From Cave to Cave. My subtitle for Kazuo Ishiguro’s latest novel - The Buried Giant. The start is in Plato’s cave. The place where people live bound. With as little knowledge as shadows projected on walls. A world of interdiction and limitation. When one of them goes out, will he believe his eyes or his experience? Ishiguros’s cave is a world enveloped in fog. This mist conquered land as well as time. People don’t remember their history, nor their yesterdays. Yet they are content that way. But for Axl, an aged man, his neighbors’ attitude towards knowledge is unsettling. With little comfort left, memories fading day by day, and no son by their side, Axl and, his wife, Beatrice seek answers. When they have enough supplies, leaving no debt behind, they depart the village. They’re fighting for something stronger than themselves, for a son they barely remember. Like the freed man from the cave, they want to know more. They believe it is right to seek, but they have dilemmas about the future. For them and for their home. What resides in the lacking memories? On their path they encounter an older woman who takes vengeance on a boatman. The boatman’s mission is to cross people on an island of …show more content…
Was keeping people in darkness a solution? The ones in power created caves and called them safe places. It was up to the individuals to choose how they lived, what they believed. To jump from fantasy to a very nonfiction work: In The Time Paradox, authors Philip Zimbardo and John Boyd reiterate the next idea. “Your attitudes toward events in the past matter more than the events themselves. Psychologists have demonstrated that no one can be certain about what happened in the past, but our research has shown that what people believe about the past influences how they think, feel, and behave in the present. So what good is the past? First of all, our pasts provide us with continuity and a sense of