Juxtaposition In Lord Of The Flies

780 Words4 Pages

Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding is an enthralling narrative in which is articulated immensely around conflict and its many destructive consequences. The manner, in which Golding amalgamates aspects of character and mankind’s innate evil, has extensively augmented my level of understanding in relation to the nature of conflict and its severe consequences. Through the use of juxtaposition, dialogue and also symbolism, Golding has led me to foresee that conflict is the symptom of mankind’s failures and also innate evil. Within Lord of the Flies, juxtaposition is unambiguously a prominent element within, which is coherently used to develop conflict between both Jack and Ralph, thus indicating two distinctive tribes. Through the …show more content…

Through the manner in which both of these opposing figures fail to communicate with each other, I am able to view that conflict is a deleterious notion. Both Jack and Piggy bear different priorities on the island, hence being the single cause of this entire conflict. Piggy represents civility and the world of thought, as his main objective is to focus on the fire. Conversely Jack exemplifies savagery and therefore fortifying his despise for Piggy; this is due to the fact that both priorities gainsay each other. This conflict is constituted principally, through the theme of man versing his environment; ‘You ought not to have let that fire out, you said you’d keep the smoke going’ (Chapter 4). Accordingly, it is clearly evident that Piggy is persistent and diligent when approaching Jack in relation to the scarcity of conflagration. In conjunction, Piggy’s glasses eventually get stolen by Jack in chapter 10, thus demonstrating the strength of mankind’s innate savage nature. Due to this embezzlement, it validates the fact that conflict results in the loss of identity; as Piggy’s glasses are symbolic as a major part of his character. Consequently, Jack and Piggy’s failure to communicate with each other and work judiciously simply reinforces the fact that conflict is the basic symptom of mankind’s