restriction of liberty by pointing to someone who can complain, we cannot restrict liberty.”

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

Erin abided the investigation, she expatiated the residence of Hinkley and found out that they were all suffering from illness that caused by Hexavalent Chromium. The Jensen’s manifestly filed a major lawsuit to PG&E, but the evidence Erin gathered were only bond to the PG&E Hinkley plants not with the main PG&E at Chicago. Ed realizing that this case was a tough one and they needed evidence to relate the PG&E main to the case, he almost reneged to continue. Yet he decided to set disposition by binding arbitration, but all of the complainant must agree with the proposition.

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

• Tiles and slates (made from fully compressed flat sheet): Cladding, decking and promenade tiles and roofing. • Pre-formed moulded products: Cistern and tanks, mains water pipes, sewer pipes, rainwater goods, flue pipes, fencing, roofing components, cable troughs and conduits, ventilators and ducts, and window boxes. 4.1.3. Health effect Exposure may occur when the asbestos-containing material are damaged and its particles and fibers go into the air. The exposure to asbestos increases your chances of developing lung disease.

Read More
1007 Words | 5 Pages

In the 1970's, following the discoveries of the health dangers of asbestos dust inhalation, the U.S Consumer Product Safety

Read More
1963 Words | 8 Pages

Tice, 33 Cal. 2d 80, 199 P.2d 1 (1948) FACTS: Plaintiff Summers's action was against defendants Tice and Simonson for an injury to his eye and face as the result of being struck by shotgun discharge on November 20, 1945 while plaintiff and the two defendants were hunting quail. At bench trial, the court found that as a direct result of the shooting by defendants, the shots struck plaintiff and that defendants were negligent. The plaintiff was not contributorily negligent. The defendants argued that they were not joint tortfeasors, and thus not jointly and severally liable, as they were not acting in concert, and that there was not sufficient evidence indicating which defendant was responsible for the the injuries.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

The present paper reviews the foundations of the unilateral accident model under a universe of uncertainty where agents are sensitive to “ambiguity”. Initiated by Ronald Coase (1960) and developed by Calabresi (1970), Brown (1973) and especially Shavell (1980), (1982), (1987b), the standard unilateral accident model constitutes the backbone of the economic analysis of tort law. Initially, created by lawyers and judges, tort law legally forces the wrongdoers to compensate their victims’ losses. Law and Economics stream showed that, beyond compensation, the prospect of paying heavy repairs to victims motivates potential tortfeasors to provide the highest prevention level against risk. Hence, the model is simple: a potential wrongdoer performs

Read More

More about James Hardie Banton Asbestos Case

Related Topics

Open Document