Kant's Deontological Moral Hypothesis

582 Words3 Pages

Utilitarian is a regularizing moral hypothesis that place the locus of good and bad exclusively on the result, the end legitimize the mean. Solving and taking care of the issue is most important. All matters is just the final products if the final products is great then what you did was ethically right. Considering things are at stake for both stakeholder involved. Utilitarian principles sates that proper course action maximize happiness and treat other how you would wanted to be treated. According to the utilitarian for this situation; the result of this choice is bad for both party involved. The girl not just love and regard her non-biological but she have known them for all her existence in light of the fact that her biological parent …show more content…

This part of the law can be ended up being deceptive as per the utilitarian morals as the result itself was inconvenient to the kid with regards to the non-biological parents being rob of the child the bonded with for 9 …show more content…

Even in cases where situation where activity would achieve more satisfaction definitely deemed prohibited. In this case the decision to evaluated on the on whether she going to award the parent or the foster parent, therefore would but herself in their shoe and make a rules. She would have to rule in the decision of the biological parents. This ruling outcome may be unfair to the foster parent and the child due to fact the child only know foster parent for 9 year in which they share unconditional love for each other. This will cause impact mentally and psychologically on the child development. As indicated by the Kantian examination the choice must be assessed on the premise of whether the choices is reasonable and satisfies the obligation of all the partner independent of the results of the