ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

479 Words2 Pages

Angel Reyes Mr. Conway English 1 11 March 2024 Antony the Persuader In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare there were many different characters that were persuasive, such as Cassius, Brutus, and Antony. While Cassius got Brutus to turn against Ceasar, Brutus got the people of Rome to be on their side of the Ceasar murder and Antony getting the people of Rome to seek vengeance on the conspirators. However, Mark Antony exemplified the role as the most persuasive character in Julius Caesar, while he uses pathos to persuade the people of Rome that what the conspirators did was wrong, using Caesar’s body and pauses and also using logos to counter actual examples. Mark Antony displays pathos as he brings Caesar's body into the pulpit, so …show more content…

Moreover, he hath left you all his walks, His private arbors, and new-planted orchards, On this side of the Tiber. He hath left them to you, And to your heirs forever,” (3.2 254-264). In doing this, Antony got the people emotional because Caesar loved and cherished the people of Rome according to his will and the conspirators killed him. He also showed the people Caesar's corpse, “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through. See what a rent the envious Casca made. Through this the well-belovèd Brutus stabbed. For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar's angel. how dearly Caesar loved him! This was the most unkindest cut of all.” (3.2 186-195) Doing this made them emotional as it had felt like the conspirators had backstabbed him as Caesar was a good man and cared about his people according to his will. Furthermore, Mark Antony uses logic on top of pathos to counter brutus by revealing how Caesar was never ambitious or power hungry. Antony supports this by providing many different examples such as “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2 97-99) Doing this he got the people thinking that Brutus was just lying about Caesar and he was never ambitious or wanted all the

Show More
Related

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

1498 Words | 6 Pages

Shakespeare exposes the cutthroat politics of Rome through the speeches of Brutus and Antony in his play Julius Caesar. This play epitomizes the benefits of using rhetorical devices in a persuasive speech. Antony applies the modes ethos, logos, and pathos to establish credibility, provide evidence, and evoke emotion throughout his eulogy to Caesar. Preceding Antony’s speech was that of the senator, and friend of Caesar, Brutus. Conclusively, Antony’s use of rhetorical devices surpasses Brutus’s; Antony successfully persuades the crowd that Brutus’s speech posed as a clever ruse to justify his cold-blooded murder.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

911 Words | 4 Pages

And I must pause till it come back to me. [He weeps]” (III.ii.105-107). Antony shows his love and admiration for Caesar in attempt to make the people feel the same way, as he is in such deep sorrow and misses his dear friend. He strikes compassion upon citizens of Rome through the use of diction and an angelic tone, and the crowd begins to mourn the death of the beloved Julius

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

644 Words | 3 Pages

Since Antony has the crowd back on his side and not Brutus’, Antony wants the crowd to have pity towards what the conspirators did to Caesar. In line 170, Antony says, “If you have tears, prepare to shed them now.” Antony also talks about how treasurous Caesar’s mantle was to him and how he remembered the first day he put it on, which was the day he overcame the Nervii ( lines 172-174). Antony also appeals to the crowds emotions by him saying “ Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through:/ See what a rent the envious Casca made:/ Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb’d;/” ( lines 175-178). Antony shows the marks in Caesar’s mantle and names the names of the conspirators who stabbed him while showing the marks.

Read More

Discuss The Use Of Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar

1268 Words | 6 Pages

In the book, Julius Caesar, an adaptation of one of William Shakespeare's famous plays, there are many key strategies used by the characters, including rhetorical strategies and persuasive techniques. One of the characters, who is a key contributor to this fact is Antony. A piece of his diction that can be analyzed for this is Antony’s speech to the civilians of Rome after Caesar was brutally murdered by their own people. Just a few key rhetorical strategies and persuasive techniques that we can take away from his speech are the use of personification, parallelism, and his act of using emotional appeal to the crowd, in other words, Pathos. Every one of these three things listed helped Mark Antony achieve his goal against the angry mob of citizens believing him.

Read More

How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar

482 Words | 2 Pages

Brutus and Antony are the most predominant characters in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare. In act three Antony and Brutus give a very important speech to the people of rome in which the plebeians get to see their personality. In their speech they both engage one of the three Classical appeals: logos, an appeal to logic; ethos, an appeal to character; pathos which is an appeal to emotion. Although both speeches are similar in structure Antony’s speech is more effective because he wins over the plebeians, gets them to turn on noble Brutus and builds an army.      Antony doesn’t have it great to begin.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

979 Words | 4 Pages

(3.2.101-4). His dramatics demonstrate to the crowd how they should feel, and they follow suit. Once the crowd feels sentimental about Caesar’s death, Antony commences his process of enraging them. While revealing Caesar’s dead body, Antony utilizes loaded language to demonize the actions of the conspirators, Brutus in particular. He claims, “Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed; /

Read More

Ethos Pathos And Logos In Julius Caesar

417 Words | 2 Pages

In the play Julius Caesar, Antony’s speech was more persuasive than Brutus’s speech. Antony persuaded the people of Rome not by what he said, but by how he said it. Pathos and logos were used as a means of persuasion throughout his speech. He also used lots of literary devices in his speech like irony, bandwagon, strawman, appeal to pity, and symbolism. The most common type of irony used was verbal.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

833 Words | 4 Pages

By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

744 Words | 3 Pages

Antony almost immediately urges the crowd to grieve for their once humble leader, and additionally gives them a moment to reflect on themselves and their opinions. Furthermore, Antony commences describing the most minute details of Caesar's assassination: Look, in this place ran Cassius's dagger through. See what a rent the envious Casca made. Through this, the well beloved Brutus stabbed;

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

422 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare's "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar," two powerful speeches are given by Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus. Both speeches are delivered at Caesar's funeral, and each orator seeks to sway the Roman citizens to their side. Although both Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus deliver powerful speeches, Antony delivers the more effective speech because he appeals to the emotions of the people, provides evidence to support his claims, and undermines the credibility of the conspirators. Mark Antony appeals to the emotions of the people. Antony's use of rhetorical questions and repetition, such as "Brutus is an honorable man," is designed to challenge the credibility of Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

628 Words | 3 Pages

Hunter Hartman Mr. Ioannidis English 10 B 22 May 2024 How Antony Persuaded the Crowd In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, the crowd was convinced by Brutus, that Caesar was very ambitious and the conspirators made the right choice by killing him. Then Antony had his speech in which he used rhetorical devices to persuade the crowd into believing Caesar was a good person. Then he stated how the conspirators were not loyal like they said they were. He was so clever when he spoke, he completely controlled the crowd. He got them to do some crazy things.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

560 Words | 3 Pages

And sure he is an honourable man” (3.2.1251). Refusing the crown 3 separate times is a grand show of honor and humbleness that Caesar did possess. Antony’s speech in “Julius Caesar” effectively uses pathos, ethos, and logos to persuade the audience towards his viewpoint. By appealing to their emotions, using his credibility and establishing his connection with Caesar, and presenting logical arguments, Antony successfully convinces the audience that Caesar was a noble and honorable leader who did not deserve his death. His clever use of persuasion strategies is evidence of the complexity of characters and the impact of speeches that still engage audiences centuries

Read More

Julius Caesar Leader Analysis

1556 Words | 7 Pages

Antony speaks to the citizens and is able- without angering the people further, making them hate him, or dishonoring Brutus openingly- to convince them that the conspirators are in the wrong. He does this in a number of ways, all proving him to be very convincing and intelligent. Antony helps the people of Rome remember the good Caesar has done for Rome, and reminds them of how he denied the crown offered to him three times. He shows them the body of Caesar, emphasizing the holes and blood, saying, "Look, in this place ran Cassius' dagger through: See what a rent the envious Casca made: Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabb'd;" Act III, Scene II of Julius Caesar.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Julius Caesar

550 Words | 3 Pages

He made the crowd feel sympathy for him and Caesar. Antony was so persistent about how he worded his speech that he made the people of Rome think they were making their own decision, when really he was influencing them to go against the conspirators. Antony showed the crowd Caesar's body and the stab wounds. Antony says, “Look you here, Here is himself, marred, as you see, with traitors” (III,ii, 191-192). By saying that, it made the crowd connect emotionally to it and feel anger.

Read More

Brutus And Mark Antony Ethos

535 Words | 3 Pages

After reviewing the speeches of Brutus and Mark Antony and their use of pathos, ethos, and logos, the actions and reactions of the crowd clearly show that Antony is the more persuasive speaker. Antony brings up topics but says he should not talk about it because it would hurt the honorable Brutus but the crowd’s curiosity allows him to talk about certain topics. Antony brings up the will but says he will not read it because it would hurt Brutus, the crowd demands that the will be read which is exactly what he wants. Brutus and the other conspirators knows that the crowd could easily turn against them because of how effective of a speaker Antony is, which is one reason why Brutus left when Antony's speech started.

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

Open Document