Case: State v. Mire (2016 WL 314814, 2014-2295 (La. 1/27/16)). Facts: On February 9, 2011 Quint Mire shot and killed Julian Gajan during an out-of-season deer hunting trip In Little Prairie marsh. Mire picked up all of his shell casings and did not attempt to help Gajan. Mire did not go straight to the authorities but he tried to cast suspension on others.
The defense argued that the peremptory strikes were based off of race. Snyder appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which found that the judge did not act unreasonably in dismissing the case as a Batson violation. This case parallels the case at hand. The prosecutor used their peremptory strikes to remove the black jurors for pretext reasons, not justifiable ones. In Foster’s case, the court used reasons such as the jurors being too close in age to the defendant, Foster, to strike a prospective juror.
Livi’s Arms and Accessories has everything a hunter could ever need. Livi’s offers a variety of weapons for bow and gun season, and even recreational weapons just for fun. Livi’s also offers a variety of apparel for hunters: Overalls, thermal clothes, work boots, and other equipment necessary for hunting. The primary costumers that are attracted to the store are hunters, or people in need of weapons or work apparel. The majority of the customers will be over the age of eighteen, and will derive from areas of forest, rivers, lakes, mountains, and rural areas.
Collins, 506 U.S. 390). The case was complicated because the state had already met its expenses and burden to prove during trial that the convict was guilty of the capital murder beyond judicious doubt. The presumption of innocence disappears when a person is convicted. According to the petitioner, he claims that the evidence that was not presented in court proved him innocent the verdict notwithstanding.
In 1967 two men robbed a bank in Eustace, Texas. One man, with two pieces of tape on his face, went into the bank, pointed a gun at the cashier and demanded the money. His partner waited outside in a stolen getaway car. Wade and his partner were indicted for the robbery and counsel was appointed. About two weeks later, a FBI agent caused the two men to be part of a lineup consisting of five or six other men at which the bank employees were asked to make an identification, and at which the two men were in fact identified.
In conclusion, Montana Lost and The US Supreme Court decision was
Issue (3): regardless of whether or not the individual actually committed the crime, when an individual cannot afford an attorney, if found guilty should individuals who crime was perceived as heinous be sentenced to death? Decision: The majority of the United States Supreme Court opinion reversed and remanded the court verdicts of the Alabama Supreme Court (7-2). The Supreme Court stated that due process and right to counsel of the Scottsboro boys had been violated during Alabama’s court case. Opinion: (Majority) the 7-2 majority opinion ultimately overturned the convictions of the nine Scottsboro boys.
However, I believe the Supreme Court in Staples achieved this
The South Carolina vs. Katzenbach case was established based off the U.S. Supreme Court on the Voting Rights Act of 1965. On March 1965, the Voting Rights Act offered the federal government new powers to fight the alienation of African Americans prolonged by the southern government. Many Southerners didn’t approve Congress’ decision to pass this legislation. The people of the south argued and believed that the U.S congress had violated their states’ rights.
(2014). The Trayvon Martin Trial - Two Comments and an Observation. The John Marshall Law Review, 47(4), 11th ser. Retrieved February 21, 2018, from https://repository.jmls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=2086&context=lawreview.
The Fourth Amendment the Search and Seizure amendment was first passed by Congress on September 25, 1789 (National Constitution Center) that states the right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (National Constitution Center). For the first one hundred years after this amendment was This amendment of the Constitution has been used by both civilians and governmental officials as proof of why they believe an incident that occurred was fair, or unfair. However, there have been times when deciding the fairness or unfairness has not been crystal clear. For instance, the case of Tennessee v. Garner that was first argued on October 30, 1984, and later decided upon on March
About two decades later, there was a Supreme Court case named
Another issue that was discussed is the inequality of death penalty in practice. There have been serious issues with racial discrimination. For reference in cases with white victims and black defendants convictions occurred twenty two percent of the time while with black victims and white defendants with percentage dropped to a measly three
It was decided that such decisions would be left up to the Court. The Court completely abandoned the clear wording of the 9th Amendment by adopting this position. The second change was the outcome from the Supreme Court decision of the Griswold vs. Connecticut case in
In the Escobedo v. Illinois trial, defendant Danny Escobedo was accused of his brother-in-law’s death. Leading up to the trial, the defendant’s brother-in-law was shot and killed. Although, Escobedo was brought in for questioning, he did not make a statement. When arrested, Escobedo was not informed of his right to keep silent. Escobedo was released from questioning with the help of his lawyer through a state court writ of habeas corpus.
