ipl-logo

Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of Utility And Punishment

1172 Words5 Pages

Jeremy Bentham's theory of Utility and Punishment is one of greatest yet failed phisdophys I have ever read. At one point it acturly lays out rules for understand and responding to crimes,however, while making clear rules that cover crimes generally. Bentham oversteps in how he defines punishment and how that affects his argument in a negative making his argument less effective. Bethmen splits his theory into two section ‘General View of cases Unmeet for Punishment’ and ‘Of The Proportion Between Punishment and Offence’. In the the first section Bentham lays out general cases for punishment. The First case he sets out is that the law is there to augment happiness of the community. The second was that punishment was mishef or/and …show more content…

This part countain 6 rules the first is to make crime unprobtile or has he puts it “outweigh the profit of the offense”(59). This is to scary most people straight so to speak. The second rule is to focus on the bigger offense then the lesser one. The third rule is if someone must commit a crime the object is to have the offender choose the lesser crime.The fourth rule is once the offender as committed the ctime the next object is to stop them from doing that crime again. This done by punishing them in every aspect of the crime. For example, if a person robs a bank with an illegal firearm they would be punished for owning a firearm and the atpeted robbery. The fifth rule is to do all this for a cheap price. The sixth rule is the most simple taller each punishment to each …show more content…

Upon the principle of utility, if it at ought at all to be admitted, it ought only to be admitted in as far as it promise to exclude some greater evil” (58). There are several aspects why this statement is incredible wrong. The first is that punishment is mischief or evil. The problem one can run into is that a doctor would never cure cancer by injecting one with ebola.If one was to relate crime as a disease then they can understand that crime is evil and therefore a disease and if punishment is evil and therefore a diese one can run into problems. Additionally punishment by itself cannot exist. Punishment is a reaction to a crime without crime it a different entity,

Show More
Related
585 Words | 3 Pages

Both punishment were different and both cases were used as a way to

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

In the cases of ‘Coker V. Georgia’ and ‘Kennedy V. Louisiana’ a very important question was brought up; does the death penalty constitute for cruel and unusual punishment in regards to the rape of an adult woman or child? Most people can attest to rape being one of the most egregious criminal acts, but how do we keep a fair punishment, and not lose sight of the reasoning in our eighth amendment in such cases? Case Information In the case of Coker V. Georgia, a man by the name of Ehrlich Coker, who was already imprisoned for multiple cases of rape among many other offenses, escaped prison and raped again along with several other unsavory acts. He was sentenced to death for his post-escape rape.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

This is what makes us different from “the brute creation.” I disagree with this, because punishments are needed for people who do wrong things. Punishment, while a form of pain, shows other people the consequence of doing something wrong. In the next point that Bentham makes, he also says this is not a reason to be lenient to wrong doers.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

As we know, there are many ways criminals can be punished. When sentencing happens, the defendant is usually sentenced to the following punishments, listed from minor to extreme: Fines Community service Diversion programs Probation GPS monitoring Jail Prison Death penalty (Rio Salado, 2022). Most of these punishments can be listed under either the utilitarian or retributive theory of punishment. The utilitarian theory seeks to punish offenders to 'deter' future wrongdoings.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

The rationale of this rule is that some crimes are so dangerous, society wants to deter individuals

Read More
691 Words | 3 Pages

The traditional goals of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, incapacitation and rehabilitation (Stinchcomb, 2011). A more contemporary goal of criminal sanctions is restorative and community justice (Stinchcomb, 2011). Retribution is founded on the principle that offenders should receive their ‘just desserts’. However, the penalty must be proportionate to the offence committed (Welch, 2004, p.83) Deterrence aims to reduce criminal offending.

Read More
1310 Words | 6 Pages

Lottery Winners When a person buys a scratch ticket, or a powerball ticket, their hope is that they will win the lottery. If a person wins the lottery, one could claim up to 1.5 billion dollars. Imagine what someone could do with all of that money. There are so many possibilities of great things to do with such a reward and one would be extremely happy to win the lottery. In the short story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, winning the lottery is not something to be happy about.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In other words, mandatory sentencing for repeating offenders that have not learned their lesson and also so they stop committing crimes in the street since they are imprisoned. What the law basically states is that if you are a felon that has two felonies in their record and gets charged with a third felony, you must received the maximum sentence for the type of felony. With this law follows a lot of controversy. Some people believe that it is too harsh and can ruin a person's life. Others believe it is well deserved as you get 3 chances to better yourself.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

The attractiveness of this theory is primarily based on the ethical code that Hampton subscribes to, which is that pain-inflicted punishments should not be condoned when it comes to disciplining wrongdoers. Rather, constructive analysis done pertaining to why certain actions are morally wrong in society would be intellectually stimulating and productive for both the wrongdoers and the public, all while avoiding the infliction of physical pain. Compared to the retributivist argument, which circulates around the idea that the purpose of punishment is to make wrongdoers pay for their misdeeds, and that they should be treated the way that they have treated others, the MET is a more humane way to treat wrongdoers, and in the long run, would perhaps help them emerge from confinement as better citizens within society, rather than as potential repeat offenders. Therefore, the appeal of the MET stems from the positive implications of treating wrongdoers with respect and dignity, all while teaching them why their actions were wrong while simultaneously instilling positive and moral values in their psyche before allowing them to re-enter

Read More
246 Words | 1 Pages

Religious philosophy views on punishment differ as definitions lay at opposite ends on a scale. Punishment is an action necessary to have a debt repaid. Ethics matters as a person’s or social group can be under the wrong or right hand. Punishment is a punitive action done to make the offender repay the debt they incurred. It is done for the benefit of the offended (Old Testament in Christian Bible).

Read More
1479 Words | 6 Pages

Punishment serves as a method to deter people from wrongdoings, and to let people know what actions are wrong. If there were no negative repercussions to wrongful acts, people would simply attribute their wrongdoings to determinism and claim they are not morally responsible for their actions, since their actions stem from prior causes that they have no control

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Offense, guilt, and punishment are the three basic concepts of Western criminal law. It is upon these basic concepts that conduct is deemed criminal. As stated

Read More
1939 Words | 8 Pages

As people became more individualized however beliefs and values would shift so the law needed to reflect the ideals and values of the society. Within David Garland’s chapter on punishment and social solidarity he recognises that punishment is not necessarily in place to correct behaviour but to keep society as a whole. While there is a correlation between punishment and criminal activity to keep society intact there has to be in a place a set of values within the legal system that force a kind of communality. People who enter the prison system are made examples of representing what a society values. It can be a person being imprisoned for life due to murder or for thievery within each society there are consequences for deviating from values.

Read More
1076 Words | 5 Pages

These 6 cardinal principles are: (i) Judicial Deference; (ii) Classification of offences; (iii) construction of criminal liability: element of offences and defences; (iv) Significance of maximum penalties; (v) ease of proof and peculiar knowledge; and (vi) presumption of innocence. Each of the principles influences the courts on examining the reversal burden differently. Judicial

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

Read More

More about Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of Utility And Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document