ipl-logo

Kant's Formula Of The Universal Law And Formula Of Humanity

1455 Words6 Pages

In the first half of my essay I shall present and discuss the advice that Kant would offer to a doctor, using his Formula of the Universal Law and Formula of Humanity. I will be explaining what each formula aims to show and how they relate to the possible choices the doctor has. From there, I will discuss whether the two formulas produce the same moral verdict and examine the potential connections between the formulas that make the similar moral verdicts possible. In these next few paragraphs, I will be explaining what the Formula of the Universal Law and Formula of Humanity are, then describe the type of advice Kant would offer based off these formulas. We are to imagine that a patient named George went to his favored health-provider, Dr. …show more content…

Smith to tell George the truth about the test and to let him make the decision of whether or not he wants to get tested on his own. The Formula of the Universal Law states that we are to “act only in accordance with that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it become a universal law” (AK 4:421), meaning that we should only behave in ways in which we would be okay with other people behaving. The formula aims to show the importance of individuals behaving morally well for the sake that it is their moral duty. As well as to show individuals that a majority of times we would not will for our maxims to become universal law, but that we make exceptions for ourselves because we believe it is something we should do. This relates to Dr. Smith’s case because if she were to tell George that the procedure is routine and painless, she would be acting on the maxim that it is okay to lie because she believes it will result in positive consequences. She would not appreciate it someone else lied to her, even if it was for the sake of helping her, because they deceived her. If the individual truly believed that whatever action was necessary for the sake of Dr. Smith, then Dr.Smith would have also realized the importance of the action and came to the conclusion of doing it herself. In the case of George, she is making an exception to the rule of lying because she believes that George would be unable to come up with that conclusion himself, and takes it upon herself to make the decision for him. If this were to become universal law then everybody would lie because they would believe it to end in favorable consequences, even if it ends up being favorable only for themselves. This would result in a contradiction because not everyone would accept the lies because they know that it may only result in a favorable consequence for the

Show More
Related
361 Words | 2 Pages

It is fathomable that it is an exceedingly difficult position to face and the decision the judge came up was equally challenging, however, there must be an alternative resolution. Whether we look to deontological the inquiry ethics and ethical decisions based on an emerging behavior the manner on this court case shed light on what is deemed “right” or the other hand who is honestly worth protecting. I have to irradiate that Immanuel Kant the German philosopher statement applies in this court case, “that all consequentialist theories missed something crucial to ethics by neglecting the concept of

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

When you tell other people you feeling well when you feeling sick, you lying. You tell them that ’cause they have pain too, and you don’t want to add yours—and you lie. My Response: This quote really speaks to me because everyone can relate to it. Everyone lies, the reverend made that very clear but some people lie so much they hardly realize that they are doing it.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

Sissela Bok explores the moral and ethical complexities of lying and deception in her book, Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private Life. One of the scenarios she considers is the normalization of lying and deception in medical contexts, such as in patient-doctor communication. Bok gives an example scenario of a patient who has just been diagnosed with cancer and has no other treatment options. The physician faces a difficult decision: whether to inform the patient of their diagnosis and the low chance of success with chemotherapy or to lie about the possibility of treatment. The physician chooses to tell the patient their cancer diagnosis but does not inform them of chemotherapy.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

The result is the application of the Hippocratic axiom “premium non nocere” (above all, do no harm), which combines the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence: “I will use treatment to help the sick according to my ability and judgment, but I will never use it to injure or wrong them.” The

Read More
5639 Words | 23 Pages

Critiques of Kantian moral philosophy on the basis of emptiness come from a variety of thinkers and from many different schools of thought. For example, Mill claims the universal law permits commonly immoral behavior and can only become consistent by resorting to Utilitarianism. ‘ ‘All he shows is that the consequences of their universal adoption would be such as no one would choose to incur’’ (Mill.Uti.162). Mill criticizes Kant for failing to identify ‘‘the actual duties of morality’’ (Mill.

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

This paper will firstly demonstrate the ability of people to be good or bad, as opposed to one or the other. To begin with, this paper will discuss two examples of good people, Albert Einstein and Martin Luther King, followed by two examples of bad people, King Leopold II of Belgium and Pol Pot. Secondly, this paper will demonstrate why it is necessary to adopt a flexible moral code using the examples of the Aztecs, who were forced to swap one rigid moral code for another, and Harry Truman, who was forced to choose between two unethical decisions. In conclusion, this paper finds that as one rigid moral code can be replaced with another, as in the case of the Aztecs, ethics cannot be a permanent construct, and that a rigid moral code does not

Read More
1339 Words | 6 Pages

Moral Dilemmas of the Trolley Case Introduction This essay will explain what the Principle of Utility and the Formula of Humanity. This essay will outline three trolley cases (the Switch Case, the Fat Man Case and the Loop Case) and how the Principle of Utility and the Formula of Humanity apply in determining what is the moral thing to do when faced with any of these three scenario. This essay will also explain the action that I would take if faced with these cases.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Then there would be the aftermath of this instance, and the citizens might not appreciate being lied to and may

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

This article talks about physician-assisted deaths from a Kantian theory standpoint, in the article it states that “the decision to ends one’s life is itself not autonomous” (Dinh, 478). Autonomy follows the idea of making own decisions for you, not others without inappropriate influence; Kant believes that this procedure violates autonomy and therefore should not be done. Although the article is slated from Kant’s viewpoint, it is also important to remember the other viewpoint. This topic is morally important in our society because such procedures occur today in our society.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

In this paper I will discuss Hume 's notion of morality and compare his understanding of morality with Mill 's utilitarianism and Kant 's deontology ethics. I will dwell into the moral pillars of the Humean ethics and confer his moral principles in sentiments. furthermore, I will talk about Mill 's utilitarian ethics and contrast his notion of happiness with the role of sentiments in Hume 's understanding. on the other hand, I will contrast these two notions of morality with Kant 's deontological principle. Finally, I will contrast the role of reason in Kant 's ethics with the role of sentiments in Humean ethics.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

All though Kant’s moral thoery does not itself address the morality of abortion, I believe that it can be effectively applied to the contemporary discourse on the moral status of abortion. Some modern thinkers, like Harry Gensler for example, use Kantian moral theory to argue that abortion is to be seen as morally impermissible while others, like Susan Feldman, Judith Jarvis Thompson and Lara Denis for example, agrue pro-choice and hence make abortion seem problematic, yet nevertheless morally permissible. In this essay I shall atempt to do just that – to argue that according to Kantian ethics, abortion is morally permissible and hence, that the woman’s right to self-defence is in fact her duty towards herself and as such outweighs the fetus’

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

This issue that I have chosen is the impact of global warming on polar bears. A polar bear major/main threat is due to global warming is the loss of sea ice habitant. These polar bears are marine mammals, which mean they spend most of their time in the sea than on land. The polar bears make their living on the arctic ice. Global warming also has an impact on the population of polar bears (population size decreasing), the sea ice platforms are moving farther apart; which is making swimming conditions more dangerous for the polar bears, it is impacting on their hunting opportunities (fewer), and increased scarcity of food.

Read More
1104 Words | 5 Pages

The end of life process is a scary one. There are situations where people who have a terminal illness are in hospice for months, in severe pain, and sadly awaiting death. There are some countries, states, and groups of people who believe that letting a person die a slow painful death is immoral. Due to these people’s point of view, euthanasia and physicians assisted suicide have become a topic of interest. However, because both of these are still ultimately suicide, Immanuel Kant would not have believed in it.

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

Read More
1625 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, human beings have appeared to participate in wars and immorality more so than they have in using reason to act morally. Kant examines the

Read More

More about Kant's Formula Of The Universal Law And Formula Of Humanity

Related Topics

Open Document