Leaders Assess The Effectiveness Of Law Enforcement Programs

ASSESS LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS
Law enforcement program leaders assess the effectiveness of any criminal justice programs on the basis of the four criteria given below:
Law Enforcement Programs need to have an acceptable description of the objectives and goals of the programs: Goals are the end results of the programs pursued. The end results need to be clearly stated and realistic. The objectives of any program must be both achievable and measurable.
There must be a strong link between the objectives of the program and the program activities. The program mentioned needs to have the appropriate activities in place so as to be able to achieve the results anticipated by the managers of the program. The Handbook series describes the “programs

If the program has been successful in meeting up with the actual performance then such a program is acceptable to the program managers and to the officials overseeing the program.
WHO SHOULD DECIDE WHAT PROGRAMS ARE ELIMINATED
The American Justice System has three essential components: law enforcement, courts and corrections. The enforcement or cancellation of programs must be under the purview of the law enforcement of the criminal justice system. The individuals in the law enforcement division hold the responsibility of taking care of the law, investigating any crimes that take place and lastly in apprehending all those individuals who have committed the crime.
The important components of the law enforcement are individuals like the patrol officers, deputies and the sheriffs, various federal agents, park rangers, games and park rangers and all those individuals whose job is to make the very first contact with the criminals of the area.
Their task deals with upholding of the law, making investigations of the crimes that take place and bringing in the culprits to book. Law enforcement individuals need to be in complete knowledge of the rights of the offenders and the civil rights as well as the citizens’ rights.

The reason behind this is that it is the chief of the police who has to foresee the implementation of the criminal justice programs is bound and answerable to both the authority above him and to the community of the area. He has to assess and examine which programs have been the most useful one and which have not worked for the general public. He is also answerable to the local community for the problems that they face and has to give answers to their issues. (Basic budgeting principles, 2017).
Hence the police chiefs along with the community representatives must decide which programs must be eliminated and which do not require to be