ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

697 Words3 Pages

Who’s Speech Had More Support? The “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” by William Shakesphere is a history and tragedy play used to give information on Julius Caesar’s death while adding everyday conflict. In the story Julius Caesar, the main characters start a plot against Caesar that will lead to his death. During the funeral two people gave speeches, such as Mark Antony and Brutus. Mark Antony and Brutus’s speeches were different from each other in two ways. One supported him, and one did not. Who persuaded the audience to their side, Brutus or Antony? Both Antony and Brutus held speeches at Caesar’s funeral, in which they tried to justify why each side was justified. Antony used pathos to persuade the audience, while Brutus used logos. “When …show more content…

“Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more”(Anderson and Inc) This is an insert from Brutus’s speech that he used ethos to try and convince the plebeians that Caesar was greedy and ambitious, trying to take over Rome and not see what was good for the people. Which is why I side with Antony's speech because he uses what the people of Rome care about to try and persuade them to turn against the conspirators. How does each speech use logos, ethos, or pathos and why do they use them? Antony’s speech uses pathos because he tries to convince the plebeians that Caesar was not an ambitious man “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious”(Shakespeare)? This is a quote from the passage in which he tries to convince the plebeians that Caesar was not ambitious. There is also another passage in which Antony states that Caesar’s will leave the People of Rome. 75 dramacha each. But in Brutus’s speech he uses logos and uses logical appeals to try and convince the plebeians that Caesar was a dangerous man who would cause the downfall of

Show More
Related

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

850 Words | 4 Pages

In Antony´s speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral, had a hidden, alternate motive. Antony uses rhetoric all throughout his speech, the rhetoric being used are pathos, ethos, and logos. He uses pathos when he is addressing the crowd about how Caesar has compassion for all the people in Rome. Antony also uses logos and ethos to undermine the conspirators. Antony is the speech giver and his target audience are those who admired, and adored Caesar.

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar's Death

1009 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus and Antony both spoke to the Plebeians at Caesar’s funeral with the intent to persuade the crowd to be in favor of themselves. Since Brutus utilized Ethos and Logos to explain his actions and nothing more, his speech was logical. Correspondingly, he had spoken with the hope that the situation would resolve with the Plebeian’s understanding and his entry into Kingman ship. Meanwhile, Antony made use of Pathos with Logos. Therefore, Antony’s monologue was based emotionally.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

945 Words | 4 Pages

You have forgot the will I told you of.” (3.2.119) By asking the question and answering, he’s establishing a right and wrong side, his side being right. Brutus, however, also does a good job of establishing logos, by showing the people what is the effect of Caesar’s death. “Here comes his body, mourned by Mark Antony, who, though he had no hand in his death, shall receive the benefit of his dying, a place in the commonwealth, as which of you shall not? With this I depart, that, as I slew my best lover for the good of Rome,” (3.2.113) When Brutus states what they’re receiving the benefits of his death, he’s also saying that Julius living would be negative, essentially telling them they should be happy that he’s dead.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

1035 Words | 5 Pages

However, they were not alone- with Mark Antony rising in fury for justice to Caesar. Each opposer gave a speech at the funeral of Caesar for their cause. Brutus in formality, attempted to convey his reasoning in executing the murder, as a representative of the conspirators. Using many rhetorical devices including pathos and logos, the crowd is swooned with his perception. Brutus's victory is short lived, because as soon as Mark Antony steps up, his tactics of persuasion,

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Brutus's Ethos Pathos And Logos

339 Words | 2 Pages

Brutus’s and Antony’s speech both have fairly different meanings. Though you can find some similarities in their very eloquent speeches. Out of all the rhetorical devices one thing they use quite often is rhetorical question. For example in Brutus’s speech he says, “Who is here so base that would be a bondman?”. Antony uses, talking about crowning Caesar, “Which he did thrice refuse: was this ambition?”.

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

916 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both used different techniques in order to capture the audience's attention and approval in their speeches about Caesar's death. They both include repetition, rhetorical strategies, dramatic pauses, and parallelism in order to get the crowd on their sides. Both men use different strategies by knowing the audience and they use this to their advantage. Brutus and Antony both choose the use of Pathos and Ethos specifically appeal to the audience and their love for their country.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis

754 Words | 4 Pages

In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

360 Words | 2 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, two characters, Brutus and Mark Antony both give speeches at Caesar's funeral. There is an obvious outcome as to who won over the commoners, which is Mark Antony. In Brutus’ speech, he gave examples like Caesar being to ambitious as a reason to why he and the conspirators killed him, and the outcome of what might of happened to the commoners if Caesar was not dead and held power. But with Antony he is able to change the crowds opinion by using rhetoric.

Read More

Symbolism In The Masque Of The Red Death

673 Words | 3 Pages

Final Draft-- Masque of the Red Death Essay In the short story, ” The Masque of the Red Death” there's a lot of thing going on at once throughout the story. This story takes place during the Black Plague, with Prince Prospero and his family and friends. They try their hardest to hide and run away from the plague while Prince Prospero tries to stay hidden away in his palace.

Read More

How Is Marc Antony Similar To Brutus Caesar

410 Words | 2 Pages

The speeches can almost exactly correlate with outcome of the story. After Caesar's death Marc Antony and Brutus both came before the city of Rome and gave both similar but very different speeches. In Brutus’ speech logos played a bigger roll than anything else. Brutus tried to use his power with his name to win over the people of Rome. Brutus states in his speech “Believe me for mine honor, and have respect for mine honor, that you may believe” (III, ii, 14-16).

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Julius Caesar

550 Words | 3 Pages

In Brutus’s speech he used ethos and logos to try and control the people of Rome. He was stoic and blinded of what Antony was capable of. He wanted to change their minds about the conspiracy and the murder of Caesar. Brutus says “Had you rather Caesar were living, and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men” (III, i, 23-24).

Read More

Brutus And Mark Antony Ethos

535 Words | 3 Pages

After reviewing the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony and their use of pathos, ethos, and logos, the actions and reactions of the crowd clearly show that Antony is the more persuasive speaker. Antony brings up topics but says he should not talk about it because it would hurt the honorable Brutus but the crowd’s curiosity allows him to talk about certain topics. Antony brings up the will but says he will not read it because it would hurt Brutus, the crowd demands that the will be read which is exactly what he wants. Brutus and the other conspirators knows that the crowd could easily turn against them because of how effective of a speaker Antony is, which is one reason why Brutus left when Antony's speech started.

Read More

Brutus Vs Antony's Speech Essay

404 Words | 2 Pages

In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both speak at Caesar’s funeral. They both make strong points in their different speeches, and leave the audience feeling weak but then empowered. It can be argued that Antony gave the more effective speech. Antony’s speech was more effective through his use of irony and emotion.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document