In the 1960s the Americans were looking for a President who could fix the issues that Eisenhower had caused. The people of the United States wanted a President that would bring the country together and unite them through an active but productive leadership position. The Democrats introduced a candidate to the United States that they hoped would bring the country the united nation that they had been longing for. John Fitzgerald Kennedy’s campaign promised the American people the “New Frontier.” Kennedy was able to get approval for tariff reductions and wanted to cut taxes so within time he could create prosperity through economic growth.
The first article is inaugural address, January 20, 1961, by John F. Kennedy. The second is an article “Inside Kennedy’s Inauguration, 50 Years On,” writer Eleanor Clift. The last document is a photograph of the swearing-in ceremony “ inauguration of John F. Kennedy by the United States army signal corps. These three documents have a lot of in comment but different story. The first document is about John F. Kennedy making a speech about the humanity and the American people to be strong and while they support each other.
“There is no such thing as defeat in nonviolence” (Chavez). In the 1960s, America believed it was standing on the Golden Age. On January 20, 1961, John F. Kennedy became President of the United States. During his presidential campaign in 1960, John F. Kennedy had made a set of laws called the “New Frontier,” which was a package of laws and reforms that sought to eliminate injustice and inequality in the United States. It was not until 1964, Kennedy was shot and President Lyndon B. Johnson assumed the presidency.
Liberalism was very evident throughout the John F. Kennedy and the Lyndon Johnson years (1960-1968). During the Democratic National Convention of 1960, Kennedy announced his “New Frontier” theme for his administration’s drive to confront the “unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered pockets of ignorance and prejudice, [and the] unanswered questions about poverty and surplus”. (Roark, p. 933) Kennedy began his administration “promising activism and renewal and offering a new style of leadership that boasted of youth, energy, and effectiveness”.
Ironically, Kennedy was not viewed by the public as such a candidate. Many Americans viewed Kennedy as inexperienced because of his youth. However, Kennedy’s youth would be a pivotal factor in transforming the 1960s into a “New Frontier”. On a bitterly cold January day, JFK delivered
The emotional appeal of hope, that emulates from the quest towards peace, will unlock roads that lead to new destinations. The road will not be easy, but in this inaugural address. Kennedy really used the emotional and ethical appeals to drive his ambitions to the hearts of every person reading, or listening, that now is the time to “let us go forth” (Kennedy 806) and begin anew in this conquest for a better tomorrow. He integrated the perfect tone for each circumstance that he brought up in his speech. Kennedy appropriately offered both a cause and effect for what could have been a very serious problem, but showed a solution to overcoming even this obstacle.
By signifying the time, it is signifying change for the new era, inspiring the audience to support the ideas Kennedy has prepared. This also symbolizes the audience’s excitement to the change by using words like celebration and victory. This helps create positivity to the new “beginning” that is coming. The juxtaposition used in John F. Kennedy’s writing has strengthened his argument and
John F Kennedy was a level headed, determined and well accomplished person. During his short-lived presidency, he had to take on challenges like no other and did it with sophistication and grace. From conflicts involving other countries, like Vietnam, to the Civil Rights Movement that directly affected our own country, Kennedy continued to take each problem day by day until there was an overall improvement or resolution. It would be safe to say that he is one of the more progressive presidents our country has ever seen. David Burner’s John F. Kennedy and a New Generation was written with the sole purpose of giving an insight into Kennedys upbringing and presidency in an entirely unbiased approach.
Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson both pursued domestic policies aimed at addressing economic and social inequalities in America. One of the similarities between their policies was the implementation of federal programs to combat poverty. Kennedy’s New Frontier program focused on boosting economic growth and creating jobs through tax cuts, while Johnson’s Great Society program was geared towards creating a “War on Poverty” and increasing access to education and healthcare. Additionally, both presidents supported efforts to increase the minimum wage and expand labor protections for workers. In terms of education reform, Kennedy emphasized the importance of improving access to higher education through the establishment of the National Defense Education Act and the creation of the Peace Corps, while Johnson sought to expand access to education for all Americans through the Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
The alliance for progress was a program designed to improve US relations with Latin America. According to the book, “ The US and Latin America”, “ Kennedy stated , would create a new alliance for progress, one that would assist free men and free governments in casting off the
In 1890, the United States Census Bureau deemed the large and intimating Western American Frontier “closed”. How does the Frontier “close”? Why was the Frontier so important to American identity? How does the closure of the Frontier affect Black Americans, Immigrants and First Nations, and how did Social Darwinism coupled with Eugenics influence American action? In this paper, I will discuss how the Frontier was “closed”, its importance, and its closure, along with Eugenics and Social Darwinism, affected minorities present in America.
On April 4, 1968, Robert F. Kennedy was in Indianapolis for a campaign stop, when he received news that Martin Luther King was killed, causing Kennedy to write and deliver a speech regarding the assassination. This speech was succinct but not only was it about the assassination, it was also to tell the people there is still wisdom and hope in this time of turmoil. To reach this purpose, he first builds up his ethos, uses pathos to add mood and hope, and unifies the people. The combination of these elements makes it a very powerful and memorable speech. Robert F. Kennedy builds his credibility by relating his personal experience and knowledge of what the audience is feeling to the current events.
Throughout the 19th century European settlers in the United States were enthralled by Westward expansion, furthermore, defining the Western region of the country as the ‘frontier’ to represent the challenges and opportunities expanding West would institute. Westward expansion was significantly driven by the concept of Manifest destiny which describes the idea that Europeans have the divine power and inherent right to expand across North America (Burton, January 17th, 2023). Westward expansion was legally encouraged and endorsed by the federal government through the Homestead act of 1862. The Homestead Act encouraged Westward migration/ settlement by offering land grants to settlers from the East willing to migrate to the West to develop the land.
Many people can still remember right where they were when they found out JFK was killed. For many it was a traumatic incident that they will never forget. Throughout JFK’s life he had many accomplishments, and also along with failures. Throughout it all the U.S. still looked up to him with admiration. After his death there has been many conspiracy theories, mistrust in the federal government, U.S. engagement with Vietnam, The Great Society, and so much more.
The Kennedy-Johnson years (1961-1969) provided the stimulant for social and economic re-form, but most of their policy initiatives were confounded by domestic strife and foreign policy failure. Discuss. The 1960s heralded a period of both social and economic change as both John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson attempted to continue the legacy of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s ‘New Deal’. However, “competing domestic and foreign policy constituencies” stymied some of their efforts at reform therefore whilst in many cases their policies stimulated reform in later decades much of their energies in the 1960s were focused overseas.
