“Never, ever become someone’s victim is the golden rule,” Julian Assange once said (“Keane”).
On October 4th, 2006, this man was to become one of the most prominent men in a year’s time.
Although several call him a criminal and a traitor, others call him an idol, and without regards to
what anybody thinks of him, Mr. Assange stands by his decisions and plans to continue to do so
in the future (“Murphy”). It is for many of these reasons that he is shunned, but it is up to the
reader to decide whether or not he/she believes what is happening to Assange is necessary or not.
In the year of 2006, multiple United States’ “secret documents” were leaked on a website
recognized as WikiLeaks. Indicated website has been criticized
…show more content…
Countries all over the cosmos have opposed Julian any safeguard. Therefore, a destiny being
guarded by British combatants interminably, looks like the utmost feasible thing for Mr.
Assange. (“Youssef”)
This man’s predicament can be fixed to that of a fabricated novel known as The Scarlet
Letter, by Nathaniel Hawthorne. The woman in the tale, Hester Prynne, was destined to abide by
a life of shunning in a singular venue; just as Julian is. In the novel, the community perceived
that they could manufacture a precedent out of Hester. This is the equivalent with Assange;
America is attempting to compose a lesson out of him for all whistleblowers. Hawthorne’s
fictional novel ultimately portrays the fact that Hester one day just deserted her town; whether or
not Assange will one day just disappear, is left for us to find out in the prospective future.
Julian Assange is the martyr of his willingness to aid the American people and the world as
a whole. Many perceive him as a hero, while others view him as an apostate. Assange believes
that he has assisted many and plans on maintaining to do so. He regards himself as the