ipl-logo

Key Conflicts In The Constitutional Convention

1667 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of articles of confederation

Chapter 1.4 and 2 Study Guide After reading chapter 1.4 and chapter 2, please define the following terms and answer the following questions in your own words. Enlightenment-ideas about nature that led to a movement in which philosophers valued reason and scientific methods Great Awakening- a revival of religious feeling in the American colonies during 1730’s-1750 French and Indian War- a conflict in N orth America, lasting from 1754 to 1763, that was a part of a worldwide struggle between France and the transfer of French Canada to Britain Proclamation of 1763- an order in which Britain prohibited its American colonists from settling west of the Appalachian mountains. Sons of Liberty- was an organization of dissidents that originated in …show more content…

Under the Articles of Confederation was a new set of laws that were set up by the new government. Problems that occurred was that land was to be split and people on Northwest Territory had to get the land split into different states. At first this was a problem, but it led to the Land of Ordinance and the Northwest Ordinance which was a Confederation success. A negative was a need for a stronger government which started Shay’s Rebellion. This was a rebellion for farmers where people died and there were rebels. 8. Explain at least two of the key conflicts in the Constitutional Convention. a. In the constitutional convention one of the conflicts that came to hand was that equal representations were given to all the states, big and small. People thought this was unfair, until the Virginia Plan took place which allowed for the smaller states with bigger populations. Another issue was that finally when each state got a certain amount of representatives based off of their population, the southern states wanted their slaves to count as people, allowing for them to be given more representatives. This was solved with the three-fifths compromise allowing for slaves to count as 3/5’s of a person. 9. Why did Antifederalists oppose the Constitution? How did Federalists convince some of them to ratify the

Show More
Related
307 Words | 2 Pages

Why did the Framers of the United States ultimately decide to give more power to the Federal Government rather than the state governments? There were many problems and weaknesses with the Articles of Confederation. Some of the weaknesses was that congress did not have the power to tax, couldn’t regulate trade between the states or foreign countries. They had no National court system, the articles could not be amended without the commitment of all 13 colonies. Despite all the problems and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation there were some good things about it or “strengths”, like it created the first official government of the United States, and the state had no authority to tax or regulate state-to-state trade.

Read More
613 Words | 3 Pages

The three-fifths compromise was a system to determine state representation in Congress by counting each enslaved person as three-fifths of a person. Proposed in 1787 by James Wilson and Roger Sherman, it clearly showed the strength of the proslavery forces during the time of the United States Constitutional Convention. Since the Virginia Plan was rejected, the three-fifths compromise was enacted as a new framework for the government. The Southern states demanded more representation politically because their population was vastly increased due to slavery. The Northerners viewed one free man as one vote and one slave not counting as part of the population while the Southerners viewed one free man as one vote as well as one slave as one vote.

Read More
1680 Words | 7 Pages

In an attempt to address concerns dealing with representation of the states in Congress, delegates chosen from the states: Massachusetts, New York, Maryland, Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Connecticut, and Georgia met in Philadelphia on July 16, 1787 in a meeting called, The Constitutional Convention. Among these delegates was Roger Sherman of Connecticut. Sherman was seen as awkward and unmeaning, giving off the air of a sub-conscious farmer when seated quietly. Although Sherman’s posture and physical appearance was not up to par of other politicians, and gave insight on his background as a Yeoman farmer, his superior intelligence was often recognized and spoken about on a grand level by those

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

Constitutional Convention The beginnings of the Convention (pre-constitution) began when Governor Edmund Randolph of Virginia presented and defended a plan for a new structure of government (called the "Virginia Plan") that had been chiefly drafted by fellow Virginia delegate, James Madison. The Virginia Plan called for a strong national government with both branches of the legislative branch apportioned by population. The plan gave the national government the power to legislate "in all cases in which the separate States are incompetent" and even gave a proposed national Council of Revision a veto power over state legislatures. Delegates from smaller states, and states less sympathetic to broad federal powers, opposed many of the provisions in the Virginia Plan.

Read More
1185 Words | 5 Pages

Compromises Made at the Constitutional Convention Under the Articles of Confederation the government was weak and had little success. Shay’s Rebellion led to the changing of the laws made on the government under the Articles of Confederation. It also led to a convention which introduced the idea of making a new form of government. In 1787 the Constitutional Convention awoke the ideas of making new compromises that the Founding Fathers had to face. Two of the most important compromises included the voting on president which was called the electoral college system and the decision making of how to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

America’s founders created the constitution in order to create unification and order in the United States. However, there have been controversy surrounding the interpretation of the constitution, this has caused debate over many issues within the country. These issues and the lack of wartime policy within the constitution directly lead to the Civil War, which was one of the worst alterations this nation has faced. The Missouri compromise, the Dred Scott decision, and Bleeding Kansas were controversial issues surrounding the constitution that directly lead to the Civil War.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

Although the ‘New World’ declared independence in 1776, by 1787 the United States of America had yet to agree on a constitution that would satisfy the varying needs of each existing state. One of the major debates was over whether the new legislature would give each state representatives based on that state's population or if each state would have equal representation. The larger states desired more influence with proportional representation, but the smaller ones feared that their views would be encroached on if such a system were put into place. The proposal came from Roger Sherman, a Superior Court Judge of Connecticut, who had previously been a delegate during the independence debates of 1776.

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

The ⅗ Compromise was a solution to a conflict between the United States northern and southern states in 1787. The conflict was whether or not enslaved people would be counted as representing a whole person when it came to representation in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives in Congress. It was decided that each slave would represent ⅗ of the value of a free person. The impact of this compromise was that it temporarily solved a problem that could have kept our country from moving forward as a new nation. The ⅗ Compromise allowed our country to ratify the US Constitution in 1790 but also pointed out the great flaw of slavery in our nation and opened our eyes to the reality of slavery and how the slaves weren’t treated like ⅗ of a person at all.

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

Read More
247 Words | 1 Pages

Assembling in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention were focused on ending the era of economic depression, social uncertainty, and leadership under an unhealthy central government that had followed independence (McKay, Crowston, Wiesner-Hanks, & Perry, 2017). Members permitted to discuss their differences without any consequences or retaliation while in attendance of the Constitutional Convention. These delegates were elected due to them being members of the social and educational elite, they were also young, wealthy, and desired to make the national government strong, while promoting economic and social stability (Schultz, 2013). The two main divisions at the Constitutional Convention were the large

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

At all constitutional conventions many argument's come up, and those who propose an idea believe the idea that they proposed is ideal. What doesn't cross their mind is that not everyone will agree with their ideas, in fact in the famous constitutional convention of the United States there were a lot of disagreements, "Serious conflicts arose at the outset, especially between those representing the small and large States" (Bloom). This shows that even though most of the delegates in the American Constitutional Convention soon became important figures in U.S history after the constitution was drafted, they did not agree on the same thing. In the constitutional convention of NuCountry many topics were brought up to be voted on. Most of the

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

Many Federalists and Anti-Federalists began to debate whether the Constitution was good or bad. When it came to representation, there were also differences of opinion in the various regions about whether slaves should count towards the state’s population. The people in the south wanted this so they would have more representatives and therefore more power in Congress. The Northern states did not like this idea and wanted the number of slaves to only determine taxes, not representation. After a lot of debate, the delegates voted on the Three-Fifths Compromise, which would allow three-fifths of a state’s slave population to be counted for representation.

Read More
2377 Words | 10 Pages

This wasn’t as simple as seemed though. During the Convention, ideas clashed, people argued, and two opposing sides were created: anti-federalists and federalists. Some did not like the idea of creating a stronger national government, they wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation and wanted states to continue to have the power, these people were the anti-federalists. The federalist were all for the new form of government and wanted to ratify the

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

There were many important events how ratification of the Constitution was threatened by disagreements between Federalist and Antifederalist. For the Constitution to be approved 9 out of 13 states had to ratify it. Each side wanted some ideas of their own ideas implemented to the constitution, the federalist wanted the ratification of the Constitution, Antifederalist did not. One group called Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution. Some Antifederalists thought that it would weaken the power of the state government.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

In the Constitutional Convention, delegates of the smaller states feared being deprived of influence in the newly formed government, resulting in a demand for equal representation in Congress. Meanwhile, representatives of the bigger states argued against them, claiming that representation should be based on population, which created conflict on representation among the commissaries. As a result, “The Great Compromise” was formed. Thus, small states received equal representation in Congress (the Senate) and larger states received representation based on population (the

Read More

More about Key Conflicts In The Constitutional Convention

Open Document