ipl-logo

John Locke Vs Hobbes

647 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Comparing john locke and thomas hobbes

“Society is inside of man and man is inside society, and you cannot even create a truthfully drawn psychological entity on the stage until you understand his social relations and their power to make him what he is and to prevent him from being what he is not. The fish is in the water and the water is in the fish,” once proclaimed Arthur Miller. During the time of the 17th century, quarrels of power and order were on the rise. Among the quarrels were two of the most influential philosophers of government: John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists and natural law theorists. These men proudly expressed their own political philosophies concerning the disorder of the time. Hobbes focused his ideas on humankind. …show more content…

His philosophies of government, although, created quite a stir. He wanted an absolute monarch for his philosophical government. He figured that people were born with a social contract that were rights to relinquish the government for safety. Unlike Locke, he was under the belief that humankind was wicked, cruel, and selfish because they only did what they wanted to do. Freedom was not a considering factor for Hobbes due to the fact that people could not be trusted to govern themselves. Instead, the monarchy would enforce obedient behavior to keep the law in order. Due to Hobbes, the government had total and full control over the people and the people under it’s rule could not do anything to stop it. Since the ideas of Locke and Hobbes are so drastically different, it is not hard to choose which one would be better to form a society and base a government upon. Locke is more open-minded and ‘for’ the people. Whereas, Hobbes is insisting on a more powerful government rather than letting things remain equal. Between the two, Locke would form a more significant and adequate environment for his democracy over the people. He is definitely considerable of his people, rather than being a power-hungry overseer. His ideas are much more reasonable than Hobbes, due to the favor of the

Show More
Related

Locke Vs Hobbes Dbq

559 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were early English philosophers who each had very different views on the roles of the government and the people being governed. Their interpretations of human nature each had a lasting and vast impact on modern political science. Locke believed that men had the right to revolt against oppressive government. “‘Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.”

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq

1053 Words | 5 Pages

He believed people act selfishly, so they could not be trusted to make their own decisions. Hobbes said that the only purpose of a government was to protect people from their own evil and

Read More

Stereotypes In John Hughes's Film The Breakfast Club

1745 Words | 7 Pages

John Hughes’s film The Breakfast Club (1985) resonates with certain modern-day stereotypes of high school students. The film also reflects on how much damage that social status and labels have on people, especially during adolescence. Hughes’s film breaks down the emotional barriers between ordinary high school students of different backgrounds through typecasting. As the actors take on the general roles of students that can be found in most high schools, the narrative of the story begins to drastically change as the characters are revealing their backgrounds with each other. As a result of using this technique, the film reveals the external and internal struggles that most adolescent children deal with in their lives.

Read More

Hobbes Locke Dbq

789 Words | 4 Pages

Hobbes and locke were two philosophers who two different ideas on the world and human behavior as a whole. Hobbes mainly believed that without any form of government people will always be trying to fight for power. On the other hand, Locke believed everyone is born peaceful but can be corrupted by society. Hobbes and Locke both had very different views on different human nature, the purpose of government, and both had a big influence on many different countries.

Read More

The Enlightenment Dbq Essay

898 Words | 4 Pages

John Locke believed in a democracy and expressed that humans have the ability to govern themselves. However, Hobbes believed that humans are selfish and need a single leader(king) that should govern all affairs. Post French Revolution people lived under Hobbes theory, but wanted to become a democracy.

Read More

Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Research Paper

624 Words | 3 Pages

Hobbes believed that natural state of humans was violent and therefore needed order and control to ensure a just and equal society (Robinson 2016, 4). However Hobbes believed that a sovereign could maintain power without deceit and manipulation. Hobbes believed in the social contract which is when people could have a moral understanding about right and wrong to avoid the chaotic violent human nature. Hobbes believed in the idea of utilitarianism which would “maximize the most good and minimize the pain” (Robinson 201, 4). This would ensure that the sovereign was doing things for the right reasons and not to better himself but to better society as a

Read More

Descartes And Hobbes: A Comparative Analysis

1710 Words | 7 Pages

With their philosophic stance, it is first necessary to be clear about the fundamental nature of political reality. What are the key constituting ingredients of political life? Hobbes finds the great drive for self-preservation and the passions plus a calculating self-interest as chief factors. Locke finds natural equality and liberty plus the great rights. In both cases, the method is to go behind culture and civilization and to discover the original, natural, and basic parts that will form the whole.

Read More

Locke And Hobbes Influence On Modern Politics

1392 Words | 6 Pages

As we know Hobbes agreed totally in absolute monarchy. He even said that the purpose of the government was to impose the law and order to prevent the state of war. Also, he believed that a government headed by a king was the best form that a society could take. That if we placed all power in the hands of the king would mean more resolute and consistent exercise of political authority, he said. In the other hand Locke said that the purpose of a government should be to secure natural rights, namely man property and liberty.

Read More

Hobbes Vs Rawls Analysis

1591 Words | 7 Pages

According to Hobbes, a sovereign, whether the sovereign was placed into power by violence or force, is the only way to secure law and order. For him, if a citizen obeys the sovereign for fear of punishment or in the fear of the state of nature, it is the choice of the citizen. According to Hobbes, this is not tyranny; it is his idea of a society that is successful, one that does not have room for democracy. As a realist, Hobbes has a fierce distrust of democracy and viewed all of mankind in a restless desire for power. If the people are given power, law and order would crumble in Hobbes’ eyes.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes Influence On Thomas Jefferson's Declaration Of Enlightenment

493 Words | 2 Pages

One his theories, stated in his book called Leviathan said that people are not able rule themselves because of how selfish mankind is and they need to be ruled by an iron fist. His political theory was that was also stated in Leviathan was that we should respect government authority under all circumstances to avoid violence. Hobbes was scared of the outcome of the social contract which meant people could get rid of the government if they were unhappy with what they were getting. In order to make well with the social contract he states in Leviathan that people should be completely obedient to the government. His reasoning was that if there was no government, there would be chaos.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More

Hobbes Separation Of Power

234 Words | 1 Pages

Hobbes’ philosophy can be found within the novel in many points of the story. He believed that the best kind of government was one in which society is organized under one authority, “Where there is no common power, there is no law; where no law, no justice.” In this society all individuals give up some rights for the sake of protection. There is no doctrine of separation of powers in Hobbes’ discussion. Although Hobbes philosophy about human nature is logical and compatible with human rationale, his political theories involving leadership; though sensible in part are illogical.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

419 Words | 2 Pages

Thomas Hobbes began presenting his political philosophies in different ways to different audiences. In these he rejected Aristotle’s theses about humans being naturally suited to political life; Hobbes believed humans were actually unnaturally suited to it. He thought that people were easily swayed, and competed with and criticized each other. Later on Hobbes went on to publish his social contract stating people usually trade their liberty for safety. He defines contract as “the mutual transferring of right.”

Read More

Thomas Hobbes And The English Civil War

737 Words | 3 Pages

Hobbes, one of the greatest political theorists of all time, believes his idea of how a society should be governed is superior to any other form of governing because his has been developed through a scientific approach. It seems, however, that his ideas are formed not so much by science but by the events of his time, especially the English Civil War. Hobbes believed the Sovereign of a society did not necessarily have to be a single individual (like the Monarch) but could also be a group of officials (like the parliament), what was essential to Hobbes was that all people be in awe of the Sovereign’s power. The power held by the Sovereign must be sufficient to cause fear in the minds of the individual men. This seems rather outdated but what

Read More

Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

1084 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

Read More

More about John Locke Vs Hobbes

Related Topics

Open Document