ipl-logo

Morality In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

1698 Words7 Pages

Out of the approximately seven billion people currently living, it is safe to assume that I vehemently disagree with the actions or morals of at least one of these individuals. However, introspectively speaking, the existence of this person and the manner in which they conduct their life do not seem to diminish the quality of my well being. As a result of this feeling, the question arises as to whether it would be appropriate to force a change in this stranger’s livelihood on behalf of my disdain? John Stuart Mill in his philosophical work, On Liberty, describes his viewpoint on this controversy. To summarize, Mill believes the claim that as long as the selfishly beneficial actions of an individual do not cause harm to others this behavior …show more content…

Patrick Devlin, in his philosophical piece, The Enforcement of Morals, speaks in-depth about the importance of a societal morality. In large part he attests that a society functions properly when a shared morality is present amongst it’s people, therefore any violation of that collective mindset will threaten the foundation that holds a society together . Devlin proceeds his argument even further by stating, “Immorality then, for the purpose of the law, is what every right-minded person is presumed to consider to be immoral” . If the predicament involving the obese man and his actions is analyzed through the lens of Devlin’s notion, it can be claimed that although these actions are not harmful to other members of society, these actions are opposed by the general consensus of people, thus posing a threat to that society’s existence and advocating for immorality. Although this statement seems rather hyperbolic in regards to a sole obese man choosing to eat unhealthy foods, it carries more significance if a group of individuals decide to adopt this lifestyle. Actions that pose no harm in solidarity begin to morph the characteristics of a society if these behaviors begin to spread and cascade. Along with this potential detriment to community values, the actions that once seemed to cause …show more content…

These people are dealt punishments in various forms to either correct their behavior or to serve as retribution. If we assume an obese man choosing to eat unhealthy foods in solidarity is a danger to the moral principles of a society, then according to Devlin’s logic this man should be punished as a criminal. It seems rather unethical to punish a man for eating the foods he wishes to consume especially considering it causes no immediate harm to his community. Nevertheless, in the viewpoint of Devlin’s ideology, this obese man should be criminalized just as a murderer, rapist, or robber would. A murder or a rapist causes a direct harm to an individual and could possibly incite an omnipresent sense of fear within a community, so from a utilitarian standpoint it is clear that these actions should be deemed morally impermissible. However, Devlin and his beliefs on human action fall short in situations in which a person’s behavior causes no harm. From a utilitarian standpoint no individual’s happiness is diminished and the potential for a society’s moral principles to crumble based off of this one action is unjustified. It is also presumptuous to assume that the behavior of one individual will eventually influence others. This concern of widespread adoption is simply one of an infinite number of realities that may develop for this society. In this same

Show More
Related
967 Words | 4 Pages

This excerpt showcases the mentality the leaders of this society have and how well they've implemented it to make it seem as though collectivism and abolishing individualism is for the greater good, but just because their forefathers had the right intention does not mean to say they had the right way to do it. It's perfectly fine to have rules to keep people in line, but when it starts to kill the soul of a person and it keeps them from doing something so human as asking questions, these rules become simply cruel

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

Eren Karaaslan Mrs. Clausnitzer American Literature February 22 2016 Illuminati The concept of morality is determined by one overarching factor, whether or not someone values other’s well being over their own, even if it leads to their own detriment. This can be seen by every day medical procedures such as liver transplants where patients risk their lives in order to save another, someone they may not even know, even if they themselves have a risk of death. On the contrary many people become immoral when greed consumes them and they value themselves over all else (insert example if possible).

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

In the distorted town of Salem, Massachusetts, opposing opinions caused its inhabitants to turn against each other. What drove them was trying to save their own lives, the possibility of gaining something for themselves, or rarely, to save someone else’s life. In literature and real life, a character or person that agrees with the ideals of a community is likely to stand with the group because they want to show their

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Sydney Krcmarik AP Argument Essay 30 January 2023 Disobedience Sparks Progression Oscar Wilde’s statement about disobedience being a valuable way to promote social change is valid as long as those who are fighting remember that they are fighting to bring positive change to their community. When citizens are motivated to really see change and think more about their community as a whole, rather than their own personal power, real change is possible. For example, Susan B. Anthony’s fight for women's rights led to her doing many disobedient acts. Nonetheless, she did them unapologetically, knowing that she was bringing necessary change and progress. However, when the angry civilians of the French Revolutions rebelled, their leaders tried to strike

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Individuals vs. Society The Salem Witch Trials, of the strangest accounts of mass hangings in history, were the fault of a few young women. In Arthur Miller’s The Crucible, John Proctor is forced to make a decision as to whether or not to give up his good name to save this small town. People have to choose between self-interest and that which would benefit the society in which they live. Often, people face some great cause prior to choosing to help the greater society over their own selfish wants.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

According to Milgram, every human has the dual capacity to function as an individual exercising his or her own moral judgement and the capacity to make their own moral decisions based on their personal character. Yet, what happens to an average person who is obedient to authority when it overrides their own moral judgement? It is ironic that “virtues of loyalty, discipline, and self-sacrifice that we value so highly in the individual are the very properties that create destructive organizational engines of war and bind men to malevolent systems of authority” (Miller, Stanley Milgram). His gruesome experiment is considered by some to be one of the darkest in the field. In a series of about 20 experiments, hundreds of decent, well-intentioned

Read More
1325 Words | 6 Pages

Caleb Stephens April 15, 2017 Introduction to Philosophy The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that Philippa Foot’s objection, raised to her own argument against utilitarianism, is correct. Her initial thesis is that benevolence, while the foundation of utilitarianism, is an internal end of morality, rather than the ultimate end of morality. The possible objection to this that there must be some overarching reason behind morality, which must imply a form of consequentialism. The response she offers is that there should be some other form of morality, which is a weak argument, as it does not provide an alternate conception of morality itself.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

A recent study conducted by Andy Dwyer concluded that people will blindly follow morally questionable orders given by peers. Andy Dwyer states, “ What I found is the same situational factors that affected obedience in Milgram's experiments still operate today.” These studies demonstrate people's capacity for evil and support the idea that people's morals are greatly influenced by others. This precept is also relevant to the theme of “The Lottery.” Ignorance has always been prevalent in society.

Read More
669 Words | 3 Pages

All through history, notable figures have endeavored to characterize or order moral conduct. Similarly, in life, we endeavor to gauge ourselves against what is good and bad. To makes these judgments, we use our experience, elements of our faith in the divine, what we take in from notable public voices, what we have learned from society, from mentors, and from our parents. Since, no has ultimately circumscribed what genuinely moral and what isn't, we each have to make the best choices available.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone in class agreed that people rebel when a value of theirs is thwarted. Various arguments developed during discussion regarding what classifies as rebellion and whether or not it is effective; however, these seemingly conflicting arguments actually contribute to the general concept of rebellion in distinct ways. The class first defined rebellion as standing up to society for wrongly thwarting a value and trying to bring about change by setting an example to influence other people to join the cause. Under this definition, rebellion is rarely effective because in order for a societal change to occur, there must be enough people that join the rebellion, and these people must remain loyal and dedicated to the cause.

Read More
1565 Words | 7 Pages

Bernard Williams’ essay, A Critique of Utilitarianism, launches a rather scathing criticism of J. J. C. Smart’s, An Outline of a System of Utilitarian ethics. Even though Williams claims his essay is not a direct response to Smart’s paper, the manner in which he constantly refers to Smart’s work indicates that Smart’s version of Utilitarianism, referred to as act-Utilitarianism, is the main focus of Williams’ critique. Smart illustrates the distinction between act-Utilitarianism and rule-Utilitarianism early on in his work. He says that act-Utilitarianism is the idea that the rightness of an action depends on the total goodness of an action’s consequences.

Read More
1157 Words | 5 Pages

Association and intuition are really powerful tools in the human psyche and more often than not they will produce the same results as slow methodical reason. When it comes to social change, questioning the righteousness of a cause can often detract from that movement’s efficacy, splintering a group that should have one clear purpose. At some point a distinction must be made for what is practical or have a positive effect and that which will have little to no positive

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

The Doctrine of Double Effect often refers to actions that have two relevant effects, in which they include: people whom we bring about, and those that we see but do not have a set goal for. This refers to the following, “Provided that your goal is worthwhile, you are sometimes permitted to act in ways that foreseeably cause certain types of harm, though you must never intend to cause such harms” (Landau, 2015, p. 224). Consequently, many people are lured by absolutism, since it is the one and only way to overcome consequentialism. To bring good in, absolutists need to portray their side and grant people the vision of previous arguable cases, without counting on hidden ‘consequentialist assumptions’. According to Alison Mclntyre, “According to the principle of double effect, sometimes it is permissible to cause a harm as a side effect (or “double effect”) of bringing about a good result even though it would not be permissible to cause such a harm as a means to bringing about the same good end” (Mclntyre, 2014, p. 1).

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

If people have no place to voice their will or take part in deciding their own destiny, the community might grow disinterested and passive in their relationship with their government. Mill believes this is problematic for society because history, as he sees it, has shown that more democratic societies have more ‘energetic, and ‘developed’ societies as well as more ‘go ahead characters’ not seen in more totalitarian societies. Yet, this criticism might fail to cover a deeper problem of disinterest; it might lead to a level of moral deficiency as well. Mill fears that a loss of ability and activity, leads to a society losing its sense of communal responsibility and social justice. In their aloofness, people might be less inclined to believe that they have any responsibility to society since society has ceased to have any rights or purpose under absolute authority.

Read More

More about Morality In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

Related Topics

Open Document