John Locke was born during a time of political upheaval in England and other European nations. It is this politically unstable environment that most likely inspired him to write is Second Treatise of Government. In this book Locke proposes solutions to the instability mainly through implementation of a limited government which uses political power to protect individual’s property. He is widely regarded as a strong defender of limited government and his legacy lives on in the constitutions of many modern nations including the United States, in which his work was highly influential in promoting democracy.
For Locke, the only type of legitimate government is one that has the consent of the majority. Therefore Locke felt that a legitimate contract
…show more content…
At first glance this does not sound like a limited government, but Locke has this to say regarding the abuse of power by the executive, “When the legislative hath put the execution of the laws they make into other hands, they have a power still to resume it out of those hands, when they find cause, and to punish for any mal-administration against the laws.” [Locke 2011, 752] This seems like a fine solution for abuses on behalf of the executive, but what of abuses by the legislative? Locke states that, “When any one, or more, shall take upon them to make laws, whom the people have not appointed so to do, they make laws without authority, which the people are not therefore bound to obey… [the people] may constitute to themselves a new legislative, as they thing best, being in full liberty to …show more content…
Why should we be ruled by government when we could live in a natural state of anarchy with all of our fundamental rights intact? Locke calls this state, the state of nature and gives reason as to why people leave this state in exchange for a political society, “If man in the state of nature be so free… if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to nobody, why will he part with his freedom? Why will he give up this empire, and subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? … The enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecure. This makes him willing to quit this condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others… for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties, and estates, which I call by the general name, property.” [Locke 2011, 744-755] The concept of property is very important to Locke. He says it is protection of one’s property which includes one’s own life that is the driving force which leads people to seek out preservation of their property by joining together in society and forming governments. Locke constantly reiterates the importance of retaining ones property and how the government is not to violate