ipl-logo

Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

1709 Words7 Pages

From the argument above, it is demonstrated which moral theory, Immanuel Kant’s Kantianism, or Bentham’s Theory of Utilitarianism, is superior. The premises stem from the idea of using a person as a means when all other aspects are equal. Because the argument begins with all else is equal, and the only thing being considered is using people as mere means, no premise is extremely controversial. The only thing we should examine is how each theory acts in accordance with the means of people. According to Utilitarianism, it is justified to do so as long as the best overall consequences are promoted for the greatest number of people. In the instance of killing/murder, moral theory says that killing innocent people is usually always wrong. According …show more content…

The first is that everyone is entitled to basic freedoms (freedom of speech, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, fair value of political liberties, etc.). Everyone should be given the same opportunities to hold positions in office, influence selections, etc. regardless of a person’s social class. The second is what is known as the difference principle. The difference principle shows that there can be inequality in society as long as it makes the worst person better off. Inequalities serve to help society as a whole. Rawls then created a thought experiment called the original position to help support his two principles of justice. This was called the “veil of ignorance,” it is where there were representatives from society who were all behind a veil of ignorance, meaning that they do not know where they will end up in society. For example, if you didn’t know if you were rich or poor or smart or unintelligent. If you did not know your place in society or your inherent talents, you would most likely choose the principles that are fairest to all of society. Rawls has these views because he is an egalitarian and equality is a term that resonates with him. The notion behind his original position is to create a system where people should get what they deserve by how much they contribute to the common good, not by the place that they are born into since that’s a matter of

Show More
Related

The Other Wes Moore Character Analysis

764 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls states that equality of opportunity represents, “… the background institutions of social and economic justice,” that help those who are most disadvantaged (Rawls 288). Through his own story, Moore displays how education allows those who come from essentially nothing can achieve success. It gives, “… a reason to believe that a story of struggle apathy, and pain… can still have a happy ending,” (Moore 183). Rawls also believes in the, “… equal opportunities of education for all regardless of family income” (Rawls 286). Both see education not only as providing knowledge for all people, but also resources and role models, as the most direct and effective method for creating greater social equality within a

Read More

John Rawls Philosophy

901 Words | 4 Pages

I will talk about John Rawls’ philosophy and two major critiques made to his work by G.A. Cohen John Rawls was born in Baltimore in 1921. He was always concerned about poverty in the United States and wanted to change the society he lived in. He wrote his most famous book A Theory of Justice in 1971. This book is considered the most important book in American philosophy after the World War II. John Rawls philosophy is based on his vision of justice.

Read More

Analysis Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

689 Words | 3 Pages

[3]In a thought experiment proposed by philosopher John Rawls, individuals are asked to imagine designing a just society under a veil of ignorance, a concept urging people to prioritize fairness and equality since they can't predict whether their social structures will advantage or disadvantage them. Similarly, [4]Dr. King stresses a fair and harmonious society in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail," except that he focuses on solving existing problems rather than creating a whole new society. The most fundamental difference between Dr. King and John Rawls is that Dr. King confronts a real problem that exists in a real society. In contrast, John Rawls only proposes a theoretical solution.

Read More

Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

1790 Words | 8 Pages

Rawls states in the article “the main idea is that society is rightly ordered, and therefor just, when its major institutions are arranged so as to achieve the greatest net balance of satisfaction summed over all the individuals belonging to

Read More

Egalitarianism In Obamacare

1048 Words | 5 Pages

The natural distribution is neither just nor unjust; nor is it unjust that persons are born in society at some particular position” (Sandel 165). Rawls points out that our society has chosen to ignore the issue of inequity most of the time, so long that the effects of this indifference do not hurt their positions. Moreover, what Rawls has described in this quote is very much evident in our society. The citizens on top–especially upper class white males–have the power to pretend the inequities in American society don’t exist, therefore making our society unjust. More

Read More

The Life And Legacy Of Robert Gould Shaw

775 Words | 4 Pages

Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just

Read More

Objection To Act Utilitarianism

1217 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to act and rule utilitarianism and proving that utilitarianism is untenable. Both act and rule utilitarianism attempt to argue that what is right or wrong can be proven by what morally increases the well being of people. Act utilitarianism argues that

Read More

Friedman Balance Of Power Analysis

980 Words | 4 Pages

We as a nation have come a long way from the times of the cold war era to the current time period. The cold war system was based on division and everyone focused on one aspect which was staying away from each other. In today’s era, we have the globalization system which is all about the balance of power and how each country and/or individual can use it to their benefit. The main perk to them is the world wide web. Due to the global market place, the balance of power between nations, investors and individuals has been greatly affected in many negative ways.

Read More

John Rawls And Dewey: Most Important Ideas Of The 20th Century

261 Words | 2 Pages

Rawls wanted a fair society to all and includes two principles of justice to back up his theory. He believes that everyone is entitled to freedoms whether it is through liberty, speech or the pursuit of happiness. Rawls thinks it should be open to anyone to be able to influence elections and have the ability

Read More

John Rawls Vs Nozick

1371 Words | 6 Pages

Rawls forms his argument, to state that there are guiding forces behind government, which can bring everyone to fairness. Rawls writes, “these principles are to regulate all further agreements; they specify the kinds of social cooperation that can be entered into and the forms of government that can be established. This way of regarding the principles of justice I shall call justice as fairness” (Rawls 1370). This corresponds to society being in a state of nature, entering into a form of contract theory. Rawls’ argument holds that in nature, people hold that justice is the same as fairness.

Read More

An Argument In Support Of Rawls Maximin Rule

1541 Words | 7 Pages

Therefore, by using the veil of ignorance, and explaining that the people in the original position are “rational and mutually disinterested,” Rawls is able to answer the objection of self-interest. The original position indicates that no “rational and mutually disinterested” person would ever agree to discrimination, or potential loss of liberty, if his or her own particular social position, psychological motive, etc. were

Read More

Summary Of The Massive Scope Of Liberty

1841 Words | 8 Pages

Rawls falls more into the positive liberty system of thought. Under positive liberty physical constraint is not a sufficient definition of constraint. Other considerations such as social constraints must be taken into case, this lead Rawls to create a thought experiment. You must imagine yourself in the original position behind the veil of ignorance. This means you must imagine a world in which no rules have yet been made and no constraints have been imposed yet.

Read More

John Rawls: The Benefits Of Natural Talents

913 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay we will go over why Nozick rejects Rawls’ idea and what Rawls’ response to this rejection would be. Rawls ' argument that natural talents should only be used if they can benefit others stems from his belief that people with such abilities are undeserving of them (seeing that they did not work to achieve them) and, therefore, they will only be useful if they use these talents for the oppressed. Mark R. Reiff explains this in his work, “Exploitation and Economic Justice in the Liberal Capitalist State”, where he says that Rawls believes

Read More

John Rawls Theory Of Civil Disobedience

1348 Words | 6 Pages

Rawls’ first principle of justice outlines that social institutions in a just society must aim for maximum equal liberty (Rawls, p. 82). His second principle, the difference principle, justifies inequality, but only when it maximally benefits those who are worse off (Rawls, pp. 65-66). Rawls ‘acknowledges that these principles are an oversimplification of distributive justice, but believes they should be applied to the basic structures of society (Rawls, p. 77). Rawls acknowledges that there needs to be regulations on when civil disobedience is justifiable.

Read More

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Utilitarianism

1711 Words | 7 Pages

Commonly, ethical systems are categorized into two major systems. The deontological approaches or normative ethical position which judges an action based on the adherence of the action to certain rules and the teleological approaches which judges primarily based on the consequences of an action (Hare, 1964). The Utilitarianism is assigned to the teleological approaches, as it does not evaluate an action by itself but by it’s

Read More

More about Kantianism Vs Utilitarianism Essay

Related Topics

Open Document