ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Ethos And Emotions

753 Words4 Pages

Logic or Emotion? What would appeal to someone more for them to understand someone's side, logic or emotion? This question is relatable to a subject to a Shakespearean play with the speeches between Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus. There are many arguments of who had the better speech but it's not who had a better speech but who used the different techniques better. The different techniques they used were ethos- based on ethics and character, logos-which deals with logical reasoning, and pathos-relies on emotion or passion.With the different techniques which also set them apart that means who used their resources better to convey their message such as Antony used an emotional perspective because he knew how unintelligently the crowd was. …show more content…

With the ethos technique he also used many fallacies a fallacy he used was a red herring, which throws the conversation off track a little bit. What threw it off was when he showed the stab wounds and named who had what cut but he wasn't there to see it and the people believed him. One other one he uses its repetition this was used with the word ambition which was about Caesar Brutus stated he wasn't ambitious(III,ii,73-107 ). With all the fallacies that Antony used gave him the upper hand because he didn't misjudge the crowd like Brutus. The last fallacy Antony used was non-disproof which points back to the cloak stating who made what stab without having proof of who had what stab …show more content…

He misjudged the crowd greatly and only got blank stares during his speech. The fallacies that Brutus used was false because he stated killing Caesar needed to happen for the sake of the roman people. He also used the either/or fallacy only giving two options he claimed “ would you rather him be alive and live slave, or him die so you are free”(II,ii ,12-33 ). With all the confusion that Brutus caused with his logical speech one of his major flaws was misjudging the crowd badly if he would've taken another route maybe he could've had people to support him. What made their speeches alike was that they were both trying to win over a crowd. Another concept was the fallacies they used they used those to their advantage. The last thing is the ethos logos and pathos technique which only really worked for Antony with the route that he took. With all the similarities in their speeches there are quite a few things to set them apart. Such as the route they took to convey their message with Antony using the emotional side and Brutus using the logical side. The next difference is the judging of the audience out of the two Antony was the one to read the crowd right therefore that already gave him an advantage. In the end the one major thing that set them apart is who got the support of the people. With Antony having a good read of the people the people

Show More
Related

Ethos And Logos In Julius Caesar

807 Words | 4 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare Rome is struck with utter disorder after certain characters use ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate the people of Rome. One character who uses ethos, pathos and logos is Cassius to manipulate Brutus into joining the conspirators. Brutus also uses ethos, pathos and logo to justify his killing of Caesar. Last, Mark Antony uses ethos, pathos and logo to manipulate the Plebeians against Brutus and the conspirators. Thus, Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony all use ethos, pathos and logos to manipulate one another and bring the people of Rome to their sides, resulting in total chaos.

Read More

Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More

How Does Julius Caesar Use Ethos In Antony's Speech

593 Words | 3 Pages

(Elements 835). In this quote Antony states that he does not want to be shrewd, but Antony wants to tell the People of Rome what really happened to Caesar and what should happen to change the power in Rome in favor of the people. Antony appeals to the citizens feelings. He does this because he has strong feelings about the tragic death of his dear friend Julius Caesar. He wants revenge on the conspirators and then he wants to achieve the position in power in Rome (What is the basic difference).

Read More

Analyzing The Words 'Mourn For Caesar'

441 Words | 2 Pages

Ethos, Pathos, and logos are the rhetorical triangle of a speaker's ability to appeal to their audience. Both men used the credibility of their names, logic, and showed emotion during their speeches to the citizens of Rome. The one fatal flaw that makes their speech so different is their use of actions to the audience. Brutus’ speech is not just about Caesar, it is also his way of convincing the crowd that his murder was not out of malice or blood lust. His starting words weren't about Caesar, they were about how the crowd should judge his actions fairly based on how they knew

Read More

Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar

818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More

How Is Marc Antony Similar To Brutus Caesar

410 Words | 2 Pages

Antony vs Brutus Today we will be comparing and contrasting both Brutus’ and Marc Antony's speeches. Both comparing and contrasting the believability/credibility, logical facts, and emotional appeal of each speech. There will be lines directly from the book relating to the speeches of both men. These will help show the facts of the use of logos, ethos, and pathos.

Read More

Powerful Words In Julius Caesar

521 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar Essay Words are more powerful than weapons. Throughout the play of Julius Caesar the idea of powerful words is a key theme. Through speeches lies and cunning plans the characters in this play are able to convince people to join conspiracies and move people to action. This play reflects on the need for excellent speaking skills and its importance in ancient Rome, Elizabethan, and modern times.

Read More

Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More

Brutus Vs Antony Rhetorical Analysis

877 Words | 4 Pages

This is evident from Brutus’ overuse of logic and under use of emotion to persuade the crowd. Whereas, Antony largely appealed to emotion and shocking the crowd to make them love Caesar again and hate Brutus. Most of the ethos used by the speakers

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

Brutus Funeral Speech Essay

848 Words | 4 Pages

Would you trust someone who kills their best friend for the good of their country or some guy who thinks they knew the leader? Exactly, you would want and trust a leader who would do anything for the good of their country. Julius Caesar was murder by Brutus and the other conspirators but they said it was for the good of Rome. Brutus and Antony both gave a speeches over Julius Caesars death to appeal to the plebeians. Brutus funeral speech was a more effective speech than Antony because his use of ethos, pathos, and logos made the plebeians focus on his words more.

Read More

Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus

755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis

754 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus and Antony use ethos, logos, and pathos in their speeches to convince the commoners of their side of the story. One person just so happens to be more convincing than the other. Using ethos,

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Ethos And Emotions

Related Topics

Open Document