All of these people have unequaled accomplishments that qualify them for the positions. Jane Addams was a tenacious women with abilities to sway people to conform and come to unity as a whole for a better purpose. She carried her ideals and actions with firm intentions only to greater others that needed help. She has the experience to help us prevail into an overall better world and she would not mind continuing to fight afterwards to keep it that way. “A man who dies rich dies disgraced” (“PBS”). That quote that was said by a man who pioneered for advancement and persevered as the best. Andrew Carnegie had ways with business that would certainly benefit the world of today financially. Not only could he possibly revert us from our relative …show more content…
This would hold him to accepting and even fighting for ideals he’s particularly not fond with. Samuel Gompers would arise and certainly commemorate this position. Jobs would be more secure and perhaps poverty would reduce as a result. Gompers would always reconcile with businesses to possibly increase job openings, with his influence on the Commission jobs would be more regulated for less overworking and abuse within the workforce. He has an abundance of experience as the others that can certainly assist the world. With Hoover being brought into the UNWC he would envision better regulations for food. Even if enough food is being produced for everyone in today’s life, there are still ones who don’t receive any. Herbert Hoover has a vast quantity of experience with having everyone fed even when there was limited supplies, this is why I believe he could feed many of today’s world who don’t have food. Even in war situations Hoover would benefit with rationing if needed. There is much to be said about Martin Luther King Jr. such as how he had strong influences on moving people and getting rights to be