More handpicked essays just for you.
Katharina in taming of the shrew
Katharina in taming of the shrew
What is kathrinas role in the taming of the shrew
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The most apparent show of behavioral double standard is the treatment of Katherine compared to the treatment of Pertuchio. Both characters are presented as wild and free. They never hold their tongues, have violent tendencies, and are of sufficient wealth: yet, only the female character is painted as a shrew. Katherine’s behavior is the focal point of the play.
Through his incentive, he is very determined to marry Kate even though she comes with money, marriage, and a malicious attitude. In addition, Petruchio does not care if his wife is a shrew or foul, he just asks "...if thou know one rich enough to be Petruchio's wife" (1.2.68). Not to mention, after Hortensio tells him of Kate, Petruchio only says to "...tell [him] her father's name, and tis enough" (1.2.95). Petruchio understands that Kate has a "...scolding tongue" (1.2.101) even though Hortensio warms him. Due to his incentive to cure Kate of her shrew-ish ways and to get Baptista's money.
In Kate's final speech in "The Taming of the Shrew" by William Shakespeare, she seems to be saying that she has been tamed by her husband Petruchio. She urges other women to be obedient to their husbands and to submit to their authority. She argues that it is a woman's duty to be obedient to her husband, and that disobedience is a form of rebellion and treachery. Kate's speech suggests that she has come to accept Petruchio's authority and has learned to be obedient to him. However, some critics argue that Kate's speech is ironic and that she is actually using her words to manipulate Petruchio.
The Taming of the Shrew focuses mainly on the relationship and marriage between Petruchio, the shrew tamer, and Kate, the shrew. Kate does not follow the normal social role of conforming to what men say; instead, she is assertive against men, and such actions against men label her as a shrew. Moreover, Petruchio employs methods such as dehumanization in order to change Kate to a conformist of social binaries. For instance, he does not give her food to eat or sleep because he wants to assert his dominance over her and teach her that everything will go the way he wants it to. In the end, Kate gives a speech deeming she has changed into an obedient woman, and accepts her place in society.
William Shakespeare’s “The Taming of the Shrew” has had many art forms based off of it, for insistence “10 Things I hate about you”, directed by Gil Junger is one of them. While the plot, characters, and some themes are similar there are also many differences between the stories, allowing the audience to interpret the stories differently. The main characters in both “The Taming of the Shrew” and “10 things i hate about you” are very similar, yet so different. Katherine, known as Kat in “10 Things I hate about you”, is short-tempered with a shrewish type behaviour.
In William Shakespeare’s play “The Taming of the Shrew,” Petruchio seeks out control over Katherine and plans to “tame” her supposedly shrewish nature. Throughout the play, Petruchio uses many controversial methods to tame Katherine such as humiliation, deprivation, and manipulation. This treatment of Katherine was not ethical, but ultimately resulted in her taming. Despite ultimately achieving his goal of “taming the shrew,” Petruchio’s treatment of Katherine is unjustified as it relies on manipulation and abuse. Petruchio used public humiliation to manipulate Katherine.
Hook. Set In Padua, Italy, The Taming of the Shrew is a Shakespearean comedy depicting the courtship between Petruchio, a young man searching for a rich wife, and the shrewish Katherine, a violent and angry merchants’ daughter. Petruchio vows to tame Katherine and throughout the book he employs a variety of methods to shape her into his ideal submissive wife. The play concludes with Petruchio winning a contest in which he proves that Kate has been turned into an obedient wife who will submit to his will without argument. In her essay “The Raw and the Cooked in The Taming of the Shrew” Camille Slights argues that Petruchio aids Kate in breaking out of the social norms that confine her and teaches her how to properly function in society.
Conversing with her father, Baptista, and Tranio pretending to be Lucentio, Katherine expresses her frustrations about marrying Petruchio before their wedding: “No shame but mine. I must, forsooth, be forced / To give my hand, opposed against my heart, / Unto a mad-brain rudesby, full of spleen, / Who wooed in haste and means to wed at leisure” (Taming of the Shrew, III, ii, 8-11). Revealing the injustices of society, Katherine implies that men have total control over who/how they marry and that women are expected to comply with their will. Furthermore, Katherine’s description of Petruchio as “a mad-brain rudesby, full of spleen” demonstrates the norm of men being able to be unrefined and sloppy, but if a woman were to have those qualities, they would be heavily rebuked for their lack of “lady-like” qualities like being submissive and modest.
Finding a husband, bearing children, and listening to the husband, that’s how women are expected to behave during Shakespeare’s time. As a model for how modern-day women behaved, Katherine can’t even meet one of the standards. Katherine’s verbal attacks, compromise towards Petruchio, and attitude to the widow and Bianca showed how she’s simply playing a wife’s role to get what she wants in the play, Taming of the Shrew. As furious as she was, Katherine managed to attack others verbally even after her marriage. One of the reasons that Katherine is considered to be a shrew is her constant verbal attacks.
Shrew-like Women and Gender roles in William Shakespeare’s “The Taming of the Shrew” The female lead character of William Shakespeare’s “The Taming of the Shrew” Katherina Minola is foul tempered, often insults the people around her and is prone to resorting to physical violence when she is angered. Her unladylike behavior results in most of the other characters in the play believing her to be inherently shrewish. However, Katharina is a far more complex and sympathetic character than this. Her behavior is a result of her treatment at the hands of the male characters in the play, her position as a social outcast and her frustration at not being able to change her situation.
When William Shakespeare’s play The Taming of the Shrew was published in 1590, it was thought out to be one of his many comedies. Although it was a comedy, it revealed a feminist and social position change. The taming of the shrew portrays a dominant rivalry between petruchio and Kate, in an attempt to show that petruchio has male dominance over Kate. Disguise also plays a crucial role in this play, when Lucentio and Tranio have to change their identity in order to be in the king’s good wills.
From Sexism to Social Reformation Many actions and ideologies of the characters in The Taming of the Shrew create an overarching conflict between comedy and sexism for most readers. Specifically, the relationships between the men and women introduce controversial topics such as obedience and love which must be questioned thoroughly. The conditions of Petruchio and Katherine’s marriage was more “traditional” in the sense that it was primarily patriarchal, and that Kate was expected to be subservient and obedient. While this is sexist, on the surface, this was not the intended meaning behind the works.
The Taming of the Shrew Shrew was defined as being applied to women that stepped outside of prescribed social roles (Shmoop Editorial Team, 2008). Shrews were women who were seen as bossy, mouthy, aggressive, and disruptive (Shmoop Editorial Team, 2008). In The Taming of the Shrew, the shrew was a woman named Katherine who was tamed by her husband Petruchio. Petruchio went to Padua to find a wife with a large dowry (Keene, 2015). When they meet in Act 2 Scene 1, Katherine and Petruchio bantered when he addressed her as Kate, even though she corrected him (Keene, 2015).
(4.2.55). This self-fashioning of Petruchio suggests that he is merely playing a role expected of him and that rather than “taming,” he is teaching Katherina to do the same by separating their roles in public and private; “she shall still be curst in company” (2.1.298) which, of course, is reversed in Act
He doesn’t see her as his equal and he will never see her as his equal. Kate being the outspoken and “shrewd” woman must be tamed like an animal in order to fit her “husbands” definition of a woman. I believe that Petruchio and men that excuse his behavior are the problem, not the women in the play. These individuals believe that shrewd women are the problem and the only solution to this problem would be taming.
