ipl-logo

Jane Doe Case Summary

728 Words3 Pages

In the case Jane Doe v. Uber a rape victim sues Uber for wrongly obtaining her medical records. Doe is suing Uber Technologies Inc. and three current and former executives. She’s currently claiming they breached her privacy by obtaining and publicizing her medical records. The plaintiff Jane Doe of Texas sued Uber after new information came up. Eric Alexander along with the CEO Travis Kalanick, and former senior vice president Emil Michael are the defendants in the litigation. This case is a false light tort, which is “a privacy tort that involves making a person seem in the public eye to be someone he or she is not. Several states do not allow false light suits”(Trager, et al. p. 260). Also “Courts in a few states disagree and allow …show more content…

Alexander publicized very intimate facts about the woman. Mr. Alexander invaded her privacy by obtaining and distributing her medical records. He believed she conspired with a competitor to to make up the story of her rape. These statements were wrong and are defamatory. In retrospect she should be compensated for the damages done. Douglas Wigdor the plaintiffs lawyer said, “Rape denial is just another form of the toxic gender discrimination that is endemic at Uber and ingrained in its culture,” (NewYorkTimes.com). Rape accusations shouldn’t be taken lightly. For Mr. Alexander and the others involved, to indicate the plaintiffs motives were to increase a rivals company with malicious lies were inaccurate and heinous. The crux in this case is the intrusion of private medical records from a sexual assault. The medical records were being passed around which in turn caused some speculation. The plaintiff Jane Doe was then being accused of falsifying her statement in the 2014 against the Uber driver who raped her. Stealing her medical records and trying to use them is a violation of Jane Doe’s fourth Amendment “unreasonable search and seizure” (Trager, et al.

Show More
Related
311 Words | 2 Pages

The case of Tammy Lou Fontenot v. Taser International, Inc. was about a wrongful death case named Darryl Tuner, a 17-year-old male employed by a grocery store. Darryl was fired for “insubordination” and refused to leave the grocery store. Police were called, and eventually used a Taser in order to take him into custody. Turner died as a result of the Taser being delivered to Turner’s body. Tammy Lou Fontenot filed suit against the City of Charlotte and Taser International seeking money damages for the alleged wrongful death of Darryl Turner.

Read More
1454 Words | 6 Pages

In light of the overwhelming evidence that she took the samples, the clinic's decision to terminate her in the middle of her FMLA leave didn't raise a question of fact about whether her termination was related to her use of FMLA leave. Thus, the court granted the clinic summary judgment on the interference claim. Bloom v. Group Health Plan, Inc., Case No. 12-3060 (MJD/JJG) (D. Minn., Aug. 13, 2014). Bottom line

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Key Facts: (Who are the parties? What are they fighting about? Who is suing whom for what?) Susan Kirkpatrick, Appellant; John Zitz and Transamerica Insurance Company, Appelles; Kirkpatrick originally filed a complaint in trial court for a skunk bite she received while in a pet store owned by John Zitz.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

In the Shea v. Esensten case, there was a lot of information that was compared to different laws. “Mr. Shea's doctor persuaded Mr. Shea, who was then forty years old, that he was too young and did not have enough symptoms to justify a visit to a cardiologist. A few months later, Mr. Shea died of heart failure” (Shea v. Esensten, 1997). The given information brought into question, why would the doctor not make a referral for Mr. Shea? “Mr. Shea had been an employee of Seagate Technologies, Inc. (Seagate) for many years.

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

The gentleman was a victim of a violent assault a few hours earlier. The gentleman’s family sued the hospital for violating EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) provisions that require an appropriate medical screening exam of all Emergency Room patients. What did you learn from the case? All patients in the emergency department should be given the same appropriate medical examinations and services to detect an emergency medical condition.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

The case I chose was the Casey Anthony vs. the state of Florida was a criminal case in which the state of Florida accused Casey Anthony of murdering her two-year-old child Caylee Anthony. On on July 15, 2008 Caylee Anthony was reported missing by her grandmother Cindy Anthony. On July 16, 2008 Casey Anthony was arrested and charged with child neglect. On August 28, 2008 Casey Anthony was released on bail per ABC News. It was held in a Florida state trial and then in trailed again in a Florida district court of appeal.

Read More
1237 Words | 5 Pages

On July 15, 2008, Cindy Anthony announced that her two-year old granddaughter Caylee, had not been seen for nearly a month. Also, she wanted her daughter Casey Anthony taken into custody for robbing a car and money. Casey lied many times to investigators and displayed no emotion about her daughters disappearance. On October 14, 2008, Casey Anthony was arraigned by a Florida grand jury on first degree murder, aggravated child abuse, aggravated manslaughter of a child, and four counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer. Later, human remains were identified as Caylee's on December 11, 2008, in the woods approximately a quarter of a mile from the Anthony residence.

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The UCLA School of medicine .Dr Zhou a licensed Cardiothoracic surgeon in China without any had a clear understanding that his action was the result of retaliation against his superior who informed him of his dismissal for his work performance. Medical information is the property of the patient, they are private often very sensitive no one should access this information just to satisfy their curiosity or to obtain information about other their may have negative feeling for. Dr. Zhou pleased deal was nothing less, but a bargain as that could make a solid case against for violation of privacy since he accessed information about high profile individuals including the state Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, Leonardo DiCapario, Tom Hanks, Drew Barrymore very famous actors whom personal information could be valuable and worth so much in the illegal market of the information age. If pictures of these individuals could be sold for so much even thought there was no found evidence of Dr. Zhou selling the information prior to the court case, the court could strongly make a case against him, under the ground of intend to benefit from the obtained information.

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

A Washington police officer stopped a student at the Washington State University after observing the student was carrying a bottle of gin. After asking the student for identification the student informed him that is was in his dorm room. The student, followed by the officer, then went into his room get his identification. While the student was searching for his identification, the officer noticed that the student 's roommate, had marijuana seeds and a pipe on his desk. The officer asked the students if they had additional drugs in the room and the students provided him with a box with marijuana and money.

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

Casey Anthony became a recognized name in 2008 when she failed to report her two year old daughter, Caylee Anthony, missing until a month after she vanished, and then continued to lie throughout the investigation. It wasn’t even Casey who reported Caylee missing. It was Caylee’s grandmother, Cindy. Casey Anthony was born March 19, 1986 in Warren, Ohio. Her parents are Cynthia (Cindy) and George Anthony and she only has one sibling, who is four years older, Lee Anthony.

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Consistently, when a sexual assault victim speaks out about their expereinces, they . They are shut down, with people claiming that they are only seeking attention. Emily claims “he’s gorgeous… he’s rich” (Anderson 90). D, due to stereotypes in the 1990’s, Andy’s statement (where is Andy’s statement?) is much more significant than Melinda’s.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

Hollywood actress Leah Remini has dared the Church of Scientology to slap her with a lawsuit over the revelations in her A&E docu-series which the organization alleges are all lies. In a “Larry King Now” episode aired on Friday, the host asked Remini for her reaction on the church’s statement about A&E docu-series “Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath” being nothing but a lie and a show for a profit. She then challenged the Church of Scientology to simply sue her over the matter, Entertainment Weekly relays. “Then they should sue us.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Just because she wasn't herself that night doesn’t give you the right to take advantage of her. In the article, "Getting to 'No' " by Susan Dominus talks about sexual assault and how it affects everyone. Although Dominus talks about her experience and others as well, but she lacks facts to back her up. Young women that are in college are sexual assaulted on campus. Susan Dominus is one of the victims, but she doesn't consider herself one.

Read More
1076 Words | 5 Pages

There have been many instances of unauthorized viewing of medical records. Unauthorized viewing of patient records is a violation HIPAA. The HIPAA Privacy Rule requires that “protected health information should not be used or disclosed when it is not necessary to satisfy a particular purpose or carry out a function” (Health and Human Services.gov). The case study in which Joe, a staff member accessed medical information after he was allowed access to the hospital to change lightbulbs and the case study in which the daughter of a nurse accessed medical information as a result of the mother leaving the computer unlocked and unattended, are HIPAA violations (i.e both people accessed the medical information illegally). Joe was tasked with changing a lightbulb, but was curious about a patient he knew on a personal level, his neighbor.

Read More

More about Jane Doe Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document