ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Pathos

708 Words3 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar by, Julius Shakespeare, both Antony and Brutus give speeches after Caesar died. Brutus tells the people that it was for the good of Rome and had to be done. Brutus also backs up his claim by giving examples of how “ambitious” Caesar was. Antony on the other hand wanted to persuade the Roman people that what Brutus and the conspirators was wrong and they need to seek revenge. Both Antony and Brutus use Ethos, Logos, and Pathos, which are tools used in speaking or writing to persuade people. Ethos is an appeal based on the character of the speaker, Logos is an appeal based on logic or reasoning, and Pathos is an appeal based on emotions. Antony's speech is better than Brutus's because he is more persuasive and is more …show more content…

This shows that Caesar wasn't ambitious and trustworthy. Antony uses his emotions to also win the people's trust. Antony is talking about the emotional story of how Caesar was murdered. He brings the people to a sad state and the Romans start to respect Antony more. Brutus thought that his reasoning behind the assassination of Caesar would be enough to persuade that the killing of Caesar was the right thing to do. Brutus only relied on his honorability and thought that would be enough, but it …show more content…

Brutus uses ethos the most in his speech, he was considered very honorable by the Romans. Since he was very honorable everyone believed that anything that came out of his mouth had to be true. Brutus had an easier time to win over the people of Rome. Antony is constantly questioning Brutus. Antony targets the credibility and character of Brutus when he says; “And Brutus is an honourable man.” (III.ii.1631). Antony repeats that phrase when he wants to prove that they are not as honorable as they seem. Antony gives an example of how the conspirators are doing something dishonorable. He tries to persuade the crowd that their interpretation of the conspirators may be wrong, and that they weren't honorable men at all. Antony finally persuades the crowd without saying what the conspirators did

Show More
Related
425 Words | 2 Pages

During Brutus’s address to the crowd regarding the assassination of Caesar, Antony saw himself rise through a view that was unveiled by his relationship with Caesar. Throughout the speech, both Brutus and Antony used ethos, pathos, and logos. With ethos, Antony proved his truthfulness through his friendship with Caesar. With pathos, he gained the trust of the citizens. Using logos, he shows why it was needed for Caesar to be removed.

Read More
764 Words | 4 Pages

The words that decided Rome Have you ever killed your best friend because you thought they were too ambitious? The tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare takes place before the fall of Rome and tells a story about a group of noble senators that despise a monarchy. During this time a honorable senator named Cassius convinces his friend Brutus to form a conspiracy group to rebel Julius Caesar's absolute monarchy. Soon after they form a conspiracy group and assassinate Caesar they are confronted by the Roman people. Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches to the Roman people and how it influenced the rest of the play and characters.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

In Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, portrays the assassination of Roman ruler Julius Caesar, the aftermath of his death and the eventual death of the assassins, including Brutus and Cassius. In Act 1, Scene 2, funeral speeches are being given by Mark Anthony and Marcus Brutus after Caesar’s death; although Brutus’ use of ethos was more compelling than Anthony’s, ultimately Anthony’s speech was more persuasive than Brutus’ because of his impressive use of pathos and logos. One type of rhetorical strategy used in speeches and discussion is ethos, or an appeal to ethics. Brutus uses ethos for the majority of his arguments. An example of this is at the very end of his speech.

Read More
671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More
850 Words | 4 Pages

The motivation behind Antony’s actions was completely selfish as he wanted to defend and avenge Caesar, gain power by giving himself credibility as Caesar’s right hand man, and unleash utter chaos in Rome by invoking civil war. Antony’s speech was able to completely reverse the effects that Brutus’ speech had simply because people care more about what agitates their emotions, rather than what logically makes more sense to

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

(Lines 34-35) This is used to show that what Brutus has done is not as brutal as killing someone for the fun of it and that he killed Caesar for The rights of Rome. Antony said, “I have come to bury Caesar not praise him." (Line 72) Antony thinks no more of Caesar than Brutus so he is not there to make Brutus look bad.

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Ethos, Pathos, and logos are the rhetorical triangle of a speaker's ability to appeal to their audience. Both men used the credibility of their names, logic, and showed emotion during their speeches to the citizens of Rome. The one fatal flaw that makes their speech so different is their use of actions to the audience. Brutus’ speech is not just about Caesar, it is also his way of convincing the crowd that his murder was not out of malice or blood lust. His starting words weren't about Caesar, they were about how the crowd should judge his actions fairly based on how they knew

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus powerfully uses ethos throughout the performance of his speech; he is able to appeal to his own credibility and character by referencing how he honored Caesar. For example, when he says, “For mine honor, and have respect to mine honor” and “I honor him”. He also claims he feels sympathy for Julius Caesar when he says, “As Caesar loved me, I weep for him”. This shows the crowd that Brutus felt guilt and sadness after the death of Brutus that he caused.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

In the art of persuasion, there are many tactics that people use to convey or persuade people into getting what they want. There are several tactics used to achieve this, but the main ones that we see being used today are classical appeals like pathos (emotional), ethos (authority), and logos (logical). These appeals have shown up in many types of literature for a character to get their point across, but one of the best examples is in William Shakespeare's “Julius Caesar”. These appeals are used in two great speeches that are told by Brutus and Antony. Brutus’s speech uses ethos and pathos to get the crowd to agree to his killing of Caesar, while Antony uses the power of pathos and logos to refute what Brutus said to convince the crowd to follow him in his

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

In Brutus’s speech he used ethos and logos to try and control the people of Rome. He was stoic and blinded of what Antony was capable of. He wanted to change their minds about the conspiracy and the murder of Caesar. Brutus says “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men” (III, i, 23-24).

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More
884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

III.ii.88” by saying this Antony is building up the image of Caesar and showing all the citizens Caesar’s compassion for them, and how he sees himself as no better than when the people in his city are sad, everything affects him too. That is what helps open others eyes to what Antony sees and that is how Antony tries to get them on his

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Pathos

Related Topics

Open Document