The situation in above case is not the new one for us as per study of Universal Ethics and Utilitarianism philosophies as Immanuel Kant's categorical imperative that clearly states that moral law applies to every rational being and it will be totally independent of any personal desire, objective or motive. However, Utilitarianism Philosophy describes that moral actions of beings will be those which directly maximize the utility. On the other side, Universal Ethical Law states that moral law will be applicable to every human being in the world regardless their region, religious or community and this law will be independent to any particular quality or specification. If we go through and test Luke's case when he wants taking suggestion and advice …show more content…
According to Kant's own philosophy it is well explained that no one can use moral laws for own interest, motive or benefit even in every situation and this law will become unconditional for its such properties. Kant says that every person occupies a particular place in the creation and his moralities will be summed up as the imperative or worthy. Later on the services, obligations and duties of human beings are derived from commandment of reasons according to their moralities. Thus, the moral law specifies here that Luke is going for his personal matter or motive, as his brother needs help to sell the home against high rate. While, on the other side Company ABC has many of ethics and rules to commence its business in which Luke is employed. So, it will never go against his ethics and basics of moral law. It also imposes the strict conditions to employees to not share the confidential and secrets of Company ABC with anyone outside the