John Proctor's Reputation In The Crucible

556 Words3 Pages

In Arthur Miller's, The Crucible, having a good name was very important. People took great pride in being prominent. Although, there were some who would do anything to keep their prestige name. A few confess while others go as far as lying and killing to keep their name from being blackened. The preservation of John Proctor, Reverend Samuel Parris, and Judge Thomas Danforth’s reputation is on the line. Similarities and differences of those characters actions show whether they believe a good name or the truth is more important. A sinful yet passionate man, John Proctor knows he has wronged his wife and lied to many. Proctor committed Adultery with Abigail Williams and had his heart set on not letting a soul know about it. John lied constantly to try and keep his good name until it came down to life or death for his wife, Elizabeth Proctor. Although Proctor wanted to keep a clean record, he decided saving his wife is worth telling the truth. He admitted to committing Adultery with Abigail when Elizabeth was mentioned in the court. John was thrown in jail. Danforth comes to John and offers him to sign a confession so he may be kept from hanging. Proctor´s mindset is stuck on his name. He says to Judge Danforth, ¨I have given you my soul; leave me my name!¨ (pg. 240) After signing the confession, he tore it up. John would …show more content…

He will do anything to keep it, even if it means lying. When Parris is asked about what he had seen in the woods, he did not give them the whole truth. It was said that the girls were dancing in the woods although, Reverend Parris had not mentioned they were naked. Parris also knows that some of the people who were accused are innocent. He did not want to testify against the accusers because that could lead to him being accused. Parris could not have his good name destroyed. If it were, he believe he would be treated poorly and never to be thought of highly