ipl-logo

John Stuart Mill Research Paper

471 Words2 Pages

The debate on whether tobacco companies should be required to sell their products in plain packaging is one that has been discussed worldwide since Australia introduced the legislation in December 2010. Mill’s “On Liberty” discusses the “nature and limits of the power that can legitimately be exercised by society over the individual.” The plain packaging has largely been applauded as a means of reducing the demand for cigarettes but when are we justified in interfering with the liberty of a competent, mature member of our own society?
Firstly, through the harm principle which, according to Mill governments are entitled to restrict an adults liberty only when it is necessary to do so in order to prevent harm to someone else. However, it cannot be used to prevent …show more content…

Mill reasons that state power is liable to abuse and therefore, may limit the liberty of citizens to pursue and promote their own interests. However, Mill does not view warning a person of the possible adverse consequences of their actions as paternalistic. “These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with any evil in case he do otherwise.” Through Mill’s writings on paternalism it is obvious that the warnings that New Zealand currently places on tobacco does not undermine a person’s liberty but, in removing all branding, the state interferes with the liberty its people by removing an individual’s autonomy. Plato, among other philosophers, argue that autonomy is essential for individual happiness “The heaviest penalty for declining to rule is to be ruled by someone inferior to yourself.” (Plato ‘The Republic’) In this way it is shown that by adopting paternalist principles to use plain packaging on tobacco may in fact do more harm than good as the removal of one’s autonomy is a removal of an aspect of their

Show More
Related
255 Words | 2 Pages

In his article, “Addicted to Health” Robert H. Bork has written about an ideal that is told through an informative argument on how government efforts are betraying what the founding fathers have built this great nation upon. The idea of freedom. Bork claims that many recent altercations with tobacco companies betray an ultimate ambition to control American lives. He implies many facts that include percentages about the smokers of American society and explains how the government relies on tobacco companies, to help cover up the funds that have been lost throughout the years. He also relates the issue to alcoholic beverages and the era of prohibition.

Read More
456 Words | 2 Pages

Firstly, the Synar Amendment is a representative example of the federal anti-tobacco regulations, on which I focus in the proposal essay. Such amendment is an efficient method of the authorities in the attempt to restrict the use of tobacco, with the juvenile being the aspects in particular. Secondly, the term is a typical concept in America, which is unfamiliar to many countries in the world. Because of this, there are plenty of rooms for discussing the difference between the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws of the United States and those of other countries in my research paper. To sum up, I firmly believe the concept of “The Synar Amendment” will develop my argument

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

That is why many people like using e-cigarettes. Freedom You will have more freedom if you switch to e-cigarettes.

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

Whether it is at the dinner table or in my family’s group text message, the conversation about my brother’s custody battle with my mother’s side of the family seems to remain a bitter topic, especially when discussing my role in it. When my father physically harmed my brother to the extent to which he had to go to the emergency room, the custody trial over my brother and me began. After several sources provided the judge with accusations against my father, I was the final source that needed to assert or deny my father’s abuse; with heavy consideration, I decided to lie to the judge by denying my father’s abuse. Under the principle of utilitarianism, philosophers would infer that lying is permissible if the consequences of doing so are good.

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

A decision was also made to stop advertising cigarettes and tobacco by removing them from display and removing any branding from the packaging. This will help to reduce the number of people taking up smoking particularly children (Russell, 2017). Those opposed to the smoking ban have criticised the legislation for being a patronising approach developed to encourage state-enforced behaviour-modification rather than to protect the non-smokers in society and improve health levels (Hitchens, Hoggart, 2007). 4.2 Deprivation Deprivation is a state of being prevented from possessing, enjoying or owning something (Merriam-Webster, 2017).

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

In Mill’s ideal government, there each individual is allowed to do anything they wish as long it does not directly harm another citizen or violate their rights (On Liberty, 55). In order for the members of society to have a maximum potential of freedom, the only restrictions set by the government are those that keep individuals from mistreating or harming one another. John Stuart Mill advocates for the freedom of thought because allowing diversity of opinion can help discover new truths that may benefit society. The suppression of ideas puts society at great risk for silencing potential truths (On Liberty, 19). He argues that there have been truths that were persecuted as false views in the past that are now considered true views because “truth always triumphs over persecution(On Liberty 29).”

Read More
1914 Words | 8 Pages

My topic originated from reading Thomas Carlyle and John Stuart Mill 's debate in December 1849-January 1850. Both writers published anonymously in Fraser ' Magazine, with Carlyle writing a violent critique, ‘Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question’, and Mill sending in an outraged response simply entitled ‘The Negro Question’ that appeared in the following issue. Counteracting Carlyle 's very racist vision of the repartition of work among Black and White Jamaicans with arguments undermining that conception , Mill retorted But I again renounce all advantage from facts: were the whites born ever so superior in intelligence to the blacks, and competent by nature to instruct and advise them, it would not be the less monstrous to assert that

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

The United States of America blesses us with the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition, and many others. We have the liberty to choose our own actions, but should that liberty allow us to choose actions that could potentially take away other people’s freedoms? In his book On Liberty, Philosopher John Stuart Mill says a person can do whatever they want as long as is does not harm others. If a person’s actions only affects the individual, society and the government have no right to intervene. Only when someone’s actions become harmful to others should it should be stopped.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

At this juncture, the issue at hand becomes an expense as it starts to involve lawyers, hearings and the likes. Also, I would like to believe that since it is stated that faculty’s campus organizations are prohibited from accepting any money or gifts from tobacco companies, the faculty as a whole does not earn any financial boosters from tobacco companies. Thus, the damage caused is catered for by the faculty. Likewise, such an experience is what Machiavelli describes as rewarding a few but offending many. Mostly, by this statement, he shows that there are some activities which are satisfactory for a small portion of the population (in this case allowing the “smoking zone”) but hurt the larger part.

Read More
1128 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction: John Stuart Mill essay on Consideration On representative Government, is an argument for representative government. The ideal form of government in Mill's opinion. One of the more notable ideas Mill is that the business of government representatives is not to make legislation. Instead Mill suggests that representative bodies such as parliaments and senates are best suited to be places of public debate on the various opinions held by the population and to act as watchdogs of the professionals who create and administer laws and policy.

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

Motivation. It is a powerful force that pushes humans in their everyday lives to always try our hardest and allows us to focus on the abundance of goals we desire to achieve throughout life. It also enables us to be the sentient and moral human beings that we see ourselves as today. With that said, is motivation always relevant to morality? Are we nothing but immature and incapable living things without motivation?

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

Is the world as free as we'd risk thinking? Not as indicated by the 2016 Freedom of the Press report, which found that close to 13 per cent of the total populace, appreciates the advantages of a free press in 2016. Also, no place is this absence of the right to speak freely more obvious than in North Korea, where three BBC writers were kept and later removed for "talking sick of the framework and the authority of the nation" amid scope of the nation's gathering congress this week.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

I chose to review the fifth chapter of “New Ideas From Dead Economists” titled The Stormy Mind of John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill was born in 1806 in London to two strict parents who began to educate their son at a very young age. Mill’s father was James Mill, a famous historian and economist, who began to teach his son Greek at the age of three. The book reports that “by eight, the boy had read Plato, Xenophon, and Diogenes” and by twelve “Mill exhausted well-stocked libraries, reading Aristotle and Aristophanes and mastering calculus and geometry” (Buchholz 93). The vast amount of knowledge that Mill gained at a young age no doubt assisted him in becoming such a well-recognized philosopher and economist.

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

Government intervention in private affairs refers to regulatory actions taken by a government in order to affect or interfere with decisions made by individuals. First of all, I agree with the statement that government intervention in private affairs is always undesirable. Firstly, many consider it as an intrusion into personal choice as the government tries to intervene into private affairs. Besides that, people consider it to be a human rights violation. However, there are still positive sides to government intervention and this essay aims to examine whether government intervention in private affairs is always undesirable.

Read More
1119 Words | 5 Pages

Being Free 1st draft Freedom is word used in a lot of contexts, but the official meaning of the word is “the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants” (Freedom). Meaning that you have the right to do something, with the focus being on you as an individual. This means no one can tell you what to do, like for example a state. This is an important aspect and part of political theory. Liberty is also used and viewed as the same category of theory, and has the definition “The state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s behavior or political views” (Liberty).

Read More

More about John Stuart Mill Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document