In reflection to my first icebreaker post, I completed the following sentence "The government can be trusted to do the right thing if they stop.... with the phrase: demeaning the U.S. Constitution and follow what the framers intended." In respect to my former phrase it has not evolved into a new perspective or understanding, but instead, it supported what other political science professors have written. Lawrence C. Dodd & Bruce I. Oppenheimer (2013) in their book Congress Reconsidered, as well as political scientist Michael Nelson (2014), presents in his compilation titled The Presidency and the Political System. All of the previous publications mention how the government has evolved to modern times and it is not functioning as a deliberator for the citizens but rather a powerful bureaucratic institution. …show more content…
Furthering Tulis's over exceed of the divisions of power between branches Dodd & professor of political science Scot Schraufnagel (2013) contend that "party polarization in a two-party system occurs as (1) ideological distance between the majority and minority party increases" and "(2) the loyalty of members to their party increases" (p. 444). Dodd & Schraufnagel (2013) argue that moderation between parties avoid divisions between Congress. By this it suggests that either party utilizes their Constitutional privileges to sway enough members to favor or oppose a bill without having to deliberate. It avoids the very notion of the equal power of branches as the Federalist Paper 51 written by either Alexander Hamilton or James Madison on February 8,