Throughout the book Farber emerges peculiar counterparts to the current terrorism crisis. Farber goes on to demonstrate how politicians unsuccessfully did not understand the anger of the Islamic fundamentalists towards the United States. Americans as a whole had no concern to the threats of the terrorist group. Farber’s “Taken Hostage”, is an enlightenment of history for America's first engagement with terrorism and Islamic fundamentalist. Farber states, “While November 4th, 1979, marked the beginning of the crisis for America, Iranians (at least those who cheered on the takeover) saw it differently; they would choose other days to mark the beginning of all that
The Golden Rule? In response to recent belief-based terrorism, the conservative Southern States finally removed Confederate flags, that symbolize white supremacy, slavery and seceding from the United States. A white man acted on his Confederate beliefs and shot and killed 9 African Americans in a Bible study. Other supporters of the Confederate flag burned a half-dozen African American churches.
The Port Huron Statement and the Sharon Statement have different point of views when it comes to the outlooks of the young conservatives and young radicals. The Sharon Statement opinion is simple, clean, cut and straight to the point. The Port Huron Statement shows that the research they did follow under the unnecessary events that have happen in the United States that shouldn’t have happen. In the Sharon Statement, the author discusses the purpose of the government that they are to protect those freedoms. The author also talks about the market economy that they use the supply and demand economic system.
In the opening chapter, Kimball begins his discussion by describing his encounter with the then Ayatollah, Ruhollah Khomeini, in Qom, Iran on Christmas Day. He described the Ayatollah as being very charismatic and grandfatherly, as well as being an extraordinarily influential religious and political leader (Kimball, p. 1). The two discussed a number of important issues like the Iranian revolution, Christian-Muslim relations, Jesus, and the U.S. hostages (Kimball, p.
Introduction Lisa Wedeen’s book “Ambiguities of Domination: Politics, Rhetoric and Symbols in Contemporary Syria” provides an explanation to how purportedly weak autocratic states maintain state power and regime stability within civic spaces. Wedeen attends to this question through a “political ethnography” of the Cult of Assad. She asserts that the political rhetoric surrounding al-Assad as a perfect and godly leader is unconvincing to Syrian citizens. The question then arises: why does the regime devote resources to maintaining this omnipresent propaganda if no one believes it, and perhaps more importantly, why are Syrians complicit in maintaining the cult by parroting the regimes rhetoric? Wedeen argues that this Syrian “civic discourse”
26 Despite this, when we analyse the limitations of Radicalism, it is important to remember that they did achieve the separation of
In this chapter, they start off by explaining the two issues that inform the Muslim state of mind. In Islam, there is an idea that knowledge of God returns an individual to his or her natural state, which is also known as fitrah. This is to give the person the purpose in their life. The second issue is that a person should act with moral to all life. God is watching their actions and behaviors.
Without God as a guiding presence in her life, Marji began to rebel against the ever-encroaching fundamentalist institution as much as possible. Under the pretense of religion, Iran strictly enforced new laws against social gatherings and all items of decadence, “They found records and video-cassettes at their place. A deck of cards, a chess set, in other words, everything that’s banned… It earned him seventy-five lashes”(105). This sudden loss of mediums to enjoy one’s self and prevalence of excessive punishment enforcing the declared moral code (132) were invitations to rebel for Marji.
There is a lot of evidence to support this view such as in Livingston’s “Anatomy of the Sacred”, where he states that “many Jews and Muslims… reject [the term Fundamentalism] as not accurately describing their their conservative or even extreme reactionary movements” which could be due to them believing that their view on religion is better than, or more accurate than, any other view so it shouldn't be named differently especially since it wasn't always a pleasant name (Livingston, 2006). However, in Islam “modernization has become synonymous with westernization” which means that their view of Fundamentalism has been changed to be very similar to the western version of Fundamentalism. This showed that Fundamentalism is the final attempt to preserve the old opinions and views of religion by spreading their beliefs to other
Al Afghani was the leader of a movement that awakened Islam from its ignorance. A serious intellectual, his journey started in his studies in Iraq from Shiite scholars. The school highly focused on leadership and religion and he became informed and highly influenced by other Muslim philosophers. By the age of eighteen, Al-Afghani was well educated in philosophy, science, and Islamic studies and traveled all around the world. His opposition of imperialism began when he visited British India, due to witnessing the mutiny that occurred towards Indians.
Shi’ism is recognized as the second largest sect of Islam next to Sunnism. Shi’ism is accountable for more than 10% of the entire Muslim population and has nearly 120 to 130 million members worldwide. It is majorly practiced in places like Iran and Iraq, and also holds a majority in Azerbaijan. History
Through the history, every society has been having problems which choosing an ideology to rule the society. Each ideology has a different idea for ruling the society in a way to improve people lifestyle, political life and improving economy for the whole society. Many philosophers such as, Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, and Paul of Tarsus came with the new ideology and said the ideology is a great one to rule the society and make better life for people, and each of ideologies were tested and used even some of them caused of revolution and change the old ideologies to the new one. When the society has one of these ideologies for ruling like Fascism, Communism, Liberalism, Capitalism, or Secularism, they are not the one that fits with the society
Repression, Radicalization, and Collective Violence When facing domestic dissent, regimes can either respond with “facilitation,” “repression,” or a “combination of the two” (Tilly 2006: 74, 75). Facilitative responses encourage citizens to voice dissent through means that don’t pose a threat to the regime (e.g. peaceful demonstrations) and present a “reward” to those who do so (Tilly 2006: 75). By contrast, repressive responses consist of threatening or arresting citizens who are expected to rebel as well as punishing those who choose to participate in public expressions of dissent (Tilly 2006).“Effective rulers” utilize both facilitation and repression to maintain power (Tilly 2006: 75); Colonel Muammar Qaddafi did not. His decision to exclusively rely on repressive tactics would ultimately prove to be his downfall, as this resulted in the radicalization of the uprising and the subsequent transition from peaceful demonstrations to civil war.
As the meme reinforces the notion of Orientalism, it constructs a negative narrative about Muslims where the issue of alleged slavery in Libya is generalized while portraying non-Muslim religions and its followers as superior. Edward Said, who coined the term, defined Orientalism as a discourse that constructs a contrived binary between the West (Occident) and the East (Orient) in which the ontological stands in contrast to the epistemological conception of the Orient (Abu Hatoum, 2017). As such the discourse of the West holds power over the knowledge about the East and designates the ‘Orient’ as the ‘deviant other’. Within this context, this meme homogenizes Muslims as a ‘barbaric’ group that “still owns black slaves” thus juxtaposes the ‘good’ West with the ‘bad’ East. Furthermore, as Abdolmohammad Kazempur (2014) points out these notions about Muslims create a “false universality” while ignoring the cultural and geographical differences within Muslim society which is represented in the meme as it plasters the issue of slavery in one Muslim country on all Muslim countries.
1. Explain how ‘Establishment Buddhism’ does not seem to run in conflict with modern capitalist development in Thailand. What modern developments do however cause concern amongst traditional Buddhists? Modern capitalist development and establishment Buddhism in Thailand can be seen through its modern productive capabilities which are vastly connected to its ancient history. As well as establishment Buddhism that is reinforced by Thailand’s ancient kingdoms that are rooted in Siamese history.