ipl-logo

Lack Of Responsibility In Frankenstein

999 Words4 Pages

In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Frankenstein and society bear responsibility for the “destruction caused” by the creature. Frankenstein, a scientist, assembled various body parts to “infuse life into an inanimate body” (Shelley 45). After being brought to life, the hideous creation, also known as the monster, was unwanted and became isolated. The emotions that resulted led to the commission of crimes and destruction. Society experienced problems as a result of the monster’s rage. Frankenstein failed to consider the potential danger that his creation might pose. I will illustrate the irresponsibility and neglect that took place. Frankenstein’s lack of responsibility is evident in his creation of a horrifying creature, that he subsequently …show more content…

Given his hideous appearance, society rejected him causing him to become resentful. Despite this, he attempted to do good deeds, such as saving a girl from drowning in the river. Although the monster tried to help people, he was not well-liked by people. Often, the monster observed the De Lacey family and grew to admire their qualities such as compassion. The monster expressed his desire by stating “my heart yearned to be known and loved by these amiable creatures” (Shelley 125). This involved utilizing pathos or constructing an emotional appeal to the reader. Felix, an occupant of the home, violently struck the monster and evicted him due to his appearance. In order to seek revenge, the monster committed a crime of arson, igniting straw and wood until “the cottage was quickly enveloped by the flames” (Shelley 131). This incident serves as evidence that the monster’s violent behavior is a result of rejection rather than pure evil. He holds a deep admiration for the genuine values of a family and experienced anger at the fact that he does not have one. Moreover, the monster desires a society that is free of prejudice against him, he is faced with rejection when he attempts to engage with others. One statement by the monster genuinely reveals this theory behind his actions as he stated, “shall I respect man, when he contemns me” (Shelley 136). This demonstrates that the monster held a disdain for humans due to frequently being discriminated against due to his physical

Open Document