ipl-logo

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

703 Words3 Pages

Presenting a speech, so it is effective, is not always an easy task. For instance, in Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony speak to the crowd back-to-back from each other, yet one speech in particular makes an impact on the crowd. After both monologues are given, it is crystal clear who is the most favorable of the two in the Roman’s eyes. One, in particular, used spectacular tactics so the crowd would change their point of view on the situation. However, the opposing man lacked the appropriate strategies, therefore it was not a hard decision for the crowd to choose who to side with. The answer to success and failure in these speeches is ethos, logos, and pathos. Consequently, it is obvious with all of the strategies used, who the real winner is. …show more content…

He takes a very formal standpoint when giving his speech. Antony, on the other hand, opens his by saying, “Friends, Romans, and countrymen” (Anderson 834). By taking this approach, he uses pathos and gives off more emotion by calling them his friends first. The honorable man Brutus, gives a formal speech in an extremely serious manner. He has everything planned out and is rational within his speech. Such as listing the reason Caesar had to die for. “I honor him; but, as he was ambitious, I slew him” (Anderson 831). His opposing force, Antony, has a calm tone that the citizens of Rome relate to. His persuasion techniques include pathos and he also uses a hyperbole. Antony says, “When the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (Anderson 835). Caesar actually crying is used as a misrepresentation to make the people believe he is just like them in a certain aspect. In other words, Antony knew who his audience was and how easy they could be manipulated, but Brutus did

Show More
Related

Thank You For Arguing By Jay Heinrichs And Lies My Teacher Told Me

580 Words | 3 Pages

The book is full of speechwriting teachings for public speakers. In particular, it is based on the knowledge of the past such as Aristotle’s logos, pathos, and ethos concepts, and yet tailored for contemporary public speakers with a broad range of references to day-to-day persuasive instances (Heinrichs 231). Besides being highly informative, Jay Heinrichs’ book (Chapters 1 to 10) is also hilarious and dynamic. As earlier mentioned, the book covers the central rhetorical lessons of both Cicero and Aristotle. However, the author further cites fresh examples, centers on workplace, cultural, marketing and political references.

Read More

Gettysburg Speech And Glory Road Rhetorical Strategies

833 Words | 4 Pages

What makes a speech effective? Using rhetoric, a person can appeal to others emotion and logic to persuade a person into doing a desired action. They can encourage a person into success or they can discourage a person into wanting to prove others wrong. The two speeches that will be discussed in this paper will be from Remember the Titans Gettysburg Speech and Glory Road Final game speech. The Gettysburg speech was made in the middle of movie.

Read More

Ethos And Figurative Language In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

1173 Words | 5 Pages

Brutus used ethos frequently throughout his speech, as the people of Rome believe he is honorable and trustworthy. As a result, Antony must diminish Brutus’s honor in the eyes of the crowd in order to make them turn on Brutus. Throughout the speech, Antony says, “Brutus is an honorable man,” each time after giving evidence that Caesar was a good, caring leader. However, the line became increasingly sarcastic each time he said it. As Antony continued to list Caesar’s good deeds, the crowd began to question whether Brutus truly was honorable or whether he had lied about Caesar to free himself of guilt.

Read More

Examples Of Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

900 Words | 4 Pages

In the play, the two speeches contrast on the choice of rhetorical appeals towards the crowd. Brutus's speech, as the reader can see, appeals to the logic of the crowd while Mark Antony appeals to the emotions or pathos of the crowd. Brutas goes first when delivering the speech, his speech is quick and to the point. While trying not to cause chaos in the crowd, Brutas talks highly of himself to make himself seem honorable to the crowd. Brutas says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (Shakespeare 3.2).

Read More

Comparing Aristotle's Rhetoric, Ethos, And Logos

1377 Words | 6 Pages

Primarily used to persuade potential voters for support in election or legislation being championed by the individual or party. To that end, they employ each of Aristotle’s artistic proofs, Ethos, Pathos, and Logos in very artful ways. Unquestionably, one of the greatest politicians of the United Staes, President Ronald Reagan who earned the moniker “the great communicator,” utilized rhetoric effectively. Undoubtedly, on of his most significancy and memorable speeches took place in June of 1987, speaking to an audience of world leaders in front of the famous Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin, Reagan masterfully demonstrated each of the proofs. Admittedly, “President Ronald Reagan, almost by definition, had quite a bit of extrinsic ethos.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

1398 Words | 6 Pages

Antony wanted to speak on Caesar’s behalf to avenge Caesar for what these conspirators did. Antony’s speech ultimately won the hearts of the people, yet some still argue Brutus was the better speaker. Antony was the better speaker, using ethos, pathos, and logos to persuade the audience to avenge Caesar. Antony wants to persuade the hearts of Rome to rebel against Brutus and the conspirators with the use of Ethos. He does this by showing what is the right and the wrong thing for man to do.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

988 Words | 4 Pages

The Persuasion of Rome Julius Caesar has been assassinated. Two speeches follow his murder: One by his “best friend”, Brutus; The other by his best friend, Antony. Since Caesar had potential to be the king of Rome, potentially a corrupt one, a group of Roman senators banded together to assassinate him. Their fears of Caesar destroying Rome's democracy and envy of his power led to his assassination, even though there was no true evidence that permitted his assassination. Although Brutus and Antony both use pathos, rhetorical questions, and logos, Antony used these tactics in a more persuasive manner.

Read More

Pathos In Julius Caesar

850 Words | 4 Pages

After tragedies, public speakers have taken advantage of their ability to voice their thoughts and opinions through speeches. By observing not only the speaker’s motivations but also their approach, the effectiveness of their speech can differ based on their execution. Strategically wording these speeches in their favor, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare demonstrates the immense power of words through the speeches of Marcus Brutus and Marc Antony. Theodore D. Roosevelt also deems himself a credible example of a speaker who used their platform to affect a crowd in some way.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony

696 Words | 3 Pages

His acknowledgement of Brutus saying “[Caesar] was ambitious” (III.ii.82) followed immediately by his saying that Brutus “is an honorable man” (III.ii.83) repetitively shows the crowd that Antony is ungrateful for the conspirators allegedly saving Rome. This repetition becomes sarcastic, creating an ungrateful feeling throughout the crowd. He also repeats good traits of Caesar, including how “He was [Antony’s] friend, faithful and just to [Antony]” (III.ii.81) which establishes an emotional connection between him and the citizens. He uses aposiopesis to display how the assassination has affected him, once again using emotion to persuade the crowd to see the murder the same way he views it. He reminds the citizens that “when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (III.ii.87) which establishes another emotional connection between the fallen leader and the

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

708 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus uses ethos the most in his speech, he was considered very honorable by the Romans. Since he was very honorable everyone believed that anything that came out of his mouth had to be true. Brutus had an easier time to win over the people of Rome. Antony is constantly questioning Brutus. Antony targets the credibility and character of Brutus when he says; “And Brutus is an honourable man.”

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

637 Words | 3 Pages

Worried that the crowd had been completely convinced by Brutus’s words, Antony had to persuade them to be on his side, so he began his speech by appealing to their emotions or pathos. He begins his speech by calling them “Friends, Romans, Countrymen”. Being classified as his friends, Romans, and countrymen is a compliment to most people, and appeals to their emotions by feeling as if you have a strong bond with one another. By showing them that he has a bond with them, he is showing them he is not there to change their mind, but instead to talk to them as the “friends” that they are. Later, he uses empathy by telling the crowd, “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men;”.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

166 Words | 1 Pages

In Brutus' speech he uses logos to try to reason with the crowd whilst Antony uses pathos to control their emotions. Brutus explains that for the betterment of Rome Caesar had to die or else he would ruin the country and destroy the great empire. He at first has everyone on his side, that is of course until Antony speaks. When Antony speaks he gives examples of how Caesar wasn't going to ruin Rome and in fact how he was the best leader they had ever had. He says that Brutus and Cassius are murderers and that's all they are.

Read More

Discuss The Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

705 Words | 3 Pages

He uses his skill of appealing to the crowds emotion to persuade them that Brutus did not kill Caesar out of the good of Rome. Antony states, “O, judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason.” He gives reasons why Caesar is not ambitious and did not deserve to be killed. One of the reasons Caesar was not ambitious is because “when that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept: Ambition should be made of sterner stuff.”

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

More about Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

Open Document