ipl-logo

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

668 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: John stuart mill's version of utilitarianism

Lalnunpuii Huber
Essay 2
Professor Daniel Jenkins
October 22, 2017

Mill’s Utilitarian Theory

John Stuart Mill is a British philosopher, political economist, civil servant and member of parliament from London, England (May 20, 1806 – May 8, 1873). He was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century and was the godson of an English philosopher and founder of utilitarianism, Jeremy Benthan. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill is an essay that is written to provide support to the theory of utilitarianism and to respond to any confusions around it.
Mill defines Utilitarianism in chapter two as a theory based on the principle that “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse …show more content…

He states that there are different qualities of pleasure. There are simple pleasures like eating and drinking and basic instincts and there are also higher pleasures like studying for a test, music, art and other intellectual accomplishments. According to Mill, the higher pleasures are intrinsically better quality than the lower pleasures. When making any moral judgement, the theory utilitarianism, “takes into account quality as well as quantity” (p6) from the pleasure. Quality is determined by someone who has experienced both the two pleasures. He makes his argument by saying that, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied. And if the fool or the pig think otherwise, that is because they know only their own side of the question” (p8). We can conclude by saying that the best judge of pleasure’s quality in Mills opinion are people who have experienced both higher and lower pleasure. Mill also stated that happiness consisted of, “a few brief pains, and many and various pleasures”. Happiness is attainable by proper education and mental cultivation. He also believes that it is certainly possible to do without happiness, it is not desirable nor even noble to do so. Mill argues that the Martyr must sacrifice happiness only if it increases the sum of total happiness and only if it is for a greater cause to alleviate the suffering of others. If there is no benefit for others, he states that “other purpose doesn’t deserve admiration more than does the ascetic living on top of his pillar”

Show More
Related
1060 Words | 5 Pages

This ideology is notably similar to John Stuart mill's philosophy of utilitarianism, “actions are right

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

The object of this essay is to show a simple evaluation of john Stuart mill principle “an action is right that it does not cause harm to another person” I will be exercising both evaluations and explaining why the positive side outweighs the negative side of the principle, in a society that it’s people are emancipated to control their own opinions. Mill Stuart in his autobiography of 1873 he narrates liberty as a philosophic chronicle of indivisible accuracy. (Mill (1989.edn).p.189) rather than speaking of rights, many claim a ‘right’ not to be harmed ,mill says that only a harm or risk to harm is enough vindication for using power above someone else. John Stuart moreover he adequate his principle by reckoning that it is not good to use power

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

John Stuart Mill was a British philosopher well known as a proponent for utilitarianism and as a student of Jeremy Bentham, the founder of modern utilitarianism. Mill believed in personal liberty and that individual liberty was the best way to run society. He was a staunch believer in freedom of speech. Mill believed that it was important to hear everybody’s opinion, especially irreligious speech, no matter how much one might disagree with them, as it could turn out that someone else’s opinion may be correct. One of Mill’s premises is that everybody is that anybody is capable of being wrong.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

John Stuart Mill and the Catholic Church have two completely different methods of analysis. They may result in the same conclusion at times, but for completely different reasons. John Stuart Mill is the founder of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism says happiness is pleasure, and is hedonistic. The purpose of Utilitarianism is follow that the right choice is the one that leads to the greatest amount of pleasure (or least amount of pain) for the greatest amount of people.

Read More
1618 Words | 7 Pages

This objection states that Mill is crude to consider humans as being so simple that they can only consider pleasure and pain, much line a pig only cares about slop and mud. Mill responds by making it clear that the pleasures her refer to, are not simply bodily pleasures. He explains that humans are capable of a higher level of pleasures than those of an animal. He felt that animals are only able to experience mere bodily sensation (lower pleasures) while humans pleasures can be intellectual, sentimental, imaginative, and emotional (higher pleasures).

Read More
1533 Words | 7 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that focuses on outcomes and consequences. When one considers the theory of utilitarianism, it must be understood that the pleasure is a fundamental moral good and the aim is to maximize pleasure and minimize pain. So, when a human is going through the decision making process it is of the utmost importance to look forward at the consequences of the decision and determine if the decision will maximize pleasure and minimize pain. John Stuart Mill, a nineteenth century philosopher focused on the theory of utilitarianism or the Greatest Happiness Principle and claimed that the maximization of happiness for the greatest quantity of people is the ultimate goal. One issue that we face in modern day America that

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

Mill describes utilitarianism like a hypothesis depend on the basis that if people tend to behave like promoting happiness, it would be a true

Read More
1046 Words | 5 Pages

The Goal of Life In order to judge the importance of these values in enriching our lives, we must first define what makes a life enriched. Mustapha Mond, a Controller in Brave New World, would argue that happiness is the most important aspect of life and that the best life has the greatest amount of happiness. This is similar to the philosopher Epicurus’ belief that man should maximize pleasure and minimize pain in order to live a ‘blessed life’; happiness being used interchangeably with pleasure in this text (360).

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

According to Glassman, John Stuart Mill once saw himself and his ideas as subordinate to those of his father’s, James Mill (117). Glassman believes that, by creating his own principle that embodied “individualism and liberty,” Mill made a place for himself in utilitarianism (117). That is because, unlike his father, John Stuart Mill was advocating “unhindered participation” in the harm principle (118). As a result of its stark distinction from the views held by his father, Peter Glassman views Mill’s harm principle as a piece that was meant to free him and create a name for himself in utilitarian

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

It was not until Mill’s late teens that he began to study Jeremy Bentham and his utilitarianism theory. “Reading Bentham satisfied Mill’s cravings for scientific precision and gave him a new way of looking at social intercourse” (Buchholz 97). Mill became so intrigued with Bentham that he decided to preach the Benthamite gospel in the Westminster Review, a publication started by his father and Jeremy Bentham. Mill’s views soon changed as he grew older. It is said that Mill had a mid-life crisis at the age of twenty because he took the Bentamite precision too far and actually forgot the ultimate goal of Utilitarianism in the first place, happiness.

Read More
1413 Words | 6 Pages

In a critique of both the works, the paper adopts the Aristotelian thought citing that actions of human aims to fulfill goodness, which arguably is the happiness, one that arises from virtues practiced out of habit. Both the philosophers weigh in heavily on the role of happiness in the day to day lifestyles of humans. Adopting a sharp critic to the conventional principles of utility, Mill recognizes that happiness, as opposed to pleasure has a wider space in human attainments. He goes in deeper to explore the levels of pleasure

Read More
1564 Words | 7 Pages

John Stuart Mill, at the very beginning of chapter 2 entitled “what is utilitarianism”. starts off by explaining to the readers what utility is, Utility is defined as pleasure itself, and the absence of pain. This leads us to another name for utility which is the greatest happiness principle. Mill claims that “actions are right in proportions as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” “By Happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain, by happiness, pain and the privation of pleasure”.

Read More
1866 Words | 8 Pages

John Stuart Mill was a transitional thinker with a classical utilitarian philosophy. He was a programmatic thinker with a lifelong project to reconstruct the classical utilitarianism. In this collection of On Liberty and Other Essays, Mill is representing his central moral and political concerns for his time. On Liberty is the first essay in the book, followed by other essays such as Utilitarianism, The Subjection of Women, and then lastly Considerations on Representative Government. John Stuart Mill in his On Liberty essay breaks it up into five chapters supporting his argument that liberty is what is best for mankind and that society should only have power to control actions that directly affect it or harms its members.

Read More
1005 Words | 5 Pages

What Mill means by utilitarianism is giving the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people. According to Sandel's lecture Mill's utilitarianism uses consequentialist reasoning. Categorical means absolute for example, if someone asks you if you are hungry a you say,"no",

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

John Stuart Mill writes, “It is better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.” in his book Utilitarianism. The meaning of this quote varies based on what makes an individual satisfied or dissatisfied. The “good life” is the life a person would like to live as well as what makes them better off. Would having a “good life” mean that a person is content, or does virtuosity make one happy?

Read More

More about John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document